PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:37 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

EU

Eif Uspf

One sponsor team, 6 deal companies · Needham, MA

Grouped because: 7 shared people, 3 shared management entities, same business address (5 issuers), similar issuer names (4) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

6deal companies
$1.64Breported sold
62investors
9Form D filings
2010–2015active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Nov 3, 2015 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Eif Uspf is a sponsor group of 6 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 9 Form D filings between Jul 2010 and Nov 2015.

What this means One team, 6 deal companies, about 5 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.64B to 62 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (6). Issuers are based in MA (5), CA (1).

What this means $1.64B raised across the group, about $26.5M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: EIF Management, LLC (4 issuers, executive officer, entity), Andrew E. Schroeder (3 issuers, executive officer and promoter), D. Mitchell Coddington (3 issuers, executive officer and promoter), EIF US Power IV, LLC (3 issuers, executive officer, entity), Herbert Magid (3 issuers, executive officer and promoter) and 8 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Nov 3, 2015.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 24 court cases matching the name, 19 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 43 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 9 public filings for Eif Uspf and found 9 differences, 3 worth asking the sponsor about: Eif Uspf includes 4 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target; Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Principle Advisory Pty Ltd; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Eif Uspf has not run yet — it is joining a line of 24,700 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

24 cases: 12 dismissed, 8 judgment, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

CRT Wind LLC v. Northern States Power Company Minnesota dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:18-cv-06398 · Filed Sep 20, 2018 · Closed Jun 25, 2019 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of CRT Wind LLC v. Northern States Power Company Minnesota: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2019-06-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. TriVis, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:17-cv-00728 · Filed Mar 8, 2017 · Closed Jan 23, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Northern States Power Company v. TriVis, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-01-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Mayard v. Northern States Power Company dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:17-cv-00453 · Filed Feb 14, 2017 · Closed Feb 16, 2018 · Nature of suit: 480 Consumer Credit · Cause: 47:227(b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Role of Mayard v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-02-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
United States of America v. Northern States Power Co. judgment
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 3:17-cv-00016 · Filed Jan 10, 2017 · Closed Mar 1, 2017 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental matters
Role of United States of America v. Northern States Power Co.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-03-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
Palm v. Northern States Power Company dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:16-cv-04404 · Filed Dec 29, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Palm v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-03-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. TriVis, Inc. judgment
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:16-cv-02792 · Filed Aug 19, 2016 · Closed Mar 15, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Northern States Power Company v. TriVis, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-03-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. TriVis, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:16-cv-00051 · Filed Jan 8, 2016 · Closed Mar 14, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Role of Northern States Power Company v. TriVis, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-03-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. Wagner Construction, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:13-cv-01960 · Filed Jul 22, 2013 · Closed Feb 12, 2014 · Nature of suit: 380 Other personal property damage
Role of Northern States Power Company v. Wagner Construction, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-02-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
United States v. Northern States Power Company judgment
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 3:12-cv-00565 · Filed Aug 8, 2012 · Closed Oct 19, 2012 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental Matters · Cause: 42:6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Role of United States v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
enXco Development Corporation v. Northern States Power Company judgment
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:11-cv-01171 · Filed May 4, 2011 · Closed Apr 4, 2013 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of enXco Development Corporation v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-04-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. enXco Development Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:11-cv-01162 · Filed May 4, 2011 · Closed Apr 25, 2013 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Northern States Power Company v. enXco Development Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-04-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Lancaster v. Northern States Power Company judgment
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:11-cv-00619 · Filed Mar 10, 2011 · Closed Nov 10, 2011 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental Matters · Cause: 42:9601 CERCLA - Comprehensive Environ. Response, Comp. & Liability
Role of Lancaster v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-11-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Energy West, Incorporated v. United States Power Fund, L.P. dismissed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 1:09-cv-00591 · Filed Mar 18, 2009 · Closed Apr 18, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Energy West, Incorporated v. United States Power Fund, L.P.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-04-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:06-cv-03687 · Filed Sep 12, 2006 · Closed Dec 4, 2006 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Northern States Power Company v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-12-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
United States v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY judgment
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 3:03-cv-00330 · Filed Jun 18, 2003 · Closed Oct 21, 2003 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental Matters · Cause: No cause code entered
Role of United States v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2003-10-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
First Natl Corp v. Northrn States Power dismissed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 2:00-cv-00032 · Filed Mar 10, 2000 · Closed Oct 5, 2000 · Nature of suit: 380 Other personal property damage
Role of First Natl Corp v. Northrn States Power: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2000-10-05 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
In Re: Olympia Holding Corp v. Central States Power dismissed
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:93-cv-00736 · Filed May 20, 1993 · Closed Nov 1, 1996 · Nature of suit: 422 Bankruptcy appeals rule 28 USC 158
Role of In Re: Olympia Holding Corp v. Central States Power: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1996-11-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
CUMMINS MID STATES POWER CO v. MASON AND HANGER SILAS MASON judgment
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. · Filed Jan 17, 1992 · Closed Jun 26, 1992 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of CUMMINS MID STATES POWER CO v. MASON AND HANGER SILAS MASON: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1992-06-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
SOLBERG, JEANETTE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY judgment
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 3:91-cv-01070 · Filed Dec 24, 1991 · Closed Mar 19, 1992 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of SOLBERG, JEANETTE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1992-03-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
v. MID-STATES POWER EQUIPMENT COM dismissed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. · Filed Dec 28, 1989 · Closed Mar 26, 1990 · Nature of suit: 423 Bankruptcy withdrawal 28 USC 157
Role of v. MID-STATES POWER EQUIPMENT COM: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-03-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Johnson v. Northern States Power Company closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 4:76-cv-00036 · Filed Jun 3, 1976 · Closed Nov 22, 1977
Role of Johnson v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1977-11-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. North River Insurance Company, The closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 1:71-cv-01086 · Filed Jun 23, 1971 · Closed Oct 12, 1971
Role of Northern States Power Company v. North River Insurance Company, The: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1971-10-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
Meyer v. Northern States Power Company closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 4:61-cv-00387 · Filed Feb 4, 1961 · Closed Jun 5, 1961
Role of Meyer v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1961-06-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
H. v. Northern States Power Company closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 2:59-cv-03741 · Filed Sep 21, 1959 · Closed Mar 3, 1960
Role of H. v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1960-03-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Eif Uspf..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

19 cases: 19 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

White v. Northern States Power Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 1-07-00093 · Filed Jul 5, 2007 · Closed Apr 29, 2008
Role of White v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2008-04-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
Miller v. Northern States Power Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 04-57424 · Filed Dec 2, 2004 · Closed Sep 1, 2005
Role of Miller v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-09-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY v. KARLE closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 03-03187 · Filed Jun 20, 2003 · Closed Sep 26, 2003
Role of NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY v. KARLE: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-09-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Gordon E. Gouveia, Chapter 7 Trustee of Globe Buil v. Northern States Power Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · No. 02-06343 · Filed Dec 31, 2002 · Closed Mar 19, 2003
Role of Gordon E. Gouveia, Chapter 7 Trustee of Globe Buil v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-03-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
MONTAGUE S. CLAYBROOK, TRUSTEE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-01471 · Filed May 18, 2001 · Closed Nov 21, 2002
Role of MONTAGUE S. CLAYBROOK, TRUSTEE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-11-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Lanser v. Northern States Power Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · No. 01-02195 · Filed Feb 1, 2001 · Closed Mar 11, 2002
Role of Lanser v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-03-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
Compton v. Northern States Power Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 00-03286 · Filed May 15, 2000 · Closed Oct 13, 2000
Role of Compton v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2000-10-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
The Jennico Creditor Trust v. Northern States Power Company [NSP] closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 1-98-01198 · Filed Oct 23, 1998 · Closed Jun 27, 2001
Role of The Jennico Creditor Trust v. Northern States Power Company [NSP]: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-06-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
RAMETTE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 97-04032 · Filed Feb 5, 1997 · Closed Jul 31, 1997
Role of RAMETTE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-07-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
BUCKLEY v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 96-03224 · Filed Jul 16, 1996 · Closed Dec 9, 1996
Role of BUCKLEY v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-12-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Zappen, Trustee v. Northern States Power Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 1-95-01088 · Filed May 31, 1995 · Closed Dec 7, 1995
Role of Zappen, Trustee v. Northern States Power Company: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1995-12-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
SHIELDS v. NORTHERN STATES POWER CO closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 95-03097 · Filed May 11, 1995 · Closed Oct 30, 1995
Role of SHIELDS v. NORTHERN STATES POWER CO: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1995-10-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
METROPOLITAN STEEL FABRICATORS INC v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 94-04599 · Filed Dec 9, 1994 · Closed Apr 28, 1995
Role of METROPOLITAN STEEL FABRICATORS INC v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1995-04-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Pentagon Park Limited Partnership v. Northern States Power Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · No. 94-05111 · Filed May 26, 1994 · Closed Nov 30, 1994
Role of Pentagon Park Limited Partnership v. Northern States Power Co.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1994-11-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
RIES v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 93-03194 · Filed Aug 24, 1993 · Closed Oct 8, 1993
Role of RIES v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-10-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
RAMETTE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 92-04450 · Filed Dec 31, 1992 · Closed Jun 24, 1993
Role of RAMETTE v. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-06-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Uptown Market, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · No. 91-07101 · Filed Dec 16, 1991 · Closed Feb 20, 1992
Role of Uptown Market, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-02-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
Northern States Power Company v. Schmidt closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · No. 91-07081 · Filed Oct 1, 1991 · Closed Dec 10, 1992
Role of Northern States Power Company v. Schmidt: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-12-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
Southern States Power Corp. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · No. 85-01849 · Filed Aug 20, 1985 · Closed May 30, 1986
Role of Southern States Power Corp.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1986-05-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

9 differences found between the filings for Eif Uspf — 3 worth asking about (compared 9 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Nov 22, 2010 – Sep 17, 2015

Eif Uspf includes 4 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target

AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLC (last filing Sep 17, 2015; $75,000,000 sold of $232,000,000); EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P. (last filing Nov 8, 2011; $274,372,000 sold of $1,750,000,000); EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC (last filing Nov 8, 2011; $464,780,000 sold of $1,750,000,000); EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P. (last filing Nov 22, 2010; $536,052,000 sold of $1,750,000,000). Each has no filing in more than two years and reported under half its target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Nov 8, 2011

Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Principle Advisory Pty Ltd — EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC

Principle Advisory Pty Ltd is listed as receiving sales compensation on 1 filing (Nov 8, 2011) with no FINRA CRD number given.

What this means People paid to sell securities normally hold a FINRA registration with a CRD number. Without one we cannot look them up on BrokerCheck. Ask who they are and whether they are registered.

Form D/A · Nov 8, 2011 ↗BrokerCheck search: Principle Advisory Pty Ltd ↗EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Nov 8, 2011

Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Principle Advisory Services Pty Ltd — EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P.

Principle Advisory Services Pty Ltd is listed as receiving sales compensation on 1 filing (Nov 8, 2011) with no FINRA CRD number given.

What this means People paid to sell securities normally hold a FINRA registration with a CRD number. Without one we cannot look them up on BrokerCheck. Ask who they are and whether they are registered.

Form D/A · Nov 8, 2011 ↗BrokerCheck search: Principle Advisory Services Pty Ltd ↗EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 3, 2015

62 other issuers file from the same address — AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC

The address on file, 2000 Avenue of The Stars, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, is used by 63 issuers in our index across 6 sponsor groups; 62 are outside this group. It is on our registered-agent / shared-office list (208 issuers in 63 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many unrelated companies file from this address. Often a registered agent or a fund administrator; sometimes a shared office. Ask where the team actually works.

AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗EDGAR filer page · AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC ↗
Sources
Note · Jun 28, 2010 – Sep 17, 2015

4 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLC (latest filing Sep 17, 2015) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P. (latest filing Nov 8, 2011) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC (latest filing Nov 8, 2011) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P. (latest filing Nov 22, 2010)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Form D · Sep 17, 2015 ↗AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D/A · Nov 8, 2011 ↗EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 3, 2015

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC

The latest filing lists 2000 Avenue of The Stars, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA. That address is used by 208 issuers in our index (208 issuers in 63 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D · Nov 3, 2015 ↗AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 22, 2010 – Nov 3, 2015

Member companies list addresses in 2 different states

MA (5), CA (1). 1 member uses a registered-agent or shared-office address: AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC (2000 Avenue of The Stars, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA).

What this means A registered agent's address is a mailbox, not where the team works. The other address is more likely the real office — ask which one is.

Eif Uspf — sponsor group page ↗AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 13, 2010 – Nov 8, 2011

Issuer used a different name before — EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC

SEC records list prior names for this filer: EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, L.P.. The current name on file is "EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 13, 2010 – Nov 22, 2010

Issuer used a different name before — EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: United States Power Fund IV, L.P.. The current name on file is "EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

3 of 6 offerings report sales commissions totalling $61,375,000; 0 report finder's fees; 1 reports proceeds to related persons totalling $529,493. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Nov 3, 2015 D
AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLC
File 021-250604
$0$0$0 (est.)
Certain persons named in Item 3 or affiliate(s)thereof may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including management fees. The amounts of such payments cannot be estimated at this time.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 17, 2015 D
AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLC
File 021-247850
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 24, 2014 D
EIF CHANNELVIEW BLOCKER, LLC
File 021-212361
$0$0$529,493
The management fee to be paid to the Sole Member of the Manager of the Issuer.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Nov 8, 2011 D/A
EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLC
File 021-144860
$21,000,000 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Certain persons named in Item 3 or affiliate(s) thereof may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including management fees and/or performance allocations. The amounts of such fees cannot be estimated at this time.
Atlantic - Pacific Capital, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 38356 ↗
Principle Advisory Pty Ltd no CRD number reported		EDGAR ↗
Nov 8, 2011 D/A
EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P.
File 021-144861
$21,000,000 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Certain persons named in Item 3 or affiliate(s) thereof may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including management fees and/or performance allocations. The amounts of such fees cannot be estimated at this time.
Atlantic - Pacific Capital, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 38356 ↗
Principle Advisory Services Pty Ltd no CRD number reported		EDGAR ↗
Nov 22, 2010 D/A
EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P.
File 021-144859
$19,375,000 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Certain persons named in Item 3 or affiliate(s) thereof may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including management fees and/or performance allocations. The amounts of such fees cannot be estimated at this time.
Atlantic - Pacific Capital, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 38356 ↗EDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 6 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:34 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Eif Uspf in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:34 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2013–2026) — 767,007 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:34 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2013–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:34 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗EU EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEEDHAM, MAPooled Investment Fund2$464,780,0008$10,000,0002010–2011
EDGAR ↗EU EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business addressNEEDHAM, MAPooled Investment Fund2$536,052,00020$10,000,0002010–2010
EDGAR ↗EU EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEEDHAM, MAPooled Investment Fund2$274,372,00020$10,000,0002010–2011
EDGAR ↗EC EIF CHANNELVIEW BLOCKER, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business addressNEEDHAM, MAPooled Investment Fund1$163,072,846
offering $163,072,846 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
6
similar: 4–27
$10,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2014–2014
EDGAR ↗AL AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEEDHAM, MAPooled Investment Fund1$75,000,000
offering $232,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
4
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2015–2015
EDGAR ↗AL AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLCshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesLos Angeles, CAPooled Investment Fund1$128,307,791
offering $128,307,791 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
4
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2015–2015

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Nov 3, 2015AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR BLOCKER, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$128,307,791$128,307,791
EDGAR ↗Sep 17, 2015AEIF LINDEN CO-INVESTOR, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$232,000,000$75,000,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 24, 2014EIF CHANNELVIEW BLOCKER, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$163,072,846$163,072,846
EDGAR ↗Nov 8, 2011EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$1,750,000,000$274,372,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 8, 2011EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLCD/APooled Investment Fund$1,750,000,000$464,780,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 22, 2010EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$1,750,000,000$536,052,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 13, 2010EIF USPF IV Leveraged Feeder, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$1,750,000,000$270,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 13, 2010EIF USPF IV Blocker Fund, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$1,750,000,000$175,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 13, 2010EIF United States Power Fund IV, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$1,750,000,000$455,168,964

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Nov 3, 2015. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 6 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2010–2015).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
EM EIF Management, LLC entityExecutive Officer4Jul 13, 2010 → Feb 24, 2014
MT Mohan ThomasExecutive Officer3Feb 24, 2014 → Nov 3, 2015
HM Herbert MagidExecutive Officer, Promoter3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
AS Andrew E. SchroederExecutive Officer, Promoter3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
EU EIF US Power IV, LLC entityExecutive Officer3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
TD Terence L. DarbyExecutive Officer, Promoter3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
JB John E. Buehler, Jr.Executive Officer, Promoter3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
MS Mark D. SegelExecutive Officer, Promoter3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
DC D. Mitchell CoddingtonExecutive Officer, Promoter3Jul 13, 2010 → Nov 8, 2011
AL AEIF Linden GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer, Promoter2Sep 17, 2015 → Nov 3, 2015
AE Ares EIF Management, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Nov 3, 2015 → Nov 3, 2015
PA P. ARES EIF Managment, LLC entityExecutive Officer, Promoter1Sep 17, 2015 → Sep 17, 2015
EC EIF CHANNELVIEW GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Feb 24, 2014 → Feb 24, 2014

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Eif Uspf.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Eif Uspf as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Eif Uspf's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #356,972 of 374,652 in line (1,253 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NEEDHAM), MA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗Massachusetts MassCourts ↗California — find the county court ↗Los Angeles Superior Court case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

Massachusetts Secretary of State business search ↗California Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗