PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 10:32 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

P

Pike

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · New York, NY

Grouped because: 1 shared person, similar issuer names (3) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$100.5Mreported sold
51investors
6Form D filings
2009–2010active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 22, 2010 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Pike is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 6 Form D filings between Mar 2009 and Mar 2010.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 1 year of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $100.5M to 51 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (3). Issuers are based in NY (2), Cayman Islands (as filed: E9) (1).

What this means $100.5M raised across the group, about $1.97M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Daniel W. Pike (3 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter), Allison B. Nolan (1 issuer, director) and Jonathan Nicholson (1 issuer, director).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 22, 2010.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 16 court cases matching the name, 4 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 20 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 6 public filings for Pike and found 16 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: 5 court cases name Pike; Form D filed 993 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Pike has not run yet — it is joining a line of 55,924 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 641 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: Bing (site:reddit.com / site:biggerpockets.com) and Reddit's own search, plus DuckDuckGo/Brave/BiggerPockets search when they are answering.

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

16 cases: 1 open, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 10 dismissed, 1 judgment

The Pike Company, Inc. v. Tri-Krete Limited open matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, W.D. New York · No. 6:18-cv-06311 · Filed Apr 20, 2018 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of The Pike Company, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY)
The Pike Company, Inc. v. Universal Concrete Products, Corp. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, W.D. New York · No. 6:17-cv-06365 · Filed Jun 9, 2017 · Closed Jul 27, 2022 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of The Pike Company, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2022-07-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY)
UNIVERSAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. THE PIKE COMPANY, INC. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:17-cv-02589 · Filed Jun 8, 2017 · Closed Jan 10, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of THE PIKE COMPANY, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2018-01-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
The Pike Company, Inc. v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 3:13-cv-00206 · Filed Jan 28, 2013 · Closed Feb 26, 2013 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of The Pike Company, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2013-02-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Pike Co Inc judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:11-cv-01449 · Filed Sep 19, 2011 · Closed Jun 1, 2015 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Pike Co Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2015-06-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on court trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
United States for the use and Benefit of Ortega Group L.L.C. v. Pike Company, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:10-cv-02719 · Filed Jun 15, 2010 · Closed May 25, 2011 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of Pike Company, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2011-05-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY)
Hartley v. Pike Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 6:09-cv-00699 · Filed Apr 23, 2009 · Closed Jun 16, 2009 · Nature of suit: 480 Consumer credit
Role of Pike Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2009-06-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Factory Mutual Ins Co v. Pike Co Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:08-cv-01775 · Filed Nov 21, 2008 · Closed Aug 19, 2011 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Role of Pike Co Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2011-08-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
Pike Co Inc v. South Central Regional Water Authority dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:08-cv-01751 · Filed Nov 19, 2008 · Closed Aug 19, 2011 · Nature of suit: Personal Property: Other · Cause: No cause code entered
Role of Pike Co Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2011-08-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
XL Specialty Insurance Company v. The Pike Company, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, N.D. New York · No. 1:08-cv-01088 · Filed Oct 10, 2008 · Closed Dec 1, 2008 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of The Pike Company, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2008-12-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY)
BUH Construction v. The Pike Company Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 4:06-mc-00027 · Filed Oct 4, 2006 · Closed Oct 4, 2006
Role of The Pike Company Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2006-10-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
BUH Construction v. Pike Company, The closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · No. 5:06-mc-00023 · Filed Sep 22, 2006 · Closed Sep 22, 2006
Role of Pike Company, The: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2006-09-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
BUH CONSTRUCTION v. THE PIKE COMPANY, INC. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:05-cv-01546 · Filed Nov 7, 2005 · Closed Mar 7, 2007 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of THE PIKE COMPANY, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2007-03-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
National Labor v. The Pike Company closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, W.D. New York · No. 6:03-mc-06008 · Filed Jul 14, 2003 · Closed Feb 23, 2007
Role of The Pike Company: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2007-02-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY)
Professional Elec v. Pike Co Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:03-cv-00081 · Filed Jan 13, 2003 · Closed Oct 22, 2003 · Nature of suit: 220 Foreclosure
Role of Pike Co Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2003-10-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: want of prosecution Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
AGRISTOR LEASING v. PIKE CO INC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
District Court, D. Vermont · No. · Filed Jan 11, 1988 · Closed Sep 16, 1991 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of PIKE CO INC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1991-09-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VT (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, issuer incorporated 2005
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: 48 regulators (FINRA, NASAA, 37 states) — crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Pike..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (64,910 actions): FINRA (38,350 actions, 1995–2026), NASAA (31 actions, 2000–2026; listing starts 1997), AK Division of Banking and Securities (273 actions, 1971–2025), AL Securities Commission (880 actions, 2001–2026), AR Securities Department (1,305 actions, 1998–2026), AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), CO Division of Securities (731 actions, 2001–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-05-02)), CT Department of Banking Securities Division (940 actions, 2006–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-04-22)), DC DISB Securities Bureau (25 actions, 2012–2026), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), FL Office of Financial Regulation (49 actions, 2018–2026), GA Secretary of State Securities Division (65 actions, 2015–2026; listing starts 2012), HI DCCA Securities Enforcement Branch (26 actions, 2012–2026), ID Department of Finance Securities Bureau (663 actions, 1994–2026), IL Secretary of State Securities Department (4,122 actions, 2003–2023), KS Insurance Department Securities Division (58 actions), KY Department of Financial Institutions (342 actions, 2005–2026), LA Office of Financial Institutions Securities Division (13 actions, 2010–2025; listing starts 2008), MA Secretary of the Commonwealth Securities Division (125 actions, 2012–2025; live site blocks automated access — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-02-04), MD Attorney General Securities Division (1,054 actions, 2004–2026), ME Office of Securities (539 actions, 2000–2026), MI LARA Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau (201 actions), MO Secretary of State Securities Division (919 actions, 1998–2026), MS Secretary of State Securities Division (209 actions, 1995–2026), MT Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (597 actions, 2000–2026), NC Secretary of State Securities Division (265 actions, 2004–2024), ND Securities Department (711 actions, 1990–2026; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-01-06), NH Bureau of Securities Regulation (402 actions, 2002–2026), NM Regulation and Licensing Department Securities Division (90 actions, 2010–2025), NV Secretary of State Securities Division (118 actions, 2018–2026), NY Attorney General Investor Protection Bureau (44 actions, 2012–2026), OH Division of Securities (327 actions, 1993–2006), OK Department of Securities (2,531 actions, 1998–2026), OR Division of Financial Regulation (589 actions, 1988–2026), PA Department of Banking and Securities (1,448 actions, 2008–2024; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-08-09), RI DBR Securities Division (98 actions, 2005–2025), SC Attorney General Securities Division (540 actions, 2006–2026), SD Division of Insurance – Securities Regulation (106 actions, 2017–2026), TN Department of Commerce and Insurance Securities Division (405 actions, 1992–2026), TX State Securities Board (936 actions, 1999–2026), UT Division of Securities (772 actions, 2000–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2010-05-27)), VT DFR Securities Division (137 actions, 2010–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026), WI DFI Division of Securities (1,072 actions, 1998–2026), WV Securities Commission (State Auditor) (64 actions), WY Secretary of State Compliance Division (6 actions, 2016–2024) — last crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

4 cases: 1 open, 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

SoNev Construction LLC v. The Pike Company, Inc. open matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · No. 22-02035 · Filed Apr 21, 2022
Role of The Pike Company, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in UT (not the issuer's state)
The Kodak GUC Trust, by and through Alan D. Halper v. The Pike Company, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 14-01141 · Filed Jan 14, 2014 · Closed Jul 15, 2014
Role of The Pike Company, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2014-07-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY)
Ring v. Pike Company, Inc. (The) closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · No. 1-97-01267 · Filed Sep 5, 1997 · Closed Feb 23, 1998
Role of Pike Company, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1998-02-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY); filed 1997, issuer incorporated 2005
Daly & Zilch Mason Contractrs, Inc. v. Pike Company, Inc. (The) closed matched at sponsor-group level (Pike)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · No. 1-95-01010 · Filed Jan 19, 1995 · Closed Apr 23, 1996
Role of Pike Company, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1996-04-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY); filed 1995, issuer incorporated 2005
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

16 differences found between the filings for Pike — 2 worth asking about (compared 6 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Jan 14, 2014 – Jul 15, 2014

Bankruptcy case: The Kodak GUC Trust, by and through Alan D. Halper v. The Pike Company, Inc. — filed Jan 14, 2014

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York docket "The Kodak GUC Trust, by and through Alan D. Halper v. The Pike Company, Inc." filed Jan 14, 2014, closed Jul 15, 2014. Pike is listed as Defendant ("The Pike Company, Inc."). Our match estimate: 60%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Docket · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York ↗Pike — sponsor group page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jul 14, 2003 – Apr 20, 2018

5 court cases name Pike — 3 as defendant

By role: plaintiff in 2, defendant in 3. Newest: "The Pike Company, Inc. v. Tri-Krete Limited" (District Court, W.D. New York, Apr 20, 2018); "The Pike Company, Inc. v. Universal Concrete Products, Corp." (District Court, W.D. New York, Jun 9, 2017); "United States for the use and Benefit of Ortega Group L.L.C. v. Pike Company, Inc." (District Court, E.D. New York, Jun 15, 2010). Some of these are name matches with a match estimate below 95% — check each docket.

What this means Several court cases name this subject. Some are routine business suits. Ask what each was about and how it ended.

Docket · The Pike Company, Inc. v. Tri-Krete Limited ↗Docket · The Pike Company, Inc. v. Universal Concrete Products, Corp. ↗Docket · United States for the use and Benefit of Ortega Group L.L.C. v. Pike Company, Inc. ↗Docket · XL Specialty Insurance Company v. The Pike Company, Inc. ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 19, 2010

13% of the money raised went to insiders — Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP

The Mar 19, 2010 Form D/A reports $19,564,899 sold and $2,620,122 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters. Issuer's note: "This reflects fixed management fees payable to date. The management fees are equal to 1% of the assets under management per year.".

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2009

11% of the money raised went to insiders — Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP

The Mar 18, 2009 Form D/A reports $19,364,899 sold and $2,165,289 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters. Issuer's note: "This reflects fixed management fees payable to date. The management fees are equal to 1% of the assets under management per year.".

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Form D/A · Mar 18, 2009 ↗Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jul 1, 2006 – Mar 20, 2009

Form D filed 993 days after the first sale — PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD.

The filing says the first sale was Jul 1, 2006. The Form D was filed Mar 20, 2009 — 993 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 978 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Mar 20, 2009 ↗PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 1, 2006 – Mar 22, 2010

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. (latest filing Mar 22, 2010)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 22, 2010 (first sale Jul 1, 2006). It reports $16,750,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Mar 22, 2010 ↗PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jan 3, 2006 – Mar 19, 2010

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP (latest filing Mar 19, 2010)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 19, 2010 (first sale Jan 3, 2006). It reports $19,564,899 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Sep 3, 2002 – Mar 19, 2010

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Pike Capital Partners, LP (latest filing Mar 19, 2010)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 19, 2010 (first sale Sep 3, 2002). It reports $64,188,767 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Pike Capital Partners, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2009 – Mar 19, 2010

Daniel W. Pike's role changed at Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP: promoter → executive officer, promoter

The Mar 18, 2009 filing lists Daniel W. Pike as promoter; the Mar 19, 2010 Form D/A lists executive officer, promoter.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Form D/A · Mar 18, 2009 ↗Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Daniel W. Pike — PartnerFacts page ↗Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2009 – Mar 19, 2010

Daniel W. Pike's role changed at Pike Capital Partners, LP: executive officer → executive officer, promoter

The Mar 18, 2009 filing lists Daniel W. Pike as executive officer; the Mar 19, 2010 Form D/A lists executive officer, promoter.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Form D/A · Mar 18, 2009 ↗Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Daniel W. Pike — PartnerFacts page ↗Pike Capital Partners, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 22, 2010

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD.

The latest filing lists One Capital Place, 4th Floor, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9). That address is used by 4 issuers in our index (2 of 4 issuers filed c/o a registered agent / fund administrator).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D/A · Mar 22, 2010 ↗PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 19, 2010

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP

The latest filing lists 340 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY. That address is used by 13 issuers in our index (13 issuers in 7 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 19, 2010

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Pike Capital Partners, LP

The latest filing lists 340 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY. That address is used by 13 issuers in our index (13 issuers in 7 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D/A · Mar 19, 2010 ↗Pike Capital Partners, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 19, 2010 – Mar 22, 2010

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Delaware (2), Cayman Islands (1) — out of 3 member issuers. The odd ones out: PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. (Cayman Islands).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Pike — sponsor group page ↗PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 19, 2010 – Mar 22, 2010

Member companies list addresses in 2 different states

NY (2), Cayman Islands (as filed: E9) (1). 3 members use a registered-agent or shared-office address: Pike Capital Partners, LP (340 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY); Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP (340 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY); PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. (One Capital Place, 4th Floor, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)).

What this means A registered agent's address is a mailbox, not where the team works. The other address is more likely the real office — ask which one is.

Pike — sponsor group page ↗Pike Capital Partners, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP — PartnerFacts page ↗PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2009 – Mar 19, 2010

Issuer used a different name before — Pike Capital Partners, LP

SEC records list prior names for this filer: PIKE CAPITAL PARTNERS L P. The current name on file is "Pike Capital Partners, LP".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗Pike Capital Partners, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 3 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 3 report proceeds to related persons totalling $4,074,332.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 22, 2010 D/A
PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD.
File 021-128239
$0$0$401,421
This reflects fixed management fees payable to date and fees paid to directors. The Investment Manager receives 1% of assets under management per year.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 19, 2010 D/A
Pike Capital Partners, LP
File 021-52914
$0$0$1,052,789
This reflects fixed management fees payable to date. Management fees are equal to 1% of assets under management per year.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 19, 2010 D/A
Pike Capital Partners (QP), LP
File 021-90776
$0$0$2,620,122
This reflects fixed management fees payable to date. The management fees are equal to 1% of the assets under management per year.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 10:16 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Pike in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 10:16 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026) — 1,032,426 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027) — 285,535 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 514,336 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published) — 538,619 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026) — 1,263,035 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published); Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026); also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed. Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 8:30 AM ET; King County WA Assessor Real Property Sales extract (EXTR_RPSale.csv) Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Palm Beach 60) Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Broward 16) Oct 24, 2026, 8:24 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 24, 2026, 8:23 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 24, 2026, 8:21 AM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗PC Pike Capital Partners, LPshared people, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund2$64,188,76726$2,0002009–2010
EDGAR ↗PC Pike Capital Partners (QP), LPshared people, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund2$19,564,89919$250,0002009–2010
EDGAR ↗PC PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD.shared people, similar issuer namesGrand Cayman, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)Pooled Investment Fund2$16,750,0006$100,0002009–2010

Market context: not shown for these offerings — fewer than 30 Form D filings in the last 5 years share the offering's industry and exemption, or the exemption claimed is not Rule 506(b)/506(c). No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 22, 2010PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$16,750,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 19, 2010Pike Capital Partners (QP), LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$19,564,899
EDGAR ↗Mar 19, 2010Pike Capital Partners, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$64,188,767
EDGAR ↗Mar 20, 2009PIKE CAPITAL OFFSHORE, LTD.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$16,750,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 18, 2009Pike Capital Partners (QP), LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$19,364,899
EDGAR ↗Mar 18, 2009Pike Capital Partners, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$64,188,767

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 22, 2010. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 3 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2009).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
DP Daniel W. PikeDirector, Executive Officer, Promoter3Mar 18, 2009 → Mar 22, 2010
AN Allison B. NolanDirector1Mar 20, 2009 → Mar 22, 2010
JN Jonathan NicholsonDirector1Mar 20, 2009 → Mar 22, 2010

Business registration (state registry / Secretary of State)

2 of 3 issuers have a matched state registry record — records by status: active 2.

Registries searched: AL (Alabama Secretary of State — Business Entity Records (arc-sos.state.al.us), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); CO (Colorado Secretary of State — Business Entities in Colorado (data.colorado.gov), data as of Oct 23, 2026); CT (Connecticut Secretary of the State — Business Registry (data.ct.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026); FL (Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations — quarterly corporate data file (Sunbiz), data as of Oct 7, 2026); KY (Kentucky Secretary of State — Business Entity Search (sosbes.sos.ky.gov), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); NY (New York Department of State — Corporations and Other Entities (data.ny.gov: All Filings + Active Corporations), data as of Oct 20, 2026); OR (Oregon Secretary of State — Active Businesses, All (data.oregon.gov), data as of Oct 20, 2026); PA (Pennsylvania Department of State — Registered Businesses, Current (data.pa.gov), data as of Oct 6, 2026); TX (Texas Comptroller — Active Franchise Taxpayers incl. Secretary of State file data (data.texas.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026). Registries of other states have not been searched: many publish no bulk file and require a CAPTCHA or bot challenge on their search page, which we do not bypass (Delaware, for example, offers no public bulk file). A registry listing is the state's own record of the entity; it says nothing about the offering itself.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Pike.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Pike as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Pike's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #362,970 of 374,652 in line (1,386 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NEW YORK), NY). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗New York WebCivil Supreme ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

New York Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗