PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 6:48 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

T

Titan

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Scottsdale, AZ

Grouped because: 1 shared person, same business address (2 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$760Kreported sold
7investors
2Form D filings
2023–2025active
1new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Dec 2, 2025 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Titan is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 2 Form D filings between Aug 2023 and Dec 2025.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 2 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $760K to 7 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Commercial (1), Oil and Gas (1). Issuers are based in AZ (2).

What this means $760K raised across the group, about $109K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Catherine Bell (2 issuers, executive officer), Jason Munson (1 issuer, executive officer), Katie Kim (1 issuer, executive officer), Laura Miller (1 issuer, executive officer), Nika Robak (1 issuer, executive officer) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 1 new offering in the last 12 months; latest filing Dec 2, 2025.

What this means still raising money this year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, LA, ME, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, NH, NM, OR, RI, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 24 court cases matching the name, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 26 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 2 public filings for Titan and found 3 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: 53% of the money raised went to insiders; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Titan has not run yet — it is joining a line of 20,185 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 280 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

24 cases: 9 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 5 judgment, 10 dismissed

Titan Corp. v. Chambers closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:24-cv-04932 · Filed Oct 29, 2024 · Closed Nov 20, 2024
Role of Titan Corp.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2024-11-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Titan Corp v. Oredola closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:24-cv-03761 · Filed Aug 23, 2024 · Closed Sep 18, 2024 · Nature of suit: 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment · Cause: 28:1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Role of Titan Corp: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2024-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Logistica Solutions USA Inc. v. Titan LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, D. South Carolina · No. 2:23-cv-02605 · Filed Jun 9, 2023 · Closed Feb 20, 2024 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Titan LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2024-02-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
The Titan Corporation v. Support Systems Associates, Inc. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 6:05-cv-01533 · Filed Oct 13, 2005 · Closed Sep 6, 2007 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of The Titan Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2007-09-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023
Electronic Consulting Services, Inc. v. The Titan Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:05-cv-00728 · Filed Jun 21, 2005 · Closed Jul 3, 2005 · Nature of suit: 380 Other personal property damage
Role of The Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-07-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VA (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023
SALEH v. TITAN CORPORATION closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:05-cv-01165 · Filed Jun 10, 2005 · Closed Sep 17, 2010 · Nature of suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization · Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Role of TITAN CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-09-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023
Dalkilic v. Titan Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:05-cv-00916 · Filed Apr 29, 2005 · Closed Jan 25, 2008 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2008-01-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023
Al Rawi v. Titan Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:05-cv-00427 · Filed Apr 14, 2005 · Closed Jan 13, 2006 · Nature of suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization · Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2006-01-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VA (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023
United States v. Titan Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:05-cr-00314 · Filed Mar 1, 2005 · Closed Mar 1, 2005
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-03-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023; criminal docket
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. TITAN CORPORATION judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:05-cv-00411 · Filed Mar 1, 2005 · Closed Mar 30, 2005 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of TITAN CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-03-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2023
Al Rawi v. Titan Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:04-cv-01143 · Filed Jun 9, 2004 · Closed Mar 21, 2005 · Nature of suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization · Cause: 18:1961
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-03-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2023
Cheung v. Titan Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:04-cv-00701 · Filed Apr 6, 2004 · Closed Dec 20, 2005 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:0078
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-12-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2023
McBride v. Titan Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:04-cv-00676 · Filed Apr 2, 2004 · Closed Dec 20, 2005 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:0078
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-12-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2023
The Titan Corp. v. GlobalNet Systems dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:03-cv-05657 · Filed Jul 30, 2003 · Closed Aug 29, 2003 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of The Titan Corp.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2003-08-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2023
Perimex Intl Corp v. Titan Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:03-cv-01037 · Filed May 22, 2003 · Closed Apr 27, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-04-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2023
Adams v. Titan Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:01-cv-01227 · Filed Aug 6, 2001 · Closed Sep 7, 2001 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2001-09-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VA (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2023
Titan Corp Ltd v. Custable dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:01-cv-04367 · Filed Jun 11, 2001 · Closed Jun 14, 2001 · Nature of suit: 160 Stockholder's suits
Role of Titan Corp Ltd: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-06-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: lack of jurisdiction Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2023
Adams v. Titan Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:01-cv-00869 · Filed May 18, 2001 · Closed Jul 31, 2001 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2001-07-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2023
TITAN CORPORATION v. PRYT, ET AL dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:95-cv-3775 · Filed Nov 20, 1995 · Closed Mar 6, 1996 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of TITAN CORPORATION: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1996-03-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1995, issuer incorporated 2023
TITAN, INC. v. TRANSAMERICA PREMIER dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:93-cv-02194 · Filed Oct 25, 1993 · Closed May 3, 1994 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of TITAN, INC.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1994-05-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2023
Titan Corporation v. Houston Satellite dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:93-cv-00605 · Filed Apr 21, 1993 · Closed Dec 7, 1993 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Titan Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1993-12-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2023
The Titan Corp v. M A Com Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:93-cv-00335 · Filed Mar 1, 1993 · Closed Jan 22, 1996 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of The Titan Corp: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1996-01-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2023
Titan Corporation v. Admiral Air Express dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:90-cv-00634 · Filed May 16, 1990 · Closed Jun 8, 1990 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Titan Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1990-06-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1990, issuer incorporated 2023
Buffalo Manufacturing Incorporated v. Titan, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · No. 2:85-cv-00480 · Filed Apr 19, 1985 · Closed Apr 19, 1985
Role of Titan, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1985-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WV (not the issuer's state); filed 1985, issuer incorporated 2023
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: NV (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Titan..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, KS, MI, NE, NV (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

2 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Texas A&M University v. Titan Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · No. 04-90076 · Filed Feb 25, 2004 · Closed Apr 7, 2004
Role of Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2004-04-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2023
World Access Inc v. The Titan Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Titan)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 03-01704 · Filed Apr 22, 2003 · Closed Jul 21, 2003
Role of The Titan Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2003-07-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2023
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

3 differences found between the filings for Titan — 1 worth asking about (compared 2 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Dec 2, 2025

53% of the money raised went to insiders — Pumps & Pumps Oil Fund, Limited Partnership

The Dec 2, 2025 Form D reports $760,000 sold and $400,000 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters (marked as an estimate). Issuer's note: "Fund will pay Managing Partner a one-time Organization and Management Fee of 4% of committed capital at Final Closing Date as compensation for efforts organizing, providing administrative services to ".

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Sources
Note · Aug 7, 2023

Last filing Aug 7, 2023 with 0% of the target sold — TITAN 23 LLC

TITAN 23 LLC (last filing Aug 7, 2023; $0 sold of $20,000,000). There is no filing in more than two years and the last one reported under half the target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Note · Aug 7, 2023 – Dec 2, 2025

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Delaware (1), Wyoming (1) — out of 2 member issuers. The odd ones out: Pumps & Pumps Oil Fund, Limited Partnership (Wyoming).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 2 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 1 reports proceeds to related persons totalling $400,000. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Dec 2, 2025 D
Pumps & Pumps Oil Fund, Limited Partnership
File 021-565515
$0$0$400,000 (est.)
Fund will pay Managing Partner a one-time Organization and Management Fee of 4% of committed capital at Final Closing Date as compensation for efforts organizing, providing administrative services to and managing the Fund
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 7, 2023 D
TITAN 23 LLC
File 021-488845
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 6:47 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Titan in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 6:47 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2024–2026) — 397,976 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 6:47 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2024–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 6:47 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗T2 TITAN 23 LLCshared people, same business addressSCOTTSDALE, AZCommercial1$0
offering $20,000,000 · similar: $3,000,000–$20,000,000
0
similar: 4–26
$50,000
similar: $25,000–$100,000
2023–2023
EDGAR ↗PP Pumps & Pumps Oil Fund, Limited Partnershipshared people, same business addressSCOTTSDALE, AZOil and Gas1$760,000
offering $10,000,000 · similar: $1,405,000–$19,473,684
7
similar: 1–12
$50,000
similar: $17,400–$100,000
2025–2025

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Commercial / 506(c) (2,639 filings); Oil and Gas / 506(c) (529 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Dec 2, 2025Pumps & Pumps Oil Fund, Limited PartnershipDOil and Gas$10,000,000$760,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 7, 2023TITAN 23 LLCDCommercial$20,000,000$0

Activity: 1 new offering in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Dec 2, 2025. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Commercial (2023). Latest offering: Oil and Gas (Dec 2, 2025).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
CB Catherine BellExecutive Officer2Aug 7, 2023 → Dec 2, 2025
TG Tracey GoreExecutive Officer1Dec 2, 2025 → Dec 2, 2025
NR Nika RobakExecutive Officer1Dec 2, 2025 → Dec 2, 2025
KK Katie KimExecutive Officer1Dec 2, 2025 → Dec 2, 2025
SS Sneha SethExecutive Officer1Dec 2, 2025 → Dec 2, 2025
LM Laura MillerExecutive Officer1Dec 2, 2025 → Dec 2, 2025
TM TIM MORRISONExecutive Officer1Aug 7, 2023 → Aug 7, 2023
JM JASON MUNSONExecutive Officer1Aug 7, 2023 → Aug 7, 2023

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Titan.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Titan as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Titan's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #52,500 of 374,652 in line (424 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: SCOTTSDALE), AZ). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.