LEE THOMPSON is listed as an executive officer on 18 SEC Form D filings by 12 issuers between Nov 2013 and May 2014. Largest by amount reported sold: ALPHAKEYS RENAISSANCE INSTITUTIONAL EQUITIES FUND II, L.L.C. (New York, NY — pooled investment fund — 2014; $1.03B reported sold to 1,820 investors), ALPHAKEYS MILLENNIUM FUND, L.L.C. (New York, NY — pooled investment fund — 2014; $957.6M reported sold to 2,502 investors), ALPHAKEYS MILLENNIUM FUND II, L.L.C. (New York, NY — pooled investment fund — 2014; $691.9M reported sold to 1,487 investors), ALPHAKEYS RENAISSANCE INSTITUTIONAL EQUITIES FUND I, L.L.C. (New York, NY — pooled investment fund — 2013–2014; $417.9M reported sold to 739 investors), ALPHAKEYS PAULSON ADVANTAGE II, L.L.C. (New York, NY — pooled investment fund — 2014; $355.2M reported sold to 689 investors) and 7 more (all listed below).
What this means That is a lot of deals — 12 separate companies raised money with this person listed as executive officer. Across those companies the filings report $4.47B sold in total.
Listed alongside CLIFFORD B. WATTLEY (18 shared filings), GARY MUNIZ (18 shared filings), JERRY PASCUCCI (18 shared filings), LINA RUBIN (18 shared filings), LOUIS KLEIST (18 shared filings) and 6 others.
What this means These are the other officers, directors or promoters the companies named on the same forms — the team around LEE. Each name links to their own page.
All 12 issuers belong to the sponsor group Alphakeys (35 issuers, $9.16B reported sold, 2009–2024).
What this means A sponsor group is one team that sets up a new company for each deal. Alphakeys has 35 companies on file and $9.16B reported sold in total — the group page shows the whole track record in one place.
Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA) — 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below. Not yet searched: SEC enforcement releases.
What this means 1 record came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.