13 cases: 13 closed (disposition not in docket feed)
Rouge Steel Company v. Glunt Industries closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 05-51295 · Filed May 4, 2005 · Closed Jan 30, 2006
Role of Glunt Industries:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-01-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in DE (not a filing state)
NSC Creditor Trust v. Glunt Industries, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 04-01030 · Filed Mar 4, 2004 · Closed Jul 22, 2005
Role of Glunt Industries, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2005-07-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Glunt Industries Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-09435 · Filed Sep 26, 2003 · Closed Jan 14, 2008
Role of Glunt Industries Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2008-01-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
Suhar v. Glunt Industries, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 03-04277 · Filed Aug 5, 2003 · Closed Jun 20, 2006
Role of Glunt Industries, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-06-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
LTV Steel Company, Inc. v. Glunt Industries, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 02-04728 · Filed Dec 10, 2002 · Closed May 12, 2004
Role of Glunt Industries, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2004-05-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Glunt Industries, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 06-03169 · Filed Nov 13, 2002 · Closed May 6, 2008
Role of Glunt Industries, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2008-05-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Glunt Industries, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 02-04320 · Filed Nov 13, 2002 · Closed Mar 8, 2006
Role of Glunt Industries, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-03-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Glunt v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 00-05100 · Filed Jun 2, 2000 · Closed Aug 17, 2000
Role of Glunt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-08-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Chemical Bank v. Glunt closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:94-ap-01948 · Filed Aug 10, 1994 · Closed Nov 21, 1994
Role of Glunt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1994-11-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Whitaker v. Schaumburg-glunt Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-28138 · Filed Dec 14, 1992 · Closed Apr 6, 1993
Role of Schaumburg-glunt Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1993-04-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); different first name (schaumburg); court in the person's filing state (FL)
Whitaker v. Schaumberg-glunt Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-25956 · Filed Oct 15, 1992 · Closed Dec 28, 1994
Role of Schaumberg-glunt Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1994-12-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); different first name (schaumberg); court in the person's filing state (FL)
Whitaker v. Schaumburg-glunt Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:91-ap-01359 · Filed Aug 29, 1991 · Closed Jan 6, 1992
Role of Schaumburg-glunt Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1992-01-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); different first name (schaumburg); court in the person's filing state (FL)
Household Finance Corporation v. Glunt closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · No. 91-00563 · Filed Jun 28, 1991 · Closed Aug 26, 1991
Role of Glunt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1991-08-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 23 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (FL)
What was searched
Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:48 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.