PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:27 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Person

AK
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)

AMIT KUMAR

Named as an officer, director or promoter on SEC Form D filings · CO · Aug 29, 2011 → Sep 6, 2022

1deal (issuers)
$32Mreported sold
12investors
20Form D filings
2011–2022years on file
Follow this personLook further ↓PDF

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:24 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

AMIT KUMAR is listed as a director on 20 SEC Form D filings by 1 issuer between Aug 2011 and Sep 2022: Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (Thornton, CO — other technology — 2011–2022; $32M reported sold to 12 investors).

What this means One deal on file with the SEC. A Form D is the notice a company files after it starts selling a private investment — it is a notice, not an approval.

Listed alongside KIM HUNTLEY (20 shared filings), G. THOMAS MARSH (19 shared filings), VICTOR LEE (18 shared filings), BIAO """WINSTON""" XU (17 shared filings), BILL GREGORAK (5 shared filings) and 7 others.

What this means These are the other officers, directors or promoters the companies named on the same forms — the team around AMIT. Each name links to their own page.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA) — 1 court case matching the name, 5 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 6 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 20 public filings for AMIT KUMAR and found 9 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: 8 Form Ds were filed more than 15 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for AMIT KUMAR has not run yet — it is joining a line of 16,604 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

1 case: 1 open

Amit Kumar v. Edlow open
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:25-cv-08752 · Filed Oct 13, 2025
Role of Amit Kumar: Plaintiff · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (a name found in 7 federal dockets); 4 people with this name in Form D filings; court in CA (not a filing state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:24 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched AMIT KUMAR..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

5 cases: 1 open, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Amit Kumar and Barbara Jean Rowley open
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · No. 26-31460 · Filed Sep 16, 2026
Role of Amit Kumar and Barbara Jean Rowley: Debtor · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (a name found in 7 federal dockets); 4 people with this name in Form D filings; court in IN (not a filing state)
Amit Kumar closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 19-26323 · Filed Oct 8, 2019 · Closed Jan 24, 2020
Role of Amit Kumar: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2020-01-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (a name found in 7 federal dockets); 4 people with this name in Form D filings; court in CA (not a filing state)
AMIT KUMAR closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · No. 12-22995 · Filed Nov 22, 2012 · Closed Mar 4, 2013
Role of AMIT KUMAR: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2013-03-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (a name found in 7 federal dockets); 4 people with this name in Form D filings; court in NV (not a filing state)
Amit Kumar closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · No. 1-11-45508 · Filed Jun 27, 2011 · Closed Oct 5, 2011
Role of Amit Kumar: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2011-10-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (a name found in 7 federal dockets); 4 people with this name in Form D filings; court in NY (not a filing state)
Amit Kumar closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 09-04446 · Filed Apr 15, 2009 · Closed Jul 15, 2010
Role of Amit Kumar: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2010-07-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (a name found in 7 federal dockets); 4 people with this name in Form D filings; court in MI (not a filing state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:24 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

Comparisons cover issuers and sponsor groups — see the issuer pages under Deals

9 differences found between the filings for AMIT KUMAR — 1 worth asking about (compared 20 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Aug 12, 2011 – Sep 6, 2022

8 Form Ds were filed more than 15 days after the first sale

Form D filed 72 days after the first sale — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. · Form D filed 63 days after the first sale — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. · Form D filed 18 days after the first sale — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. · Form D filed 18 days after the first sale — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. · Form D filed 18 days after the first sale — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. · and 3 more

What this means Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves. A pattern of late paperwork is worth asking the sponsor about.

Form D · Jan 30, 2015 ↗Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D · Jun 3, 2014 ↗Form D · Sep 6, 2022 ↗
Sources
Note · Sep 22, 2015 – Oct 1, 2015

Offering amount changed between filings — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

The Sep 22, 2015 filing says $1,500,000 offered; the Oct 1, 2015 Form D/A says $2,000,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Form D (earlier) · Sep 22, 2015 ↗Form D/A (later) · Oct 1, 2015 ↗Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Apr 29, 2016 – May 6, 2016

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (latest filing May 6, 2016)

The latest filing for this offering is dated May 6, 2016 (first sale Apr 29, 2016). It reports $500,000 sold of $2,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · May 6, 2016 ↗Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Aug 12, 2011 – Aug 29, 2011

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (latest filing Aug 29, 2011)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Aug 29, 2011 (first sale Aug 12, 2011). It reports $7,360,000 sold of $22,085,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Aug 29, 2011 ↗Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Aug 29, 2011

Industry group changed between filings — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

"Manufacturing" (Aug 29, 2011); then "Other Technology" (Aug 29, 2011 to Sep 6, 2022).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

Form D/A · Aug 29, 2011 ↗Form D · Aug 29, 2011 ↗Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Apr 6, 2009 – Aug 11, 2026

Same name, different state: "Amit Kumar" (CA) is a separate record

This page covers filings where the address state is CO. A separate record, "Amit Kumar" with address state CA, is listed on 18 filings — most recently by Accel 17 L.P. (Aug 11, 2026). Both records have filings in the same period (Aug 29, 2011 to Sep 6, 2022).

What this means Two records with one name were active at the same time. That can be one person listing different company addresses, or two different people. We keep them apart until a filing ties them together. Check both pages before you decide.

Amit Kumar (CA) — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D · Aug 11, 2026 ↗Accel 17 L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗AMIT KUMAR (CO) — this page ↗
Sources
Note · Feb 4, 2013 – Jul 31, 2024

Same name, different state: "Amit Kumar, PhD" (NY) is a separate record

This page covers filings where the address state is CO. A separate record, "Amit Kumar, PhD" with address state NY, is listed on 4 filings — most recently by TherapyMatch, Inc. (Jul 31, 2024). Both records have filings in the same period (Feb 4, 2013 to Sep 6, 2022).

What this means Two records with one name were active at the same time. That can be one person listing different company addresses, or two different people. We keep them apart until a filing ties them together. Check both pages before you decide.

Amit Kumar, PhD (NY) — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D · Jul 31, 2024 ↗TherapyMatch, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗AMIT KUMAR (CO) — this page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 8, 2017 – Jun 3, 2024

Same name, different state: "Amit Kumar" (A1) is a separate record

This page covers filings where the address state is CO. A separate record, "Amit Kumar" with address state A1, is listed on 8 filings — most recently by BLACKROCK SILVER CORP. (Jun 3, 2024). Both records have filings in the same period (Mar 8, 2017 to Sep 6, 2022).

What this means Two records with one name were active at the same time. That can be one person listing different company addresses, or two different people. We keep them apart until a filing ties them together. Check both pages before you decide.

Amit Kumar (A1) — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D · Jun 3, 2024 ↗BLACKROCK SILVER CORP. — PartnerFacts page ↗AMIT KUMAR (CO) — this page ↗
Sources
Note · Aug 29, 2011 – Sep 6, 2022

Reported revenue range changed between filings — Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

"$1,000,001 - $5,000,000" (Aug 29, 2011); then "$1 - $1,000,000" (Aug 29, 2011); then "$1,000,001 - $5,000,000" (Jul 2, 2013); then "$5,000,001 - $25,000,000" (Sep 22, 2015); then "$1,000,001 - $5,000,000" (Sep 6, 2022).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Form D/A · Aug 29, 2011 ↗Form D · Aug 29, 2011 ↗Form D · Jul 2, 2013 ↗Form D · Sep 22, 2015 ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 16 offerings report sales commissions; 1 reports finder's fees totalling $1,575,000; 0 report proceeds to related persons.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Sep 6, 2022 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-458065
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 14, 2017 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-280683
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 28, 2016 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-273393
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 4, 2016 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-271766
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 15, 2016 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-265033
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 6, 2016 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-262696
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Nov 18, 2015 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-251423
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Nov 5, 2015 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-250788
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 1, 2015 D/A
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-247980
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 22, 2015 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-247972
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 30, 2015 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-233178
$0$1,575,000$0Westpark Capital, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 39914 ↗
via Jonathan H. Blum (CRD 2352935 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
Jan 23, 2015 D/A
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-224729
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 6, 2014 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-222359
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 3, 2014 D
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-218475
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 27, 2013 D/A
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-198935
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 29, 2011 D/A
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
File 021-165084
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across every filing this person is listed on (latest filing per offering, per issuer).

Deals 1

Every issuer that named Amit Kumar on a Form D, newest first. A Form D is the notice a company files after it starts selling a private investment.

AS
Other Technology

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.

Thornton, CO · Aug 29, 2011 → Sep 6, 2022 · 20 filings
  • Sep 6, 2022 · D · $5,000,000 sold of $5,000,000 · 1 investors · min. $5,000,000 · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Feb 14, 2017 · D · $20,000,000 sold of $20,000,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Oct 28, 2016 · D · $1,000,000 sold of $1,000,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Oct 4, 2016 · D · $1,350,000 sold of $1,350,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Jun 15, 2016 · D · $2,500,000 sold of $2,500,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • May 6, 2016 · D · $500,000 sold of $2,000,000 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Nov 18, 2015 · D · $0 sold of $32,200,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Nov 5, 2015 · D · $2,800,000 sold of $2,800,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Oct 1, 2015 · D/A · $2,000,000 sold of $2,000,000 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Sep 22, 2015 · D · $1,500,000 sold of $1,500,000 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Sep 22, 2015 · D · $1,500,000 sold of $1,500,000 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Jan 30, 2015 · D · $32,000,000 sold of $32,000,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Jan 23, 2015 · D/A · $7,990,002 sold of $7,990,002 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Sep 15, 2014 · D · $4,000,002 sold of $7,990,002 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Aug 6, 2014 · D · $3,960,000 sold of $3,960,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Jun 3, 2014 · D · $6,000,000 sold of $6,000,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Aug 27, 2013 · D/A · $7,425,000 sold of $7,425,000 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Jul 2, 2013 · D · $2,425,000 sold of $7,425,000 · 2 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Aug 29, 2011 · D/A · $7,360,000 sold of $22,085,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗
  • Aug 29, 2011 · D · $7,360,000 sold of $22,085,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Director EDGAR ↗

Raised $32M from 12 investors (100% of the $5M target) as of the latest filing. Amit is listed as director on 20 filings for this deal.

Latest filing on EDGAR ↗
Sources

Every row is a Form D or D/A on which the issuer listed this name as a related person. Amount sold and investors are the maximum reported on any filing for this issuer. "Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other Technology / 506(b) (17,390 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Other pages with the same name (3)

Separate person records under the same name, not combined with this page. Each line says whether it shares an issuer with this record.

  • Amit Kumar — CA, 9 issuers, Apr 6, 2009 → Aug 11, 2026 · no shared issuer
  • Amit Kumar, PhD — NY, 2 issuers, Feb 4, 2013 → Jul 31, 2024 · no shared issuer
  • Amit Kumar — British Columbia, Canada (as filed: A1), 1 issuer, Mar 8, 2017 → Jun 3, 2024 · no shared issuer

People around Amit 12

Officers, directors, promoters and management entities named on the same filings, as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET.

KH
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

KIM HUNTLEY

Director · 20 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

GM
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

G. THOMAS MARSH

Director · 19 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

VL
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

VICTOR LEE

Executive Officer, Director · 18 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

BX
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

BIAO """WINSTON""" XU

Director · 17 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

BG
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

BILL GREGORAK

Executive Officer · 5 shared filings (1 issuer) · also on 1 other issuer

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

GG
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

GARY GATCHELL

Executive Officer · 4 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

RS
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

RICHARD J. SWANSON

Director · 2 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

RE
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

RON ELLER

Executive Officer, Director · 2 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

HK
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

HANS OLAV KVALVAAG

Director · 2 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

DP
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

David Peterson

Director · 1 shared filing (1 issuer) · also on 1 other issuer

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

WC
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Will Clarke

Director · 1 shared filing (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

MG
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Mike Gilbreth

Executive Officer · 1 shared filing (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Kumar. Their page shows their other deals.

The team behind the deals

Same business address

1 other issuer file from the same address

A shared address can mean the same team, a shared office building or a registered agent. It is a lead, not a conclusion.

Registrations and other filings

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

None of the 1 issuer this person is listed on appears in Form ADV (searched 24,962 advisers as of Oct 2, 2026). A person is never an adviser firm; Form ADV is checked for the issuers and the management companies they are listed with.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Property records none — individuals are not matched

Property records are matched to companies only, never to individuals, so none are matched to AMIT KUMAR by design. Searched property records in Hillsborough County FL (Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026 + FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Harris County TX (HCAD 2026 ownership roll), Dallas County TX (DCAD 2026 ownership roll), New York City ACRIS documents and PLUTO ownership rows already retrieved for other issuers, Cook County IL sale and ownership rows already retrieved for other issuers (814,874 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET) for the 1 issuer this person is listed on — nothing matched.

Public profiles and social

Websites and social links of the issuers Amit Kumar is listed on: none on file. No website or social profile named in Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.'s SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #44,104 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (Thornton, CO). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn people search ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗Colorado state courts — find the court ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

Colorado Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Every fact links to its public-record source. Plain-English notes next to a fact are our reading of that fact, not a rating. Request a correction · Facts policy

Request a correction

Free. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Add a response

If this is you or your firm, add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Monitor this person

Members get an email when AMIT KUMAR appears on a new Form D, or when a court case or SEC action is matched to them. See plans →