PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:48 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

L

Lumen

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Maple Grove, MN

Grouped because: 2 shared people, same business address (2 issuers) · 2 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$1.17Mreported sold
62investors
22Form D filings
2009–2025active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 13, 2025 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Lumen is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 22 Form D filings between Jun 2009 and Mar 2025.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 16 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.17M to 62 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Other Health Care (1), Manufacturing (1). Issuers are based in MN (2).

What this means $1.17M raised across the group, about $19K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Steven Healy (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Todd Berg (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Andrew ElBardissi (1 issuer, director), Casey Tansey (1 issuer, director), David Gregorka (1 issuer, director) and 22 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 13, 2025.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 2 court cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 2 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 22 public filings for Lumen and found 16 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Michael Fulton is no longer listed on the Apr 29, 2019 amendment; Steven P VanNurden is no longer listed on the Jul 23, 2009 amendment; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Lumen has not run yet — it is joining a line of 27,758 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

2 cases: 1 open, 1 dismissed

Tretiakov v. Lux and Lumen Corporation open matched at sponsor-group level (Lumen)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:26-cv-02692 · Filed May 20, 2026
Role of Lumen Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (MN)
Lumen Biomedical, Inc. v. Romano dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:05-cv-02714 · Filed Nov 23, 2005 · Closed Dec 22, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Lumen Biomedical, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2005-12-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (MN)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Lumen..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

None found in sources searched — federal bankruptcy courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

16 differences found between the filings for Lumen — 2 worth asking about (compared 22 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Mar 28, 1997 – Aug 19, 1997

Bankruptcy case: AFBA Industrial Bank v. Neustaedter — filed Mar 28, 1997

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California docket "AFBA Industrial Bank v. Neustaedter" filed Mar 28, 1997, closed Aug 19, 1997. David Neustaedter (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("Neustaedter"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Jul 24, 1992 – Dec 22, 1992

Bankruptcy case: FCC NATIONAL BANK v. BAUMGARDT — filed Jul 24, 1992

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota docket "FCC NATIONAL BANK v. BAUMGARDT" filed Jul 24, 1992, closed Dec 22, 1992. James Baumgardt (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("BAUMGARDT"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Oct 13, 2009

Last filing Oct 13, 2009 with 17% of the target sold — Lumen Biomedical Inc

Lumen Biomedical Inc (last filing Oct 13, 2009; $675,000 sold of $4,000,000). There is no filing in more than two years and the last one reported under half the target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Note · Feb 2, 2015 – Feb 19, 2015

Form D filed 17 days after the first sale — NEOCHORD INC

The filing says the first sale was Feb 2, 2015. The Form D was filed Feb 19, 2015 — 17 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Jun 16, 2009 – Mar 13, 2025

17 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NEOCHORD INC (latest filing Mar 13, 2025) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NEOCHORD INC (latest filing Aug 29, 2024) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NEOCHORD INC (latest filing Jul 5, 2023) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NEOCHORD INC (latest filing Nov 14, 2022) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — NEOCHORD INC (latest filing Mar 8, 2022) · and 12 more

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Worth asking · Nov 13, 2018 – Apr 29, 2019

Michael Fulton is no longer listed on the Apr 29, 2019 amendment — NEOCHORD INC

Michael Fulton appears on the Nov 13, 2018 Form D (director) but not on the Apr 29, 2019 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Worth asking · Jun 22, 2009 – Jul 23, 2009

Steven P VanNurden is no longer listed on the Jul 23, 2009 amendment — NEOCHORD INC

Steven P VanNurden appears on the Jun 22, 2009 Form D (director) but not on the Jul 23, 2009 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Dec 20, 2012 – Mar 15, 2013

John Seaberg's role changed at NEOCHORD INC: executive officer, director, promoter → executive officer, director

The Dec 20, 2012 filing lists John Seaberg as executive officer, director, promoter; the Mar 15, 2013 Form D lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Jun 22, 2009 – Feb 9, 2021

4 offerings changed their target amount between filings

Offering amount changed between filings — NEOCHORD INC · Offering amount lowered between filings — NEOCHORD INC · Offering amount changed between filings — NEOCHORD INC · Offering amount changed between filings — NEOCHORD INC

What this means Targets change as deals grow or shrink. Ask whether later money has the same terms.

Sources
Note · Oct 13, 2009 – Aug 29, 2024

Todd Berg is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Todd A. Berg" on the Oct 13, 2009 filing, and "Todd Berg" on 2 filings (from Aug 29, 2024).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Jun 22, 2009 – Dec 20, 2012

Industry group changed between filings — NEOCHORD INC

"Biotechnology" (Jun 22, 2009 to Jul 29, 2011); then "Manufacturing" (Dec 20, 2012 to Mar 13, 2025).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

Sources
Note · Jul 5, 2023 – Aug 29, 2024

Address moved from St. Louis Park, MN to Maple Grove, MN — NEOCHORD INC

The people listed on the Jul 5, 2023 filing give St. Louis Park, MN; on the Aug 29, 2024 filing they give Maple Grove, MN.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · May 22, 2015 – Sep 12, 2017

Address moved from Eden Prairie, MN to St. Louis Park, MN — NEOCHORD INC

The people listed on the May 22, 2015 filing give Eden Prairie, MN; on the Sep 12, 2017 filing they give St. Louis Park, MN.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Jul 29, 2011 – Dec 20, 2012

Address moved from Minnetonka, MN to Eden Prairie, MN — NEOCHORD INC

The people listed on the Jul 29, 2011 filing give Minnetonka, MN; on the Dec 20, 2012 filing they give Eden Prairie, MN.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Oct 13, 2009 – Mar 13, 2025

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Minnesota (1), Delaware (1) — out of 2 member issuers. The odd ones out: NEOCHORD INC (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

4 of 17 offerings report sales commissions totalling $523,000; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 13, 2025 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-540864
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 29, 2024 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-522753
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 5, 2023 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-485876
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Nov 14, 2022 D/A
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-459618
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 8, 2022 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-436279
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 20, 2021 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-413936
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 10, 2021 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-398740
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 9, 2021 D/A
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-325703
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 12, 2017 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-294509
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 22, 2015 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-240448
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 19, 2015 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-234325
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 15, 2013 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-193400
$100,000 (est.)$0$0Cedar Point Capital, LLC BrokerCheck CRD 145116 ↗EDGAR ↗
Dec 20, 2012 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-188712
$100,000 (est.)$0$0Cedar Point Capital, LLC BrokerCheck CRD 145116 ↗EDGAR ↗
Jul 29, 2011 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-163691
$200,000 (est.)$0$0Cedar Point Capital, LLC BrokerCheck CRD 145116 ↗EDGAR ↗
Jan 12, 2011 D
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-153577
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 13, 2009 D
Lumen Biomedical Inc
File 021-71768
$0$0$0
Excludes normal compensation to Executive Officers.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 23, 2009 D/A
NEOCHORD INC
File 021-103575
$123,000 (est.)$0$0Cedar Point Capital, LLC BrokerCheck CRD 145116 ↗EDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Lumen in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026) — 905,045 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗N NEOCHORD INCshared people, same business address, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)Maple Grove, MNManufacturing21$33,374,705
offering $2,150,000 · similar: $1,000,000–$7,247,539
53
similar: 2–13
No minimum reported
similar: $10,000–$60,000
2009–2025
EDGAR ↗LB Lumen Biomedical Incshared people, same business address, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)MAPLE GROVE, MNOther Health Care1$675,0009$25,0002009–2009

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Manufacturing / 506(b) (1,339 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 13, 2025NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$2,150,000$493,240
EDGAR ↗Aug 29, 2024NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$2,944,100$914,291
EDGAR ↗Jul 5, 2023NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$6,751,800$4,612,366
EDGAR ↗Nov 14, 2022NEOCHORD INCD/AManufacturing$5,958,632$2,918,965
EDGAR ↗Sep 22, 2022NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$5,958,632$2,000,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2022NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$3,545,039$1,750,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 20, 2021NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$4,000,000$1,000,000
EDGAR ↗May 10, 2021NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$3,850,000$2,800,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 9, 2021NEOCHORD INCD/AManufacturing$33,483,075$33,374,705
EDGAR ↗Aug 5, 2020NEOCHORD INCD/AManufacturing$29,247,116$29,247,116
EDGAR ↗Apr 29, 2019NEOCHORD INCD/AManufacturing$32,092,081$24,378,636
EDGAR ↗Nov 13, 2018NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$29,380,598$20,610,904
EDGAR ↗Sep 12, 2017NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$10,081,660$4,032,664
EDGAR ↗May 22, 2015NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$20,000,000$12,559,227
EDGAR ↗Feb 19, 2015NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$1,500,000$456,681
EDGAR ↗Mar 15, 2013NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$5,000,000$3,000,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 20, 2012NEOCHORD INCDManufacturing$7,000,000$852,015
EDGAR ↗Jul 29, 2011NEOCHORD INCDBiotechnology$11,000,000$5,074,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 12, 2011NEOCHORD INCDBiotechnology$1,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Oct 13, 2009Lumen Biomedical IncDOther Health Care$4,000,000$675,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 23, 2009NEOCHORD INCD/ABiotechnology$5,443,000$3,359,055
EDGAR ↗Jun 22, 2009NEOCHORD INCDBiotechnology$4,500,000$2,793,836

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 13, 2025. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Biotechnology (2009), Other Health Care (2009), Biotechnology (2011). Latest offering: Manufacturing (2012–2025; most recent Mar 13, 2025).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
TB Todd BergExecutive Officer, Director2Oct 13, 2009 → Mar 13, 2025
SH Steven HealyDirector, Executive Officer2Jun 22, 2009 → Oct 13, 2009
CT Casey TanseyDirector1Nov 13, 2018 → Mar 13, 2025
MJ Mudit K. JainDirector1Apr 29, 2019 → Mar 13, 2025
DN David NeustaedterDirector1Jul 5, 2023 → Jul 5, 2023
DC David H. ChungExecutive Officer, Director1Feb 19, 2015 → Jul 5, 2023
RN Ron NelsonExecutive Officer1Sep 12, 2017 → Jul 5, 2023
JM J. Alex MartinDirector1Sep 12, 2017 → Jul 5, 2023
DG David GregorkaDirector1Sep 22, 2022 → Jul 5, 2023
AE Andrew ElBardissiDirector1Sep 12, 2017 → Nov 14, 2022
ML Michael LiangDirector1May 10, 2021 → Mar 8, 2022
NW Nicole J. WalkerDirector1Sep 12, 2017 → Feb 9, 2021
MF Michael FultonDirector1Feb 19, 2015 → Nov 13, 2018
JB James BaumgardtDirector1Jun 22, 2009 → May 22, 2015
JZ John ZentgrafExecutive Officer1Jun 22, 2009 → May 22, 2015
GM Greg MaurerDirector1Jun 22, 2009 → May 22, 2015
MD Michael DaleDirector1Feb 19, 2015 → May 22, 2015
JA Jack K AhrensDirector1Jul 23, 2009 → May 22, 2015
JH John HuesingDirector1Feb 19, 2015 → May 22, 2015
KS Kyle SalyersDirector1Jun 22, 2009 → Mar 15, 2013
JS John SeabergExecutive Officer, Director1Jun 22, 2009 → Mar 15, 2013
TM Timothy I MaudlinDirector1Jun 22, 2009 → Mar 15, 2013
NN Nancy NessExecutive Officer1Oct 13, 2009 → Oct 13, 2009
RL Randy LaBountyExecutive Officer1Oct 13, 2009 → Oct 13, 2009
TL Thomas A. LetscherExecutive Officer1Oct 13, 2009 → Oct 13, 2009
MO Matthew F. OgleExecutive Officer, Director1Oct 13, 2009 → Oct 13, 2009
SV Steven P VanNurdenDirector1Jun 22, 2009 → Jun 22, 2009

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Lumen.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Lumen as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Lumen's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #75,235 of 374,652 in line (1,344 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: MAPLE GROVE), MN). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.