Veriteq

The filing says the first sale was Jan 28, 2015. The Form D was filed Mar 10, 2015 — 41 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 26 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

The filing says the first sale was Nov 3, 2014. The Form D was filed Dec 11, 2014 — 38 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 23 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

The filing says the first sale was Jul 12, 2012. The Form D was filed Aug 1, 2012 — 20 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 5 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Scott R. Silverman's role changed at VERITEQ: executive officer, director → executive officer, director, promoter · Michael E. Krawitz's role changed at VERITEQ: executive officer, director → executive officer · Michael E. Krawitz's role changed at VERITEQ: executive officer → executive officer, director · Michael E. Krawitz's role changed at VERITEQ: executive officer, director → executive officer · Michael E. Krawitz's role changed at VERITEQ: executive officer → executive officer, director · and 8 more

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported. Ask who runs the company today.

The May 7, 2010 filing says $4,200,000 offered; the Mar 18, 2011 Form D/A says $8,700,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

The Oct 6, 2009 filing says $10,000,000 offered; the Feb 17, 2010 Form D says $620,100.

What this means The target raise got smaller. That can mean the plan shrank or the sponsor stopped early. Ask what changed in the deal.

The Mar 31, 2009 filing says $237,520 offered; the Jun 17, 2009 Form D says $950,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — VERITEQ (latest filing Dec 15, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — VERITEQ (latest filing Sep 4, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — VERITEQ (latest filing Aug 13, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — VERITEQ (latest filing Aug 13, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — VERITEQ (latest filing Jul 28, 2014) · and 12 more

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Shawn A. Wooden is written 2 different ways on the filings · Daniel E. Penni is written 2 different ways on the filings · Lorraine Breece is written 2 different ways on the filings · Michael E. Krawitz is written 2 different ways on the filings

What this means Middle names and suffixes come and go on these forms. Check full legal names against your documents.

"Manufacturing" (Oct 19, 2010 to Sep 7, 2012); then "Other Technology" (Jul 16, 2013 to Mar 10, 2015).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

The people listed on the Sep 7, 2012 filing give New London, CT; on the Jul 16, 2013 filing they give Delray Beach, FL.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

The people listed on the May 9, 2011 filing give South Saint Paul, MN; on the Sep 7, 2012 filing they give New London, CT.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

"$25,000,001 - $100,000,000" (Oct 19, 2010); then "$1,000,001 - $5,000,000" (Sep 7, 2012); then "No Revenues" (Jul 16, 2013); then "$1 - $1,000,000" (Nov 27, 2013).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

"Decline to Disclose" (Oct 6, 2009); then "No Revenues" (May 28, 2013).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Delaware (3), Florida (1) — out of 4 member issuers. The odd ones out: VeriTeQ Acquisition Corp (Florida).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: DIGITAL ANGEL CORP; APPLIED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS INC; APPLIED CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY INC. The current name on file is "VERITEQ".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: VeriChip CORP. The current name on file is "POSITIVEID Corp".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: IFTH ACQUISITION CORP; INFOTECH USA INC; SYSCOMM INTERNATIONAL CORP. The current name on file is "Steel Vault Corp".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.