PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 10:29 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

M

Marker

One sponsor team, 17 deal companies · Locust Valley, NY

Grouped because: 9 shared people, 3 shared management entities, same business address (16 issuers), similar issuer names (15) · 5 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

17deal companies
$480Mreported sold
219investors
19Form D filings
2012–2022active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Feb 3, 2022 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Marker is a sponsor group of 17 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names, same person name on both filings; automatic match from the filings), filing 19 Form D filings between Aug 2012 and Feb 2022.

What this means One team, 17 deal companies, about 10 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $480M to 219 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (14), Investing (3). Issuers are based in NY (16), CA (1).

What this means $480M raised across the group, about $2.19M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Richard Scanlon (17 issuers, executive officer and director), Thomas Pompidou (14 issuers, executive officer and director), Marker Financial Advisors LLC (13 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter, entity), Yuval Schachar (6 issuers, director), Marker II GP, LTD. (5 issuers, executive officer, entity) and 18 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Feb 3, 2022.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Adviser registration (Form ADV) on record: MARKER FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 2 court cases matching the name, 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 3 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 19 public filings for Marker and found 13 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Marker includes 9 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target; Form D filed 173 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Marker has not run yet — it is #39,968 of 55,022 in line; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 641 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: Bing (site:reddit.com / site:biggerpockets.com) and Reddit's own search, plus DuckDuckGo/Brave/BiggerPockets search when they are answering.

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

2 cases: 2 dismissed

Scott v. Marker LTD dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Marker)
District Court, D. Utah · No. 2:01-cv-00917 · Filed Nov 15, 2001 · Closed Aug 29, 2003 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Marker LTD: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2003-08-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in UT (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2012
Lograsso v. Marker Ltd. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Marker)
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:86-cv-74411 · Filed Oct 17, 1986 · Closed Nov 14, 1988 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Marker Ltd.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1988-11-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MI (not the issuer's state); filed 1986, issuer incorporated 2012
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: 48 regulators (FINRA, NASAA, 37 states) — crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Marker..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (64,910 actions): FINRA (38,350 actions, 1995–2026), NASAA (31 actions, 2000–2026; listing starts 1997), AK Division of Banking and Securities (273 actions, 1971–2025), AL Securities Commission (880 actions, 2001–2026), AR Securities Department (1,305 actions, 1998–2026), AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), CO Division of Securities (731 actions, 2001–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-05-02)), CT Department of Banking Securities Division (940 actions, 2006–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-04-22)), DC DISB Securities Bureau (25 actions, 2012–2026), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), FL Office of Financial Regulation (49 actions, 2018–2026), GA Secretary of State Securities Division (65 actions, 2015–2026; listing starts 2012), HI DCCA Securities Enforcement Branch (26 actions, 2012–2026), ID Department of Finance Securities Bureau (663 actions, 1994–2026), IL Secretary of State Securities Department (4,122 actions, 2003–2023), KS Insurance Department Securities Division (58 actions), KY Department of Financial Institutions (342 actions, 2005–2026), LA Office of Financial Institutions Securities Division (13 actions, 2010–2025; listing starts 2008), MA Secretary of the Commonwealth Securities Division (125 actions, 2012–2025; live site blocks automated access — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-02-04), MD Attorney General Securities Division (1,054 actions, 2004–2026), ME Office of Securities (539 actions, 2000–2026), MI LARA Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau (201 actions), MO Secretary of State Securities Division (919 actions, 1998–2026), MS Secretary of State Securities Division (209 actions, 1995–2026), MT Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (597 actions, 2000–2026), NC Secretary of State Securities Division (265 actions, 2004–2024), ND Securities Department (711 actions, 1990–2026; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-01-06), NH Bureau of Securities Regulation (402 actions, 2002–2026), NM Regulation and Licensing Department Securities Division (90 actions, 2010–2025), NV Secretary of State Securities Division (118 actions, 2018–2026), NY Attorney General Investor Protection Bureau (44 actions, 2012–2026), OH Division of Securities (327 actions, 1993–2006), OK Department of Securities (2,531 actions, 1998–2026), OR Division of Financial Regulation (589 actions, 1988–2026), PA Department of Banking and Securities (1,448 actions, 2008–2024; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-08-09), RI DBR Securities Division (98 actions, 2005–2025), SC Attorney General Securities Division (540 actions, 2006–2026), SD Division of Insurance – Securities Regulation (106 actions, 2017–2026), TN Department of Commerce and Insurance Securities Division (405 actions, 1992–2026), TX State Securities Board (936 actions, 1999–2026), UT Division of Securities (772 actions, 2000–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2010-05-27)), VT DFR Securities Division (137 actions, 2010–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026), WI DFI Division of Securities (1,072 actions, 1998–2026), WV Securities Commission (State Auditor) (64 actions), WY Secretary of State Compliance Division (6 actions, 2016–2024) — last crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

AML Liquidation, Inc. v. Marker, LTD closed matched at sponsor-group level (Marker)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 05-01149 · Filed Dec 22, 2005 · Closed Jun 14, 2006
Role of Marker, LTD: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2006-06-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA); filed 2005, issuer incorporated 2012
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

13 differences found between the filings for Marker — 2 worth asking about (compared 19 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Feb 9, 1998 – May 21, 2001

Bankruptcy case: Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Schachar — filed Feb 9, 1998

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York docket "Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Schachar" filed Feb 9, 1998, closed May 21, 2001. YUVAL SCHACHAR (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("Schachar"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Mar 26, 1998 – Oct 17, 2000

Bankruptcy case: Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Schachar — filed Mar 26, 1998

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York docket "Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Schachar" filed Mar 26, 1998, closed Oct 17, 2000. YUVAL SCHACHAR (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("Schachar"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Worth asking · Oct 2, 2013 – Oct 5, 2021

Marker includes 9 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target

Marker-Overwolf, L.P. (last filing Oct 5, 2021; $0 sold of $8,449,926); Marker - Qwilt, L.P. (last filing Mar 16, 2020; $0 sold of $5,000,000); Marker TuneIn LP (last filing May 3, 2017; $0 sold of $25,000,000); Marker II LP Tunein Series F LP (last filing Feb 24, 2016; $0 sold of $7,746,090); Marker II LP Taboola Series E LP (last filing Jan 22, 2015; $0 sold of $10,150,000); Marker II LP Eyeview Series C-1 LP (last filing Jan 22, 2015; $0 sold of $5,250,000); and 3 more. Each has no filing in more than two years and reported under half its target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 15, 2019 – Sep 4, 2019

Form D filed 173 days after the first sale — IE III-AS LP

The filing says the first sale was Mar 15, 2019. The Form D was filed Sep 4, 2019 — 173 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 158 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Jan 3, 2022 – Feb 3, 2022

Form D filed 31 days after the first sale — Marker-Claroty Series E LP

The filing says the first sale was Jan 3, 2022. The Form D was filed Feb 3, 2022 — 31 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 16 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Aug 29, 2013 – Sep 23, 2013

Form D filed 25 days after the first sale — Marker Lantern II Ltd.

The filing says the first sale was Aug 29, 2013. The Form D was filed Sep 23, 2013 — 25 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 10 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Aug 29, 2013 – Sep 4, 2019

4 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — IE III-AS LP (latest filing Sep 4, 2019) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Marker II Joyus Series D LP (latest filing Mar 30, 2015) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Marker Lantern III Ltd. (latest filing Sep 24, 2013) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Marker Lantern II Ltd. (latest filing Sep 23, 2013)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Note · Aug 7, 2012 – Apr 7, 2015

THOMAS POMPIDOU's role changed at Marker Yext I, L.P.: executive officer → executive officer, director

The Aug 7, 2012 filing lists THOMAS POMPIDOU as executive officer; the Apr 7, 2015 Form D/A lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Aug 7, 2012 – Apr 7, 2015

RICHARD SCANLON's role changed at Marker Yext I, L.P.: executive officer → executive officer, director

The Aug 7, 2012 filing lists RICHARD SCANLON as executive officer; the Apr 7, 2015 Form D/A lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Nov 14, 2017 – May 21, 2018

Offering amount changed between filings — Innovation Endeavors III LP

The Nov 14, 2017 filing says $300,000,000 offered; the May 21, 2018 Form D/A says $333,500,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Aug 7, 2012 – Apr 7, 2015

Reported revenue range changed between filings — Marker Yext I, L.P.

"Not Applicable" (Aug 7, 2012); then "Decline to Disclose" (Apr 7, 2015).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Sources
Note · Sep 23, 2013 – Feb 3, 2022

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Cayman Islands (15), Delaware (2) — out of 17 member issuers. The odd ones out: Marker Yext I, L.P. (Delaware); Marker-Overwolf, L.P. (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 17 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Feb 3, 2022 D
Marker-Claroty Series E LP
File 021-432169
$0$0$0
The Issuer is obligated to pay a management fee to the General Partner (or an affiliate thereof).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 5, 2021 D
Marker-Overwolf, L.P.
File 021-415679
$0$0$0
The Issuer is obligated to pay a management fee to the General Partner (or an affiliate thereof).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 16, 2020 D
Marker - Qwilt, L.P.
File 021-362919
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 4, 2019 D
IE III-AS LP
File 021-347979
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 21, 2018 D/A
Innovation Endeavors III LP
File 021-298691
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Nov 2, 2017 D
Marker Follow-On Fund, LP
File 021-297987
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 3, 2017 D
Marker TuneIn LP
File 021-285935
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 24, 2016 D
Marker II LP Tunein Series F LP
File 021-258069
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF)
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Apr 7, 2015 D/A
Marker Yext I, L.P.
File 021-182276
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 30, 2015 D
Marker II Joyus Series D LP
File 021-236925
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 22, 2015 D
Marker II LP Eyeview Series C-1 LP
File 021-232719
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 22, 2015 D
Marker II LP Taboola Series E LP
File 021-232723
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILILATE THEREOF).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 15, 2014 D
Marker II LP
File 021-217422
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO THE GENERAL PARTNER (OR AN AFFILIATE THEREOF)
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 10, 2014 D
Marker VK Ltd.
File 021-211619
$0$0$0
The issuer is obligated to pay a management fee to the General Partner (or an affiliate thereof).
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 2, 2013 D
Marker Lantern I-A Ltd.
File 021-203858
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO AN AFFILIATE
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 24, 2013 D
Marker Lantern III Ltd.
File 021-203430
$0$0$0
THE ISSUER IS OBLIGATED TO PAY A MANAGEMENT FEE TO AN AFFILIATE
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 23, 2013 D
Marker Lantern II Ltd.
File 021-203330
$0$0$0
The Issuer is obligated to pay a management fee to an affiliate
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 17 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 10:16 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Marker in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 10:16 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026) — 1,032,426 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027) — 285,535 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 514,336 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published) — 538,619 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026) — 1,263,035 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published); Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026); also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed. Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 8:30 AM ET; King County WA Assessor Real Property Sales extract (EXTR_RPSale.csv) Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Palm Beach 60) Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Broward 16) Oct 24, 2026, 8:24 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 24, 2026, 8:23 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 24, 2026, 8:21 AM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗MY Marker Yext I, L.P.shared people, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYPooled Investment Fund2$13,000,000
offering $13,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
22
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2012–2015
EDGAR ↗ML Marker Lantern II Ltd.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYInvesting1$41,210,10038$75,0002013–2013
EDGAR ↗ML Marker Lantern III Ltd.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYInvesting1$22,422,000
offering $25,850,000 · similar: $763,000–$10,000,000
24
similar: 4–23
$10,000
similar: $10,000–$78,388
2013–2013
EDGAR ↗ML Marker Lantern I-A Ltd.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYInvesting1$0
offering $4,200,000 · similar: $763,000–$10,000,000
0
similar: 4–23
$100,000
similar: $10,000–$78,388
2013–2013
EDGAR ↗MV Marker VK Ltd.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $9,215,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2014–2014
EDGAR ↗M Marker II LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $200,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2014–2014
EDGAR ↗ME Marker II LP Eyeview Series C-1 LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $5,250,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2015–2015
EDGAR ↗MT Marker II LP Taboola Series E LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $10,150,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2015–2015
EDGAR ↗MJ Marker II Joyus Series D LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYPooled Investment Fund1$2,600,000
offering $4,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
6
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2015–2015
EDGAR ↗MT Marker II LP Tunein Series F LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesLOCUST VALLEY, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $7,746,090 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2016–2016
EDGAR ↗MT Marker TuneIn LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $25,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2017–2017
EDGAR ↗MF Marker Follow-On Fund, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)NEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$29,943,190
offering $29,943,190 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
23
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2017–2017
EDGAR ↗IE Innovation Endeavors III LPshared people, same person name on both filings, shared management entity, same business address, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)NEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund2$333,500,000
offering $333,500,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
69
similar: 4–27
$5,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2017–2018
EDGAR ↗IA IE III-AS LPshared people, same person name on both filings, shared management entity, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PALO ALTO, CAPooled Investment Fund1$30,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
30
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2019–2019
EDGAR ↗MQ Marker - Qwilt, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)NEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $5,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
$500,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2020–2020
EDGAR ↗MO Marker-Overwolf, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)NEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $8,449,926 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
$500,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2021–2021
EDGAR ↗MC Marker-Claroty Series E LPshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$7,294,687
offering $7,294,687 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
7
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2022–2022

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); Investing / 506(b) (2,521 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Feb 3, 2022Marker-Claroty Series E LPDPooled Investment Fund$7,294,687$7,294,687
EDGAR ↗Oct 5, 2021Marker-Overwolf, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$8,449,926$0
EDGAR ↗Mar 16, 2020Marker - Qwilt, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$5,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Sep 4, 2019IE III-AS LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$30,000,000
EDGAR ↗May 21, 2018Innovation Endeavors III LPD/APooled Investment Fund$333,500,000$333,500,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 14, 2017Innovation Endeavors III LPDPooled Investment Fund$300,000,000$178,000,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 2, 2017Marker Follow-On Fund, LPDPooled Investment Fund$29,943,190$29,943,190
EDGAR ↗May 3, 2017Marker TuneIn LPDPooled Investment Fund$25,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Feb 24, 2016Marker II LP Tunein Series F LPDPooled Investment Fund$7,746,090$0
EDGAR ↗Apr 7, 2015Marker Yext I, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$13,000,000$13,000,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 30, 2015Marker II Joyus Series D LPDPooled Investment Fund$4,000,000$2,600,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 22, 2015Marker II LP Taboola Series E LPDPooled Investment Fund$10,150,000$0
EDGAR ↗Jan 22, 2015Marker II LP Eyeview Series C-1 LPDPooled Investment Fund$5,250,000$0
EDGAR ↗May 15, 2014Marker II LPDPooled Investment Fund$200,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Feb 10, 2014Marker VK Ltd.DPooled Investment Fund$9,215,000$0
EDGAR ↗Oct 2, 2013Marker Lantern I-A Ltd.DInvesting$4,200,000$0
EDGAR ↗Sep 24, 2013Marker Lantern III Ltd.DInvesting$25,850,000$22,422,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 23, 2013Marker Lantern II Ltd.DInvesting$43,220,000$41,210,100
EDGAR ↗Aug 7, 2012Marker Yext I, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$13,000,000$13,000,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Feb 3, 2022. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Pooled Investment Fund (2012), Investing (2013). Latest offering: Pooled Investment Fund (2014–2022; most recent Feb 3, 2022).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
RS RICHARD SCANLONExecutive Officer, Director17Aug 7, 2012 → Feb 3, 2022
TP THOMAS POMPIDOUExecutive Officer, Director14Aug 7, 2012 → Oct 5, 2021
MF MARKER FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC entityExecutive Officer, Director, Promoter13Sep 23, 2013 → Oct 5, 2021
YS YUVAL SCHACHARDirector6May 15, 2014 → May 3, 2017
OF Ohad FinkelsteinDirector5May 15, 2014 → Feb 24, 2016
MG MARKER II GP, LTD. entityExecutive Officer5May 15, 2014 → Feb 24, 2016
DR DANIEL ROCHKINDExecutive Officer, Director4Sep 23, 2013 → Feb 10, 2014
YS YUVAL SHACHARExecutive Officer3Nov 2, 2017 → Oct 5, 2021
CP CLAYTON PRUGHExecutive Officer3Sep 23, 2013 → Oct 2, 2013
MF MARKER FOLLOW-ON FUND GP, LTD. entityExecutive Officer2Nov 2, 2017 → Mar 16, 2020
SB Scott BradyExecutive Officer2Nov 14, 2017 → Sep 4, 2019
DB Dror BermanExecutive Officer2Nov 14, 2017 → Sep 4, 2019
MC Marker-Claroty Series E GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Feb 3, 2022 → Feb 3, 2022
MO MARKER-OVERWOLF GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Oct 5, 2021 → Oct 5, 2021
IE INNOVATION ENDEAVORS III GP LLC entityExecutive Officer1Sep 4, 2019 → Sep 4, 2019
IA IE III-AS GP LP entityExecutive Officer1Sep 4, 2019 → Sep 4, 2019
IE INNOVATION ENDEAVORS III ADVISORS LLC entityPromoter1Sep 4, 2019 → Sep 4, 2019
IE INNOVATION ENDEAVORS III GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Nov 14, 2017 → May 21, 2018
IE INNOVATION ENDEAVORS III ADVISORS LLC entityPromoter1Nov 14, 2017 → May 21, 2018
MT MARKER TUNEIN GP, LTD. entityExecutive Officer1May 3, 2017 → May 3, 2017
MY MARKER YEXT MANAGER LTD. entityExecutive Officer1Apr 7, 2015 → Apr 7, 2015
MY MARKER YEXT GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer, Director1Apr 7, 2015 → Apr 7, 2015
MV Marker VK Manager, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Feb 10, 2014 → Feb 10, 2014

Business registration (state registry / Secretary of State)

None of the 17 issuers has a record in the registries searched.

Registries searched: AL (Alabama Secretary of State — Business Entity Records (arc-sos.state.al.us), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); CO (Colorado Secretary of State — Business Entities in Colorado (data.colorado.gov), data as of Oct 23, 2026); CT (Connecticut Secretary of the State — Business Registry (data.ct.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026); FL (Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations — quarterly corporate data file (Sunbiz), data as of Oct 7, 2026); KY (Kentucky Secretary of State — Business Entity Search (sosbes.sos.ky.gov), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); NY (New York Department of State — Corporations and Other Entities (data.ny.gov: All Filings + Active Corporations), data as of Oct 20, 2026); OR (Oregon Secretary of State — Active Businesses, All (data.oregon.gov), data as of Oct 20, 2026); PA (Pennsylvania Department of State — Registered Businesses, Current (data.pa.gov), data as of Oct 6, 2026); TX (Texas Comptroller — Active Franchise Taxpayers incl. Secretary of State file data (data.texas.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026). Registries of other states have not been searched: many publish no bulk file and require a CAPTCHA or bot challenge on their search page, which we do not bypass (Delaware, for example, offers no public bulk file). A registry listing is the state's own record of the entity; it says nothing about the offering itself.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

MARKER FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC — Exempt reporting adviser · SEC registration status as reported: “ERA - Active” since Dec 2, 2013 · SEC file 802-78907 · Main office: PORT WASHINGTON, NY · IAPD record ↗ · Form ADV filing (PDF) ↗

Regulatory assets under management: Not reported — exempt reporting advisers do not complete Form ADV Item 5.

Websites listed on Form ADV (Item 1.I): WWW.MARKER-LLC.COM ↗

Item 11 disclosure questions as answered on Form ADV filed Mar 30, 2026: 0 of 24 answered “Yes”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11 asks: “Do any of the events below involve you or any of your supervised persons?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(1) asks: “A. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(2) asks: “A. (2) been charged with any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(1) asks: “B. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to a misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related business, or any fraud, false statements, or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(2) asks: “B. (2) been charged with a misdemeanor listed in Item 11.B(1)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(1) asks: “C. Has the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(2) asks: “C. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(3) asks: “C. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(4) asks: “C. (4) entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(5) asks: “C. (5) imposed a civil money penalty on you or any advisory affiliate, or ordered you or any advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(1) asks: “D. Has any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority: (1) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission, or been dishonest, unfair, or unethical?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(2) asks: “D. (2) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(3) asks: “D. (3) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(4) asks: “D. (4) in the past ten years, entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(5) asks: “D. (5) ever denied, suspended, or revoked your or any advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented you or any advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted your or any advisory affiliate's activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(1) asks: “E. Has any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(2) asks: “E. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(3) asks: “E. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been the cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(4) asks: “E. (4) disciplined you or any advisory affiliate by expelling or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from membership, barring or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from association with other members, or otherwise restricting your or the advisory affiliate's activities?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11F asks: “F. Has an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or any advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11G asks: “G. Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any regulatory proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.C., 11.D., or 11.E.?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(a) asks: “H. (1) Has any domestic or foreign court: (a) in the past ten years, enjoined you or any advisory affiliate in connection with any investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(b) asks: “H. (1)(b) ever found that you or any advisory affiliate were involved in a violation of investment-related statutes or regulations?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(c) asks: “H. (1)(c) ever dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or any advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(2) asks: “H. (2) Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H(1)?”

Answers as filed by the adviser on Form ADV Part 1A, Item 11; question text quoted from the form. Details of each “Yes” are in the Disclosure Reporting Pages of the Form ADV (PDF) ↗.

Matched on management entity listed on Form D = adviser name, same state (NY) · Form ADV data: SEC Investment Adviser Information Report (exempt reporting advisers), file dated 2026-10-02, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:39 PM ET · IAPD record last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:36 PM ET

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Marker as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Marker's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #253,670 of 374,652 in line (1,386 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: LOCUST VALLEY), NY). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.