PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:40 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

T

Tastytrade

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Chicago, United States (as filed: X1)

Grouped because: 3 shared people, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$27Mreported sold
15investors
10Form D filings
2011–2018active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jun 29, 2018 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Tastytrade is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 10 Form D filings between May 2011 and Jun 2018.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 7 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $27M to 15 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Other Technology (1), Other Banking and Financial Services (1). Issuers are based in United States (as filed: X1) (1), IL (1).

What this means $27M raised across the group, about $1.8M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Kristine Ross (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Michelle Cullen (2 issuers, executive officer), Tom Sosnoff (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Brad Keywell (1 issuer, director), John Rosenberg (1 issuer, director) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Jun 29, 2018.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 4 court cases matching the name, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 6 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 10 public filings for Tastytrade and found 8 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: 2 separate companies in this group use the same name: "tastytrade, Inc."; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Tastytrade has not run yet — it is joining a line of 25,228 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

4 cases: 1 open, 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 judgment, 1 dismissed

Francisco v. Tastytrade, Inc. open matched at sponsor-group level (Tastytrade)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:26-cv-07028 · Filed Jun 15, 2026 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Tastytrade, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (IL)
Francisco v. Tastytrade, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Tastytrade)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:25-cv-02283 · Filed Dec 8, 2025 · Closed Jun 9, 2026 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Tastytrade, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2026-06-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Orlando Baking Company v. Pumilia's Pizza Shells and Dough Co. LLC judgment
District Court, N.D. New York · No. 6:19-cv-00288 · Filed Mar 1, 2019 · Closed Sep 3, 2019 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Dough Co. LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2019-09-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact former company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); different legal form (llc vs inc)
Moralez v. Dough LLC dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 4:17-cv-02921 · Filed May 22, 2017 · Closed Sep 15, 2017 · Nature of suit: 446 American with Disabilities - Other · Cause: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Role of Dough LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2017-09-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact former company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); different legal form (llc vs inc)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Tastytrade..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

2 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

tastytrade, Inc. v. Thrower closed matched at sponsor-group level (Tastytrade)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · No. 23-01041 · Filed Dec 22, 2023 · Closed Aug 27, 2024
Role of tastytrade, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 2024-08-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Dough Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 10-10868 · Filed Mar 12, 2010 · Closed May 6, 2010
Role of Dough Co.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2010-05-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact former company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DE (not the issuer's state); filed 2010, issuer incorporated 2014
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

8 differences found between the filings for Tastytrade — 1 worth asking about (compared 10 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · May 21, 2014 – May 28, 2014

Bankruptcy case: Keywell Metals, LLC (f/k/a KW Metals Acquisition v. SGK Ventures, LLC — filed May 21, 2014

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois docket "Keywell Metals, LLC (f/k/a KW Metals Acquisition v. SGK Ventures, LLC" filed May 21, 2014, closed May 28, 2014. Brad Keywell (listed on the same filings) is listed as Plaintiff ("Keywell Metals, LLC (f/k/a KW Metals Acquisition"). Our match estimate: 65%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Jul 2, 2013

Last filing Jul 2, 2013 with 43% of the target sold — tastytrade, Inc.

tastytrade, Inc. (last filing Jul 2, 2013; $9,000,900 sold of $21,000,000). There is no filing in more than two years and the last one reported under half the target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Note · Jul 7, 2015 – Jul 22, 2015

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — tastytrade, Inc. (latest filing Jul 22, 2015)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 22, 2015 (first sale Jul 7, 2015). It reports $0 sold of $5,808,594 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · May 9, 2011 – Dec 19, 2011

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — tastytrade, Inc. (latest filing Dec 19, 2011)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Dec 19, 2011 (first sale May 9, 2011). It reports $9,000,900 sold of $21,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Oct 2, 2014 – Jun 29, 2018

Industry group changed between filings — tastytrade, Inc.

"Other Technology" (Oct 2, 2014 to Jul 22, 2015); then "Other Banking and Financial Services" (Jun 29, 2018).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

Sources
Worth asking · May 23, 2011 – Oct 2, 2014

2 separate companies in this group use the same name: "tastytrade, Inc."

CIK 1521435 (first filed May 23, 2011, Chicago, United States (as filed: X1)); CIK 1621182 (first filed Oct 2, 2014, Chicago, IL).

What this means Two legal entities with one name can make it unclear which one you invested in. Match the CIK and the SEC file number on your documents, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 9 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jun 29, 2018 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-315761
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 22, 2015 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-244255
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 2, 2014 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-225721
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 2, 2013 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-198944
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 13, 2013 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-196387
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 26, 2012 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-188973
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Apr 4, 2012 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-176194
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Apr 4, 2012 D
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-176195
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 19, 2011 D/A
tastytrade, Inc.
File 021-160179
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:37 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Tastytrade in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:37 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2012–2026) — 802,726 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:37 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2012–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:37 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗T tastytrade, Inc.shared people, similar issuer namesCHICAGO, United States (as filed: X1)Other Technology7$9,000,9009$50,0002011–2013
EDGAR ↗T tastytrade, Inc.shared people, similar issuer namesCHICAGO, ILOther Banking and Financial Services3$25,000,001
offering $20,000,001 · similar: $2,144,500–$20,220,000
6
similar: 2–24
$883,987
similar: $10,000–$100,000
2014–2018

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other Banking and Financial Services / 506(b) (1,630 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jun 29, 2018tastytrade, Inc.DOther Banking and Financial Services$20,000,001$20,000,001
EDGAR ↗Jul 22, 2015tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$5,808,594$0
EDGAR ↗Oct 2, 2014tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$25,000,001$25,000,001
EDGAR ↗Jul 2, 2013tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$7,000,000$7,000,000
EDGAR ↗May 13, 2013tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$699,586$699,586
EDGAR ↗Dec 26, 2012tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$2,000,000$2,000,000
EDGAR ↗Apr 4, 2012tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$1,700,000$1,700,000
EDGAR ↗Apr 4, 2012tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$1,700,000$1,700,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 19, 2011tastytrade, Inc.D/AOther Technology$21,000,000$9,000,900
EDGAR ↗May 23, 2011tastytrade, Inc.DOther Technology$21,000,000$5,000,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jun 29, 2018. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other Technology (2011–2015). Latest offering: Other Banking and Financial Services (Jun 29, 2018).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
KR Kristine RossExecutive Officer, Director2May 23, 2011 → Jun 29, 2018
TS Tom SosnoffExecutive Officer, Director2May 23, 2011 → Jun 29, 2018
MC Michelle CullenExecutive Officer2May 23, 2011 → Jul 22, 2015
BK Brad KeywellDirector1Oct 2, 2014 → Jun 29, 2018
MG Matthew GelberDirector1Jun 29, 2018 → Jun 29, 2018
SS Scott SheridanDirector1Jul 22, 2015 → Jun 29, 2018
MH Matt HellmuthExecutive Officer1Jun 29, 2018 → Jun 29, 2018
JR John RosenbergDirector1Oct 2, 2014 → Jul 22, 2015

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Tastytrade.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Tastytrade as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Tastytrade's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #251,447 of 374,652 in line (1,282 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: CHICAGO), X1). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.