PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 10:32 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

T

Taylor

One sponsor team, 4 deal companies · Irving, TX

Grouped because: 1 shared person, 1 shared management entity, same business address (4 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

4deal companies
$2.07Mreported sold
10investors
4Form D filings
2009–2009active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Oct 21, 2009 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Taylor is a sponsor group of 4 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 4 Form D filings between May 2009 and Oct 2009.

What this means One team, 4 deal companies. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $2.07M to 10 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Oil and Gas (4). Issuers are based in TX (4).

What this means $2.07M raised across the group, about $207K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Jeff Evans (4 issuers, executive officer and director) and Lampasas Energy, (4 issuers, promoter, entity).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Oct 21, 2009.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY) — 32 court cases matching the name, 8 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below. No completed search yet: property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) (runs automatically; this line updates when it finishes).

What this means 40 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 4 public filings for Taylor and found 8 differences, 4 worth asking the sponsor about: 40% of the money raised went to insiders; Taylor includes 3 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Taylor has not run yet — it is joining a line of 55,884 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 641 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: Bing (site:reddit.com / site:biggerpockets.com) and Reddit's own search, plus DuckDuckGo/Brave/BiggerPockets search when they are answering.

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

32 cases: 9 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 open, 19 dismissed, 3 judgment

Department of Transportation v. Brewer and Taylor Company closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 5:24-cv-01273 · Filed Dec 6, 2024 · Closed Dec 17, 2024
Role of Taylor Company: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2024-12-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Berger Transfer and Storage Inc v. Burns and Taylor LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:21-cv-00183 · Filed Jan 8, 2021 · Closed May 13, 2021
Role of Taylor LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2021-05-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Taylor Corporation v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP open matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:19-cv-01918 · Filed Jul 22, 2019 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
120 ETHEL ROAD WEST, LLC v. TAYLOR CORPORATION dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:15-cv-02866 · Filed Apr 22, 2015 · Closed May 13, 2016 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of TAYLOR CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2016-05-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
Baker and Taylor, Inc. v. College Book Rental Company, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 3:15-mc-00002 · Filed Mar 10, 2015 · Closed Apr 14, 2015
Role of Taylor, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2015-04-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
Taylor Corporation v. Reischling Press, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:12-cv-01083 · Filed May 2, 2012 · Closed Oct 3, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Taylor Corporation v. Bice dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:11-cv-02780 · Filed Sep 28, 2011 · Closed Oct 2, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Savage v. Centex/Taylor, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:11-cv-02134 · Filed Aug 2, 2011 · Closed Jul 11, 2012 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Role of Taylor, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2012-07-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Aprimo, Inc. v. Taylor Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:09-cv-03078 · Filed Nov 4, 2009 · Closed Feb 3, 2010 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-02-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Taylor Corporation v. MessageGate, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:08-cv-06328 · Filed Dec 10, 2008 · Closed Apr 29, 2009 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2009-04-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
MessageGate Inc v. Taylor Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:08-cv-01151 · Filed Aug 1, 2008 · Closed Dec 10, 2008 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2008-12-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Barnhart/Taylor, Inc. v. Vistacon, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, W.D. Texas · No. 5:06-cv-00708 · Filed Aug 18, 2006 · Closed Oct 18, 2006 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of Taylor, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2006-10-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (TX); filed 2006, issuer incorporated 2009
St. Clair v. Group Long Term Disability Benefits for Employees of Regency Thermographers, Inc. and Taylor Corporation, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 1:04-cv-02434 · Filed Nov 8, 2004 · Closed Apr 8, 2005 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corporation, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-04-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corporation v. Mandatory Poster Agency Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:04-cv-04127 · Filed Sep 17, 2004 · Closed May 9, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2005-05-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2009
Vandegrift v. Taylor Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 6:03-cv-00784 · Filed Jun 9, 2003 · Closed Jan 27, 2004 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2004-01-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corp v. Vincent dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:03-cv-01762 · Filed Mar 11, 2003 · Closed Apr 1, 2003 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corp: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2003-04-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corporation v. United Rentals, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, N.D. Alabama · No. 1:01-cv-01703 · Filed Jul 9, 2001 · Closed Jul 10, 2001 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-07-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AL (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corporation v. United Rentals, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, N.D. Alabama · No. 1:01-cv-01032 · Filed Apr 25, 2001 · Closed Apr 27, 2001 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-04-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AL (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor, Inc. v. Taylor judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:00-cv-03658 · Filed Dec 15, 2000 · Closed Apr 30, 2001 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Taylor, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-04-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for both plaintiff and defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MD (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corporation v. Morgan closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, N.D. Alabama · No. 1:00-cv-01907 · Filed Jul 11, 2000 · Closed Oct 24, 2000 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2000-10-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AL (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corporation v. Indigo America, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:00-cv-00242 · Filed Feb 1, 2000 · Closed Apr 6, 2000 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2000-04-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2009
LAMBERT v. TAYLOR CORPORATION closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. · Filed Sep 1, 1999 · Closed Sep 28, 1999 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of TAYLOR CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1999-09-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 1999, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor Corporation v. Hubert dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 3:99-cv-00669 · Filed Apr 26, 1999 · Closed Jul 2, 1999 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Taylor Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1999-07-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 1999, issuer incorporated 2009
Lambert v. Taylor Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:97-cv-02205 · Filed Sep 30, 1997 · Closed Sep 28, 1999 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1999-09-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 1997, issuer incorporated 2009
GEPPERT, CHERYL L. v. THE BAKER AND TAYLOR CO. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Nevada · No. · Filed Feb 11, 1994 · Closed Dec 5, 1994 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of TAYLOR CO.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1994-12-05 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NV (not the issuer's state); filed 1994, issuer incorporated 2009
Protocare of Balto. v. Taylor Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 3:92-cv-01845 · Filed Dec 21, 1992 · Closed Jul 1, 1993 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1993-07-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2009
Citizens for Better v. Taylor Corp dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:92-cv-00785 · Filed Nov 30, 1992 · Closed Feb 11, 1993 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental matters
Role of Taylor Corp: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1993-02-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2009
Ellison v. Taylor Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 1:92-cv-01056 · Filed Aug 3, 1992 · Closed Jul 1, 1993 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1993-07-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2009
Protocare of Balto. v. Taylor Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:92-cv-02047 · Filed Jul 23, 1992 · Closed Dec 17, 1992 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1992-12-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MD (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2009
Lifschultz Fast Frei v. Taylor Company dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 3:91-cv-20358 · Filed Dec 9, 1991 · Closed Jul 28, 1992 · Nature of suit: 450 Interstate commerce
Role of Taylor Company: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1992-07-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 1991, issuer incorporated 2009
TAYLOR INC v. PUROFIED DOWN PRODUCTS dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. · Filed Feb 3, 1988 · Closed Mar 10, 1989 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of TAYLOR INC: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1989-03-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, issuer incorporated 2009
LOVEJOY REFRIGERATION v. TAYLOR CO dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
District Court, W.D. New York · No. · Filed Jun 25, 1987 · Closed Aug 10, 1988 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of TAYLOR CO: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1988-08-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: lack of jurisdiction Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); filed 1987, issuer incorporated 2009
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: 48 regulators (FINRA, NASAA, 37 states) — crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Taylor..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (64,910 actions): FINRA (38,350 actions, 1995–2026), NASAA (31 actions, 2000–2026; listing starts 1997), AK Division of Banking and Securities (273 actions, 1971–2025), AL Securities Commission (880 actions, 2001–2026), AR Securities Department (1,305 actions, 1998–2026), AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), CO Division of Securities (731 actions, 2001–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-05-02)), CT Department of Banking Securities Division (940 actions, 2006–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-04-22)), DC DISB Securities Bureau (25 actions, 2012–2026), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), FL Office of Financial Regulation (49 actions, 2018–2026), GA Secretary of State Securities Division (65 actions, 2015–2026; listing starts 2012), HI DCCA Securities Enforcement Branch (26 actions, 2012–2026), ID Department of Finance Securities Bureau (663 actions, 1994–2026), IL Secretary of State Securities Department (4,122 actions, 2003–2023), KS Insurance Department Securities Division (58 actions), KY Department of Financial Institutions (342 actions, 2005–2026), LA Office of Financial Institutions Securities Division (13 actions, 2010–2025; listing starts 2008), MA Secretary of the Commonwealth Securities Division (125 actions, 2012–2025; live site blocks automated access — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-02-04), MD Attorney General Securities Division (1,054 actions, 2004–2026), ME Office of Securities (539 actions, 2000–2026), MI LARA Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau (201 actions), MO Secretary of State Securities Division (919 actions, 1998–2026), MS Secretary of State Securities Division (209 actions, 1995–2026), MT Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (597 actions, 2000–2026), NC Secretary of State Securities Division (265 actions, 2004–2024), ND Securities Department (711 actions, 1990–2026; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-01-06), NH Bureau of Securities Regulation (402 actions, 2002–2026), NM Regulation and Licensing Department Securities Division (90 actions, 2010–2025), NV Secretary of State Securities Division (118 actions, 2018–2026), NY Attorney General Investor Protection Bureau (44 actions, 2012–2026), OH Division of Securities (327 actions, 1993–2006), OK Department of Securities (2,531 actions, 1998–2026), OR Division of Financial Regulation (589 actions, 1988–2026), PA Department of Banking and Securities (1,448 actions, 2008–2024; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-08-09), RI DBR Securities Division (98 actions, 2005–2025), SC Attorney General Securities Division (540 actions, 2006–2026), SD Division of Insurance – Securities Regulation (106 actions, 2017–2026), TN Department of Commerce and Insurance Securities Division (405 actions, 1992–2026), TX State Securities Board (936 actions, 1999–2026), UT Division of Securities (772 actions, 2000–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2010-05-27)), VT DFR Securities Division (137 actions, 2010–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026), WI DFI Division of Securities (1,072 actions, 1998–2026), WV Securities Commission (State Auditor) (64 actions), WY Secretary of State Compliance Division (6 actions, 2016–2024) — last crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

8 cases: 8 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Pirinate Consulting Group LLC, as Litigation Trust v. Taylor Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 13-51473 · Filed Aug 29, 2013 · Closed Sep 20, 2013
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2013-09-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Book People Employees Association, Inc. v. Baker and Taylor Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 04-04341 · Filed Nov 9, 2004 · Closed Jul 11, 2005
Role of Taylor Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2005-07-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2009
Turoff v. Taylor Corp. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · No. 03-03171 · Filed Feb 3, 2003 · Closed Oct 8, 2003
Role of Taylor Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2003-10-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (TX); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2009
Turoff v. Taylor Corp. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · No. 02-03425 · Filed Oct 8, 2002 · Closed Feb 13, 2003
Role of Taylor Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2003-02-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (TX); filed 2002, issuer incorporated 2009
SERVICE MERCHANDISE COMPANY, INC. v. TAYLOR CORPORATION closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. 3:01-ap-00584 · Filed Mar 12, 2001 · Closed Mar 28, 2002
Role of TAYLOR CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2002-03-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TN (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2009
Gould v. Lord and Taylor, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 93-04008 · Filed Jan 11, 1993 · Closed Apr 2, 1993
Role of Taylor, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1993-04-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2009
Whitaker v. Taylor Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-09460 · Filed Jun 26, 1992 · Closed Sep 25, 1997
Role of Taylor Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1997-09-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2009
Taylor, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Taylor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · No. 88-10351 · Filed Mar 3, 1988 · Closed Aug 17, 1989
Role of Taylor, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1989-08-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IA (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, issuer incorporated 2009
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

8 differences found between the filings for Taylor — 4 worth asking about (compared 4 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Feb 1, 2010 – Mar 22, 2010

Bankruptcy case: Lampasas Energy, Inc. — filed Feb 1, 2010

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas docket "Lampasas Energy, Inc." filed Feb 1, 2010, closed Mar 22, 2010. Lampasas Energy, (listed on the same filings) is listed as Debtor ("Lampasas Energy, Inc."). Our match estimate: 80%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Worth asking · Oct 21, 2009

40% of the money raised went to insiders — Golden Empire Joint Venture

The Oct 21, 2009 Form D reports $672,000 sold and $268,100 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters.

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Sources
Worth asking · May 13, 2009 – Oct 21, 2009

Taylor includes 3 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target

Golden Empire Joint Venture (last filing Oct 21, 2009; $672,000 sold of $1,800,000); Ogletree Gap Joint Venture (last filing Aug 14, 2009; $0 sold of $1,960,000); Taylor Creek Project Joint Venture (last filing May 13, 2009; $0 sold of $2,360,000). Each has no filing in more than two years and reported under half its target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Worth asking · May 13, 2009 – Oct 21, 2009

4 paid sellers are listed without a CRD number

Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Victor Williams — Golden Empire Joint Venture · Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Victor Williams — Gutierrez Prospect Joint Venture · Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Victor Williams — Ogletree Gap Joint Venture · Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Victor Williams — Taylor Creek Project Joint Venture

What this means Without a CRD number we cannot look a seller up on BrokerCheck. Ask who they are and whether they are registered.

Sources
Worth asking · Apr 16, 2009 – Aug 14, 2009

Form D filed 120 days after the first sale — Gutierrez Prospect Joint Venture

The filing says the first sale was Apr 16, 2009. The Form D was filed Aug 14, 2009 — 120 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 105 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Sep 15, 2009 – Oct 21, 2009

Form D filed 36 days after the first sale — Golden Empire Joint Venture

The filing says the first sale was Sep 15, 2009. The Form D was filed Oct 21, 2009 — 36 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 21 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Sep 15, 2009 – Oct 21, 2009

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Golden Empire Joint Venture (latest filing Oct 21, 2009)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Oct 21, 2009 (first sale Sep 15, 2009). It reports $672,000 sold of $1,800,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · May 13, 2009 – Oct 21, 2009

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Texas (3), Tx (1) — out of 4 member issuers. The odd ones out: Taylor Creek Project Joint Venture (Tx).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

3 of 4 offerings report sales commissions totalling $927,600; 0 report finder's fees; 3 report proceeds to related persons totalling $998,400. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Oct 21, 2009 D
Golden Empire Joint Venture
File 021-135493
$273,000$0$268,100Victor Williams no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
Aug 14, 2009 D
Gutierrez Prospect Joint Venture
File 021-133644
$0$0$0Victor Williams no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
Aug 14, 2009 D
Ogletree Gap Joint Venture
File 021-133646
$297,000 (est.)$0$482,400 (est.)
This figure includes a management fee, average profit on the sale of each lease, estimated profit on the drilling of each well, and field office costs.
Victor Williams no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
May 13, 2009 D
Taylor Creek Project Joint Venture
File 021-130899
$357,600$0$247,900 (est.)
This figure includes the management fee, profit on the Drilling Agreement for each well and profit on the sale of each lease.
Victor Williams no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 4 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · searched Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Taylor in the sources searched.

Not searched: property records are matched on business-entity names only, and this group's Form D name does not carry one, so nothing was looked up and nothing can be said either way.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published); Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026); also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed. Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 8:30 AM ET; King County WA Assessor Real Property Sales extract (EXTR_RPSale.csv) Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Palm Beach 60) Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Broward 16) Oct 24, 2026, 8:24 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 24, 2026, 8:23 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 24, 2026, 8:21 AM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗TC Taylor Creek Project Joint Ventureshared people, shared management entity, same business addressIRVING, TXOil and Gas1$00$59,0002009–2009
EDGAR ↗GP Gutierrez Prospect Joint Ventureshared people, shared management entity, same business addressIRVING, TXOil and Gas1$1,400,0006$35,0002009–2009
EDGAR ↗OG Ogletree Gap Joint Ventureshared people, shared management entity, same business addressIRVING, TXOil and Gas1$00$49,0002009–2009
EDGAR ↗GE Golden Empire Joint Ventureshared people, shared management entity, same business addressIRVING, TXOil and Gas1$672,0004$45,0002009–2009

Market context: not shown for these offerings — fewer than 30 Form D filings in the last 5 years share the offering's industry and exemption, or the exemption claimed is not Rule 506(b)/506(c). No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Oct 21, 2009Golden Empire Joint VentureDOil and Gas$1,800,000$672,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 14, 2009Ogletree Gap Joint VentureDOil and Gas$1,960,000$0
EDGAR ↗Aug 14, 2009Gutierrez Prospect Joint VentureDOil and Gas$1,400,000$1,400,000
EDGAR ↗May 13, 2009Taylor Creek Project Joint VentureDOil and Gas$2,360,000$0

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Oct 21, 2009. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 4 offerings reported: Oil and Gas (2009).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
LE Lampasas Energy, entityPromoter4May 13, 2009 → Oct 21, 2009
JE Jeff EvansExecutive Officer, Director4May 13, 2009 → Oct 21, 2009

Business registration (state registry / Secretary of State)

None of the 4 issuers has a record in the registries searched.

Registries searched: AL (Alabama Secretary of State — Business Entity Records (arc-sos.state.al.us), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); CO (Colorado Secretary of State — Business Entities in Colorado (data.colorado.gov), data as of Oct 23, 2026); CT (Connecticut Secretary of the State — Business Registry (data.ct.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026); FL (Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations — quarterly corporate data file (Sunbiz), data as of Oct 7, 2026); KY (Kentucky Secretary of State — Business Entity Search (sosbes.sos.ky.gov), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); NY (New York Department of State — Corporations and Other Entities (data.ny.gov: All Filings + Active Corporations), data as of Oct 20, 2026); OR (Oregon Secretary of State — Active Businesses, All (data.oregon.gov), data as of Oct 20, 2026); PA (Pennsylvania Department of State — Registered Businesses, Current (data.pa.gov), data as of Oct 6, 2026); TX (Texas Comptroller — Active Franchise Taxpayers incl. Secretary of State file data (data.texas.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026). Registries of other states have not been searched: many publish no bulk file and require a CAPTCHA or bot challenge on their search page, which we do not bypass (Delaware, for example, offers no public bulk file). A registry listing is the state's own record of the entity; it says nothing about the offering itself.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Taylor.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Taylor as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Taylor's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #368,795 of 374,652 in line (1,386 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: IRVING), TX). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.