ROBERT NOBLE

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California docket "Edward Joseph Hernandez and Evey Lee Hernandez" filed Oct 13, 2005, closed Apr 19, 2006. JOHN EVEY (listed on the same filings) is listed as Debtor ("Edward Joseph Hernandez and Evey Lee Hernandez"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

The Jun 10, 2011 Form D lists Jay S. Potter as director of the issuer and also as a person receiving sales compensation (CRD 1585351). Sales commissions reported on this filing: $420,000.

What this means The same person is listed as running the company and as being paid to sell its securities. Ask how much and on what terms.

Beam Global (last filing Sep 16, 2022; $1,453,500 sold of $30,300,000); NOBLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (last filing Oct 12, 2018; $6,000,000 sold of $22,000,000). Each has no filing in more than two years and reported under half its target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NOBLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (latest filing Oct 12, 2018) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NOBLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (latest filing Jan 29, 2018) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NOBLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (latest filing Aug 22, 2017) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NOBLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (latest filing Aug 22, 2017) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NOBLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (latest filing Nov 18, 2016) · and 14 more

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

The Oct 20, 2015 filing lists ROBERT NOBLE as executive officer, director; the Mar 30, 2016 Form D/A lists director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

The Jun 10, 2011 filing lists ROBERT NOBLE as director; the Oct 5, 2012 Form D lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

The Jul 28, 2010 filing lists ROBERT NOBLE as executive officer, director; the Sep 14, 2011 Form D lists director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

The Jan 28, 2014 filing says $2,000,000 offered; the Aug 27, 2014 Form D/A says $4,000,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

The Jan 15, 2013 filing says $1,300,000 offered; the Feb 13, 2013 Form D/A says $2,190,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

The May 11, 2015 filing lists a minimum of $500,000; the Aug 4, 2015 Form D/A lists $100,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

"Energy Conservation" (Jun 24, 2010 to Sep 14, 2011); then "Other Technology" (Mar 29, 2012 to Aug 14, 2015).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

"$1 - $1,000,000" (Jun 10, 2011); then "Decline to Disclose" (Jan 29, 2018).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

"$1 - $1,000,000" (Jun 24, 2010); then "$1,000,001 - $5,000,000" (Mar 29, 2012); then "$1 - $1,000,000" (Jan 15, 2013); then "$1,000,001 - $5,000,000" (Aug 14, 2015).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.