48 cases: 2 open, 17 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 23 dismissed, 6 judgment
Potash v. Patriot Fire Protection Inc open
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 3:26-cv-06031 · Filed Sep 10, 2026
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in WA (not a filing state)
Potash Bros., Inc. v. Owners Insurance Company open
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:25-cv-11438 · Filed Sep 22, 2025
Role of Potash Bros., Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Potash v. Target Corporation closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:23-cv-10283 · Filed Sep 12, 2023 · Closed Jan 21, 2025
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2025-01-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Potash v. Monsanto Company, Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:21-cv-01041 · Filed Feb 10, 2021 · Closed May 27, 2022
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2022-05-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Potash v. Monsanto Company, Inc closed
District Court, N.D. Iowa · No. 5:20-cv-04061 · Filed Dec 23, 2020 · Closed Feb 8, 2021
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-02-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IA (not a filing state)
Potash v. Home Point Financial Corporation dismissed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 9:18-cv-81552 · Filed Nov 13, 2018 · Closed Mar 29, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
480 Consumer Credit
· Cause:
15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-03-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Hinshaw v. Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan INC. dismissed
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · No. 4:13-cv-00040 · Filed Feb 14, 2013 · Closed Nov 6, 2014 ·
Nature of suit:
864 S.S.I.D.
Role of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan INC.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2014-11-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NC (not a filing state)
SecNet Holding LLC v. Potash dismissed
District Court, D. Delaware · No. 1:12-cv-00078 · Filed Jan 25, 2012 · Closed Aug 14, 2012 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2012-08-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in DE (not a filing state)
Potash v. Bank of New York Mellon closed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. 3:11-cv-00770 · Filed Oct 24, 2011 · Closed May 11, 2012 ·
Nature of suit:
Real Property: Foreclosure
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2012-05-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NV (not a filing state)
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. v. BHP Billiton Ltd. dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:10-cv-06024 · Filed Sep 22, 2010 · Closed Nov 16, 2010 ·
Nature of suit:
850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2010-11-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Chicago Title Land Trust Company v. Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. judgment
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:10-cv-05344 · Filed Aug 24, 2010 · Closed Apr 12, 2011 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2011-04-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Potash v. Goldman Sachs & Co. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:03-cv-04258 · Filed Jun 11, 2003 · Closed Jul 31, 2003 ·
Nature of suit:
850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2003-07-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
Barton v. Potash Saskatch Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 7:03-cv-00076 · Filed Apr 4, 2003 · Closed Jun 6, 2003 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Saskatch Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2003-06-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Potash v. Xcel Energy Inc dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:02-cv-03715 · Filed Sep 26, 2002 · Closed May 24, 2005 ·
Nature of suit:
850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2005-05-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Jordan v. Potash Bros Inc dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:02-cv-05340 · Filed Jul 29, 2002 · Closed Aug 15, 2005 ·
Nature of suit:
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Potash Bros Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2005-08-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Potash v. Tellabs Inc dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:02-cv-05010 · Filed Jul 16, 2002 · Closed Sep 20, 2002 ·
Nature of suit:
850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2002-09-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Potash v. NVIDIA Corporation dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 4:02-cv-00900 · Filed Feb 22, 2002 · Closed Aug 21, 2003 ·
Nature of suit:
850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2003-08-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Potash v. CVS Corporation closed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:01-cv-11732 · Filed Oct 9, 2001 · Closed Feb 15, 2002 ·
Nature of suit:
160 Stockholder's suits
Role of Potash:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2002-02-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MA (not a filing state)
Williams v. Potash Corp closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:99-cv-01970 · Filed Mar 25, 1999 · Closed Mar 25, 1999
Role of Potash Corp:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Kesser v. Potash Corp of closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:99-cv-01968 · Filed Mar 25, 1999 · Closed Mar 25, 1999
Role of Potash Corp of:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Campbell v. Potash Corp of closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:99-cv-01967 · Filed Mar 25, 1999 · Closed Mar 25, 1999
Role of Potash Corp of:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Potash Corporation v. The M/V Corse dismissed
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · No. 4:97-cv-00195 · Filed Oct 31, 1997 · Closed Apr 17, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-04-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NC (not a filing state)
Lance v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 2:97-cv-02954 · Filed Oct 14, 1997 · Closed Feb 12, 1999 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-02-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
CAMPBELL v. POTASH CORPORATION closed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. · Filed May 7, 1997 · Closed Dec 1, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of POTASH CORPORATION:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-12-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Williams v. Potash Corporation judgment
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 2:97-cv-02428 · Filed May 7, 1997 · Closed Dec 1, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-12-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Alyea v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 2:97-cv-02427 · Filed May 7, 1997 · Closed Feb 11, 1999 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-02-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Kesser v. Potash Corporation judgment
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 2:97-cv-02426 · Filed May 7, 1997 · Closed Dec 1, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-12-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Campbell v. Potash Corporation judgment
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 2:97-cv-02425 · Filed May 7, 1997 · Closed Dec 27, 2001 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2001-12-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Marcelline Farm Sup v. Potash Corp of Sas dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:94-cv-00928 · Filed Jul 28, 1994 · Closed Jan 25, 1995 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corp of Sas:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1995-01-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Neve Brothers v. Potash Corporation closed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:94-cv-00649 · Filed Jun 30, 1994 · Closed Aug 26, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-08-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Neve Brothers v. Potash Corporation closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:94-cv-01462 · Filed Apr 28, 1994 · Closed Jun 17, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-06-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
ASHTA Chemicals Inc. v. Potash Saskatchewan dismissed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 4:94-cv-00826 · Filed Apr 20, 1994 · Closed May 3, 1995 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Saskatchewan:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1995-05-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (OH)
Tolley's Inc v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00556 · Filed Sep 8, 1993 · Closed Feb 15, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-02-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Reamford Liquid v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00555 · Filed Sep 1, 1993 · Closed Feb 15, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-02-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Tolley's, Inc. v. Potash Corp., Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Virginia · No. 6:93-cv-00040 · Filed Jun 9, 1993 · Closed Sep 2, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corp., Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-09-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in VA (not a filing state)
Reamford Liquid v. Potash Corp of closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:93-cv-03049 · Filed May 20, 1993 · Closed Aug 26, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corp of:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
T & C Self-Serve Inc v. Potash Corporation closed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00270 · Filed Apr 27, 1993 · Closed Aug 27, 1993
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
El Toro Farms v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00265 · Filed Apr 23, 1993 · Closed Aug 27, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Killebrew v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00273 · Filed Apr 23, 1993 · Closed Jul 12, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-07-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Laing-Gro Fertilizer v. Potash Corporation closed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00223 · Filed Apr 7, 1993 · Closed Aug 27, 1993
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Clearbrook AG Svc v. Potash Corporation closed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00236 · Filed Apr 5, 1993 · Closed Aug 27, 1993
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
A.G.-Network, Inc. v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00240 · Filed Apr 5, 1993 · Closed Aug 27, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Gier's Farm Service v. Potash Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:93-cv-00209 · Filed Apr 2, 1993 · Closed Aug 27, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Potash Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-08-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
BLOMKEST FERTILIZER, ET AL v. POTASH CORPORATION, ET AL judgment
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. · Filed Apr 1, 1993 · Closed Jan 3, 1997 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of POTASH CORPORATION:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1997-01-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
POTASH CORPORATION v. ASHTA CHEMICALS INC. dismissed
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:93-cv-00976 · Filed Mar 9, 1993 · Closed May 31, 1995 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of POTASH CORPORATION:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1995-05-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NJ (not a filing state)
Homestake Mining Co. v. Potash Corp of Saska dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:91-cv-05818 · Filed Sep 13, 1991 · Closed Apr 30, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Potash Corp of Saska:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-04-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
TELEVIDEO SYSTEMS v. POTASH & PODOR CO dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. · Filed Jul 1, 1987 · Closed Dec 8, 1987 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of POTASH & PODOR CO:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1987-12-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
SCHER BROS INC v. POTASH ETAL judgment
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. · Filed Oct 10, 1985 · Closed Aug 18, 1988 ·
Nature of suit:
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of POTASH ETAL:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-08-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for both plaintiff and defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 104 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NJ (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:47 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.