PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:37 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

KT

Kulr Technology

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Campbell, CA

Grouped because: 2 shared people, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$1.13Mreported sold
49investors
5Form D filings
2016–2019active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Aug 27, 2019 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Kulr Technology is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 5 Form D filings between Mar 2016 and Aug 2019.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 3 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.13M to 49 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: "Other" (1), Other Technology (1). Issuers are based in CA (2).

What this means $1.13M raised across the group, about $23K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Michael Mo (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Timothy Knowles (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Dr. Timothy Knowles (1 issuer, executive officer and director), Michael Carpenter (1 issuer, executive officer) and Simon Westbrook (1 issuer, executive officer).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Aug 27, 2019.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 2 court cases matching the name, 12 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 14 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 5 public filings for Kulr Technology and found 12 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 94 days after the first sale; Form D filed 574 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Kulr Technology has not run yet — it is joining a line of 19,285 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 32 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

2 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Thomas Grant Hill v. Juul Labs, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:21-cv-08428 · Filed Oct 29, 2021 · Closed Jan 2, 2024
Role of Thomas Grant Hill v. Juul Labs, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-01-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Thomas Grant Hill v. Juul Labs, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:21-cv-05354 · Filed Oct 8, 2021 · Closed Oct 25, 2021
Role of Thomas Grant Hill v. Juul Labs, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2021-10-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Kulr Technology..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

12 cases: 1 open, 11 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Grant Hill open
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 26-50429 · Filed Mar 20, 2026
Role of Grant Hill: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
David Grant Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · No. 18-22516 · Filed Apr 11, 2018 · Closed Aug 14, 2018
Role of David Grant Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2018-08-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in UT (not the issuer's state)
Ronald Grant Hill and Tonya Michelle Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 2:17-bk-50626 · Filed Apr 13, 2017 · Closed Aug 31, 2017
Role of Ronald Grant Hill and Tonya Michelle Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2017-08-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
Adam Grant Hill and Mary Elizabeth Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · No. 15-50035 · Filed Jan 28, 2015 · Closed May 7, 2015
Role of Adam Grant Hill and Mary Elizabeth Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-05-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in KY (not the issuer's state)
Grant Hill and Earline Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:14-bk-13561 · Filed Jun 30, 2014 · Closed Dec 30, 2019
Role of Grant Hill and Earline Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2019-12-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Grant Hill and Earline Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:10-bk-13454 · Filed May 11, 2010 · Closed Sep 26, 2014
Role of Grant Hill and Earline Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2014-09-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Ronald Grant Hill and Tonya Michelle Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 2:02-bk-21740 · Filed May 21, 2002 · Closed Nov 8, 2002
Role of Ronald Grant Hill and Tonya Michelle Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-11-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
David Grant Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 02-81779 · Filed Apr 12, 2002 · Closed Aug 22, 2002
Role of David Grant Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-08-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Grant Hill and Earline Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:01-bk-42388 · Filed Apr 23, 2001 · Closed Jul 25, 2006
Role of Grant Hill and Earline Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-07-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Grant Hill and Earline Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:01-bk-40815 · Filed Feb 12, 2001 · Closed Jun 21, 2001
Role of Grant Hill and Earline Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-06-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Harley Harrison Hill and Kimberly Grant Hill closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:00-bk-13089 · Filed Apr 14, 2000 · Closed Jul 31, 2000
Role of Harley Harrison Hill and Kimberly Grant Hill: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2000-07-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
EDWARD GRANT HILL and DIANA LEE HILL closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · No. 96-21522 · Filed Mar 29, 1996 · Closed Oct 16, 1998
Role of EDWARD GRANT HILL and DIANA LEE HILL: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1998-10-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

12 differences found between the filings for Kulr Technology — 2 worth asking about (compared 5 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Apr 23, 2016 – Jul 26, 2016

Form D filed 94 days after the first sale — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Apr 23, 2016. The Form D was filed Jul 26, 2016 — 94 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 79 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Jul 26, 2016 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Aug 22, 2014 – Mar 18, 2016

Form D filed 574 days after the first sale — KULR Technology Corp

The filing says the first sale was Aug 22, 2014. The Form D was filed Mar 18, 2016 — 574 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 559 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Mar 18, 2016 ↗KULR Technology Corp — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 30, 2018 – Dec 17, 2018

Form D filed 17 days after the first sale — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Nov 30, 2018. The Form D was filed Dec 17, 2018 — 17 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Dec 17, 2018 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Aug 19, 2019 – Aug 27, 2019

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — KULR Technology Group, Inc. (latest filing Aug 27, 2019)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Aug 27, 2019 (first sale Aug 19, 2019). It reports $126,000 sold of $3,600,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Aug 27, 2019 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 3, 2018 – Jul 12, 2018

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — KULR Technology Group, Inc. (latest filing Jul 12, 2018)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 12, 2018 (first sale Jul 3, 2018). It reports $184,000 sold of $3,500,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Jul 12, 2018 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Apr 23, 2016 – Jul 26, 2016

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — KULR Technology Group, Inc. (latest filing Jul 26, 2016)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 26, 2016 (first sale Apr 23, 2016). It reports $380 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Jul 26, 2016 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 26, 2016 – Dec 17, 2018

Industry group changed between filings — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

"Other Technology" (Jul 26, 2016 to Jul 12, 2018); then "Other" (Dec 17, 2018 to Aug 27, 2019).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

Form D · Jul 26, 2016 ↗Form D · Dec 17, 2018 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 12, 2018 – Dec 17, 2018

Address moved from Saratoga, CA to Campbell, CA — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

The people listed on the Jul 12, 2018 filing give Saratoga, CA; on the Dec 17, 2018 filing they give Campbell, CA. The address now on file (1999 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 700, Campbell, CA) is a registered-agent or shared-office address used by 12 issuers.

What this means A registered agent's address is a mailbox, not where the team works. Ask where the business actually operates.

Form D · Jul 12, 2018 ↗Form D · Dec 17, 2018 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 26, 2016 – Jul 12, 2018

Reported revenue range changed between filings — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

"No Revenues" (Jul 26, 2016); then "Decline to Disclose" (Jul 12, 2018).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Form D · Jul 26, 2016 ↗Form D · Jul 12, 2018 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Aug 27, 2019

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

The latest filing lists 1999 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 700, Campbell, CA. That address is used by 12 issuers in our index (12 issuers in 11 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D · Aug 27, 2019 ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2016

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — KULR Technology Corp

The latest filing lists 5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 270, Santa Clara, CA. That address is used by 19 issuers in our index (19 issuers in 19 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D · Mar 18, 2016 ↗KULR Technology Corp — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 26, 2016 – Aug 27, 2019

Issuer used a different name before — KULR Technology Group, Inc.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: KT High-Tech Marketing Inc.; KT High-Tech Marketing Inc.; Grant Hill Acquisition Corp. The current name on file is "KULR Technology Group, Inc.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗KULR Technology Group, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 5 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Aug 27, 2019 D
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
File 021-347493
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 17, 2018 D
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
File 021-328126
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 12, 2018 D
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
File 021-316637
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 26, 2016 D
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
File 021-267739
$0$0$0none no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
Mar 18, 2016 D
KULR Technology Corp
File 021-259609
$0$0$0
The persons named in Item 3 may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including salary. The amount of such salaries cannot be estimated at this time.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Kulr Technology in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗KT KULR Technology Corpshared people, similar issuer namesSANTA CLARA, CAOther Technology1$1,000,0009No minimum reported2016–2016
EDGAR ↗KT KULR Technology Group, Inc.shared people, similar issuer namesCAMPBELL, CAOther4$184,000
offering $3,600,000 · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
40
similar: 2–14
$10,000
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2016–2019

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other / 506(b) (18,678 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Aug 27, 2019KULR Technology Group, Inc.DOther$3,600,000$126,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 17, 2018KULR Technology Group, Inc.DOther$31,000$31,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 12, 2018KULR Technology Group, Inc.DOther Technology$3,500,000$184,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 26, 2016KULR Technology Group, Inc.DOther TechnologyIndefinite$380
EDGAR ↗Mar 18, 2016KULR Technology CorpDOther Technology$1,000,000$1,000,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Aug 27, 2019. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other Technology (2016–2018). Latest offering: Other (2018–2019; most recent Aug 27, 2019).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
TK Timothy KnowlesExecutive Officer, Director2Mar 18, 2016 → Aug 27, 2019
MM Michael MoExecutive Officer, Director2Mar 18, 2016 → Aug 27, 2019
SW Simon WestbrookExecutive Officer1Jul 12, 2018 → Aug 27, 2019
MC Michael CarpenterExecutive Officer1Jul 12, 2018 → Aug 27, 2019
DK Dr. Timothy KnowlesExecutive Officer, Director1Jul 12, 2018 → Jul 12, 2018

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Kulr Technology.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Kulr Technology as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Kulr Technology's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #290,771 of 374,652 in line (48 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: CAMPBELL), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗California — find the county court ↗Los Angeles Superior Court case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

California Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗