PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:32 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

K

Kajj

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · New York, NY

Grouped because: 1 shared person, 1 shared management entity (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$37.2Mreported sold
185investors
7Form D filings
2017–2020active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Aug 18, 2020 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Kajj is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity; automatic match from the filings), filing 7 Form D filings between Feb 2017 and Aug 2020.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 3 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $37.2M to 185 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in NY (2).

What this means $37.2M raised across the group, about $201K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: KAJJ Management LLC (2 issuers, executive officer and promoter, entity) and Kevin Chen (2 issuers, executive officer and promoter).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Aug 18, 2020.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 61 court cases matching the name, 38 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 99 records came back, including 9 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 7 public filings for Kajj and found 8 differences: CRD number for PHX Financial, Inc. appears on one filing and not another; Form D filed 42 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Kajj has not run yet — it is joining a line of 18,353 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

61 cases: 9 open, 16 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 28 dismissed, 8 judgment

EEOC v. Advanced Technology Group, Inc. open
District Court, D. New Mexico · No. 1:26-cv-01501 · Filed May 12, 2026
Role of EEOC v. Advanced Technology Group, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NM (not the issuer's state)
Applied Medical Distribution Corporation v. Advanced Technology Company KSCP open
District Court, C.D. California · No. 8:25-cv-02663 · Filed Nov 26, 2025 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Role of Applied Medical Distribution Corporation v. Advanced Technology Company KSCP: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Christopher R Franz v. Nordex Advanced Technology, Inc. open
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:25-cv-11506 · Filed Nov 24, 2025
Role of Christopher R Franz v. Nordex Advanced Technology, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Products, Inc. v. Oriental Export Corporation open
District Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 2:25-cv-01239 · Filed Oct 23, 2025 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Role of Advanced Technology Products, Inc. v. Oriental Export Corporation: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Apex Advanced Technology, LLC v. TDS Metrocom, LLC open
District Court, D. Idaho · No. 1:25-cv-00581 · Filed Oct 15, 2025 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Apex Advanced Technology, LLC v. TDS Metrocom, LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ID (not the issuer's state)
Sims v. Advanced Technology Services open
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 1:25-cv-01192 · Filed May 15, 2025
Role of Sims v. Advanced Technology Services: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Ford v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:24-cv-06157 · Filed Aug 30, 2024 · Closed Mar 5, 2025
Role of Ford v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2025-03-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Browne v. Advanced Technology Group Construction Services Incorporated closed
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:24-cv-01481 · Filed Jun 19, 2024 · Closed Mar 13, 2025
Role of Browne v. Advanced Technology Group Construction Services Incorporated: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2025-03-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AZ (not the issuer's state)
Apex Advanced Technology, LLC v. TDS Metrocom, LLC. closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:24-cv-02672 · Filed Apr 3, 2024 · Closed Apr 16, 2024
Role of Apex Advanced Technology, LLC v. TDS Metrocom, LLC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-04-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
ATS Equity, L.L.C. v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. open
District Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 4:23-cv-00785 · Filed Jun 19, 2023 · Nature of suit: Stockholders Suits · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Role of ATS Equity, L.L.C. v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Romack Resource Solutions Ltd v. Advanced Technology Innovations LLC closed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:22-cv-01825 · Filed Aug 18, 2022 · Closed Mar 15, 2023 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other Contract · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Role of Romack Resource Solutions Ltd v. Advanced Technology Innovations LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2023-03-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
United States of America v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation open
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:22-cv-01061 · Filed Jul 29, 2022 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller Act · Cause: 40:270 Miller Act
Role of United States of America v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Apex Advanced Technology LLC v. RMSI Private Limited closed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:21-cv-01400 · Filed Dec 16, 2021 · Closed Apr 24, 2023 · Nature of suit: Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) · Cause: 18:1836(a) - Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Role of Apex Advanced Technology LLC v. RMSI Private Limited: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2023-04-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Mira Advanced Technology Systems Inc. v. Google LLC closed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:21-cv-00363 · Filed Mar 25, 2021 · Closed Mar 26, 2021
Role of Mira Advanced Technology Systems Inc. v. Google LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2021-03-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Mira Advanced Technology Systems Inc. v. Google LLC closed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:21-cv-00367 · Filed Mar 25, 2021 · Closed Mar 26, 2021
Role of Mira Advanced Technology Systems Inc. v. Google LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2021-03-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
United States v. Advanced Technology Construction dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:19-cv-01013 · Filed Jun 28, 2019 · Closed Feb 23, 2021 · Nature of suit: Miller Act · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Role of United States v. Advanced Technology Construction: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2021-02-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boscacci, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Construction closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:19-cv-00263 · Filed Jan 15, 2019 · Closed Jun 27, 2019 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boscacci, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Construction: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2019-06-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Skyline Advanced Technology Services v. Shafer closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:18-cv-06641 · Filed Oct 31, 2018 · Closed Feb 6, 2024 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Skyline Advanced Technology Services v. Shafer: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-02-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Group Inc v. Sperlonga Data & Analytics Systems LLC judgment
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:17-cv-03270 · Filed Dec 1, 2017 · Closed Jun 6, 2019 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions · Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Role of Advanced Technology Group Inc v. Sperlonga Data & Analytics Systems LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2019-06-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for unknown Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Group LLC as Trustee for Minor Children v. Green Bank NA dismissed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:17-cv-03622 · Filed Nov 29, 2017 · Closed Oct 1, 2018 · Nature of suit: 290 Real Property: Other · Cause: 42:1981 Housing Discrimination
Role of Advanced Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Group LLC as Trustee for Minor Children v. Green Bank NA: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-10-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
OPEO, Inc. v. Light Metal Advanced Technology Co., Ltd. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 5:15-cv-13673 · Filed Oct 19, 2015 · Closed Nov 14, 2016 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of OPEO, Inc. v. Light Metal Advanced Technology Co., Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2016-11-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Wayne-Dalton v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation closed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:15-cv-00886 · Filed Jun 3, 2015 · Closed Oct 23, 2015 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of Wayne-Dalton v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-10-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Picatti Brothers Inc v. Advanced Technology Construction Corp dismissed
District Court, E.D. Washington · No. 1:15-cv-03075 · Filed May 14, 2015 · Closed Sep 23, 2016 · Nature of suit: Miller Act · Cause: 28:1330 Breach of Contract
Role of Picatti Brothers Inc v. Advanced Technology Construction Corp: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2016-09-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
URS Energy & Construction, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. dismissed
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 1:14-cv-01464 · Filed Dec 5, 2014 · Closed Feb 20, 2015 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of URS Energy & Construction, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-02-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
United States of America ex rel Performance Contracting Inc v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation dismissed
District Court, E.D. Washington · No. 1:14-cv-03163 · Filed Nov 3, 2014 · Closed Jan 28, 2016 · Nature of suit: Miller Act · Cause: 40:3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Role of United States of America ex rel Performance Contracting Inc v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2016-01-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Lee Fabricators, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Construction Corp. closed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:14-cv-01127 · Filed Jul 24, 2014 · Closed Jun 30, 2015 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller Act · Cause: 40:270 Miller Act
Role of Lee Fabricators, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Construction Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-06-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Receivables Exchange, LLC v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. judgment
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:14-cv-00668 · Filed Mar 24, 2014 · Closed Nov 7, 2014 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Receivables Exchange, LLC v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-11-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
Receivables Exchange, LLC v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:14-cv-00656 · Filed Mar 21, 2014 · Closed Mar 24, 2014 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Receivables Exchange, LLC v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-03-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: lack of jurisdiction Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
PharmAseptic, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:13-cv-01925 · Filed Dec 30, 2013 · Closed Sep 4, 2014 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of PharmAseptic, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Materials, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-09-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
Diesel Head Parts and Service, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Systems Company, Inc. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 3:13-cv-00724 · Filed Dec 17, 2013 · Closed Mar 31, 2014 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Diesel Head Parts and Service, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Systems Company, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
United States of America for the use and benefit of Puget Sound Utilities, LLC v. Advanced Technology Construction Corp dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:12-cv-02049 · Filed Nov 21, 2012 · Closed Jan 7, 2014 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of United States of America for the use and benefit of Puget Sound Utilities, LLC v. Advanced Technology Construction Corp: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-01-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Services, Inc. v. Bacalu dismissed
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 1:12-cv-01476 · Filed Nov 15, 2012 · Closed Dec 28, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Technology Services, Inc. v. Bacalu: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-12-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Wedi Corp. v. Polymers Advanced Technology, LLC dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:12-cv-01940 · Filed Mar 16, 2012 · Closed Jul 12, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Wedi Corp. v. Polymers Advanced Technology, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-07-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
BP BIOFUELS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INC v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC dismissed
District Court, N.D. Florida · No. 1:12-cv-00051 · Filed Mar 5, 2012 · Closed Dec 10, 2013 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Role of BP BIOFUELS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INC v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-12-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Corporation v. Instron Corp. judgment
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:12-cv-10171 · Filed Jan 30, 2012 · Closed Dec 18, 2014 · Nature of suit: 410 Anti-Trust · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Role of Advanced Technology Corporation v. Instron Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2014-12-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Corporation, Inc v. American Society of Mechanical Engineers judgment
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 3:11-cv-00583 · Filed Dec 19, 2011 · Closed Mar 15, 2013 · Nature of suit: Assault Libel & Slander · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Role of Advanced Technology Corporation, Inc v. American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-03-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Systems Company, Inc. v. Maritime Security Strategies, LLC dismissed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:11-cv-01052 · Filed Sep 28, 2011 · Closed Nov 30, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Technology Systems Company, Inc. v. Maritime Security Strategies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-11-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation dismissed
District Court, W.D. Texas · No. 1:09-cv-00410 · Filed May 22, 2009 · Closed May 14, 2010 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2010-05-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Bradley v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. dismissed
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · No. 1:07-cv-00053 · Filed Feb 7, 2007 · Closed Aug 7, 2007 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Role of Bradley v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-08-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NC (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:07-cv-00580 · Filed Jan 29, 2007 · Closed Nov 17, 2009 · Nature of suit: Anti-Trust · Cause: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Role of Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2009-11-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:07-cv-00581 · Filed Jan 29, 2007 · Closed Sep 15, 2008 · Nature of suit: Anti-Trust · Cause: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Role of Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Innovation Corp. v. Snow Aviation International, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 2:06-cv-00731 · Filed Aug 25, 2006 · Closed Nov 6, 2006 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Advanced Technology Innovation Corp. v. Snow Aviation International, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-11-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
CAT Advanced Technology v. WYO-BEN Corporation dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:06-cv-03040 · Filed Jul 18, 2006 · Closed Dec 19, 2006 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of CAT Advanced Technology v. WYO-BEN Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-12-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Microchip Technology Incorporated v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 3:04-cv-05171 · Filed Mar 24, 2004 · Closed Apr 20, 2004 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Microchip Technology Incorporated v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2004-04-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Healing Machines Inc v. Advanced Technology dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:02-cv-02240 · Filed Nov 1, 2002 · Closed Mar 12, 2004 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Healing Machines Inc v. Advanced Technology: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2004-03-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. Hyak Laboratories dismissed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:02-cv-01134 · Filed Jul 31, 2002 · Closed Oct 7, 2002 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Technology v. Hyak Laboratories: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2002-10-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. v. Micron Technologies, Inc. judgment
District Court, N.D. California · No. 4:02-cv-03546 · Filed Jul 24, 2002 · Closed Aug 10, 2007 · Nature of suit: Anti-Trust · Cause: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Role of Advanced Technology Distributors, Inc. v. Micron Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-08-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. Avcon Industries dismissed
District Court, W.D. Texas · No. 5:98-cv-00002 · Filed Jan 2, 1998 · Closed Oct 19, 1998 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Technology v. Avcon Industries: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1998-10-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC v. HIGHWAY MACHINE INCORPORATED ! dismissed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 3:97-cv-00122 · Filed Jul 2, 1997 · Closed Jun 10, 1999 · Nature of suit: 863 D.I.W.C. / D.I.W.W.
Role of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC v. HIGHWAY MACHINE INCORPORATED !: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1999-06-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. HERLEY INDUSTRIES open
District Court, N.D. Florida · No. 3:96-mc-00019 · Filed Jun 26, 1996
Role of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. HERLEY INDUSTRIES: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. L B White Company closed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 3:91-mc-07177 · Filed Aug 14, 1991 · Closed Aug 14, 1991
Role of Advanced Technology v. L B White Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1991-08-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. L B White Co Inc closed
District Court, E.D. Texas · No. 6:91-mc-00111 · Filed Aug 12, 1991 · Closed Aug 12, 1991
Role of Advanced Technology v. L B White Co Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1991-08-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. Systems Exploration judgment
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:90-cv-00675 · Filed May 23, 1990 · Closed Sep 12, 1990 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Technology v. Systems Exploration: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-09-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. L B White Co Inc judgment
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 3:90-cv-00212 · Filed Apr 16, 1990 · Closed Sep 9, 1994 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of Advanced Technology v. L B White Co Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1994-09-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. Systems Exploration closed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:90-cv-00399 · Filed Mar 21, 1990 · Closed May 15, 1990
Role of Advanced Technology v. Systems Exploration: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-05-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. Michael P.W. Stone closed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:90-cv-00161 · Filed Feb 6, 1990 · Closed Mar 23, 1990
Role of Advanced Technology v. Michael P.W. Stone: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-03-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology v. Sussex Leasing Corp dismissed
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · No. 5:89-cv-00698 · Filed Jun 9, 1989 · Closed Jun 9, 1989 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Technology v. Sussex Leasing Corp: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1989-06-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WV (not the issuer's state)
J. M. Clark Co. v. Advanced Technology dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 4:88-cv-01037 · Filed Dec 2, 1988 · Closed Mar 30, 1990 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of J. M. Clark Co. v. Advanced Technology: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-03-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
PECO MFG CO v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LTD dismissed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. · Filed Jul 6, 1988 · Closed Jun 11, 1990 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of PECO MFG CO v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LTD: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-06-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in ND (not the issuer's state)
American Cyanamid Co v. Advanced Technology dismissed
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:88-cv-00177 · Filed Apr 13, 1988 · Closed Apr 18, 1990 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of American Cyanamid Co v. Advanced Technology: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1990-04-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LAB.INC v. YADAV,RANVIR S. dismissed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. · Filed Dec 10, 1987 · Closed Jun 27, 1989 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LAB.INC v. YADAV,RANVIR S.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1989-06-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Kajj..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

38 cases: 38 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Kmart Holding Corporation v. Advanced Technology Services Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 20-06102 · Filed Apr 2, 2020 · Closed Apr 5, 2021
Role of Kmart Holding Corporation v. Advanced Technology Services Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-04-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Sigmon & Henderson, PLLC v. Advanced Technology, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · No. 16-03173 · Filed Mar 28, 2016 · Closed Dec 5, 2016
Role of Sigmon & Henderson, PLLC v. Advanced Technology, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2016-12-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NC (not the issuer's state)
Executive Sounding Board Associates Inc., as Trust v. Advanced Technology & Design, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 11-01941 · Filed May 11, 2011 · Closed Dec 5, 2011
Role of Executive Sounding Board Associates Inc., as Trust v. Advanced Technology & Design, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-12-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Eugene I. Davis, as Litigation Trustee for the Que v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 10-02125 · Filed Jan 14, 2010 · Closed Aug 24, 2011
Role of Eugene I. Davis, as Litigation Trustee for the Que v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-08-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Stickel v. Advanced Technology Group USA closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 09-06644 · Filed Oct 21, 2009 · Closed Dec 11, 2009
Role of Stickel v. Advanced Technology Group USA: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2009-12-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Concepts Ltd closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 05-10925 · Filed Mar 24, 2005 · Closed Jun 28, 2005
Role of Advanced Technology Concepts Ltd: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-06-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Interconnect Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 04-33221 · Filed Nov 17, 2004 · Closed Oct 30, 2007
Role of Advanced Technology Interconnect Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-10-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Jack B. Fishman, not individually, but solely in h v. Longview Inspection-Advanced Technology Group, Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 04-54042 · Filed Jun 24, 2004 · Closed Sep 13, 2004
Role of Jack B. Fishman, not individually, but solely in h v. Longview Inspection-Advanced Technology Group, Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-09-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
NewFlorida Properties Corporation v. Advanced Technology Systems Integrators Corp closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · No. 04-01204 · Filed May 28, 2004 · Closed Oct 7, 2004
Role of NewFlorida Properties Corporation v. Advanced Technology Systems Integrators Corp: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-10-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Stephen S. Gray, Plan Administrator of Dehon, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Institute closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 04-04062 · Filed Jan 23, 2004 · Closed Mar 4, 2005
Role of Stephen S. Gray, Plan Administrator of Dehon, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Institute: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-03-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
Startec Global Communications Corp. v. Advanced Technology, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 03-01319 · Filed Dec 11, 2003 · Closed Apr 15, 2004
Role of Startec Global Communications Corp. v. Advanced Technology, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-04-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
ABC-NACO, Inc., etal v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 03-04120 · Filed Oct 10, 2003 · Closed Feb 9, 2004
Role of ABC-NACO, Inc., etal v. Advanced Technology Services, Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-02-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Advanced Technology Services Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-90343 · Filed Oct 3, 2003 · Closed Jan 26, 2004
Role of Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Advanced Technology Services Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-01-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Morrow v. Advanced Technology Solutions closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 03-03636 · Filed Sep 25, 2003 · Closed Jan 7, 2004
Role of Morrow v. Advanced Technology Solutions: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-01-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of 3 v. PSA Advanced Technology Group closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-02398 · Filed Apr 14, 2003 · Closed Apr 11, 2008
Role of The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of 3 v. PSA Advanced Technology Group: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2008-04-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
FRIEDE GOLDMAN HALTER, INC. v. LONGVIEW INSPECTION - ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, I closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · No. 03-05067 · Filed Apr 10, 2003 · Closed Jul 16, 2004
Role of FRIEDE GOLDMAN HALTER, INC. v. LONGVIEW INSPECTION - ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, I: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-07-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MS (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Video Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · No. 02-17420 · Filed Jun 17, 2002 · Closed Sep 9, 2003
Role of Advanced Technology Video Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-09-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Solutions, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 02-96135 · Filed Jun 13, 2002 · Closed Oct 6, 2003
Role of Advanced Technology Solutions, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-10-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Perkins v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 02-09251 · Filed Jun 12, 2002 · Closed Mar 5, 2003
Role of Perkins v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-03-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Giuliano v. Advanced Technology, Inc. Dba Advanced Technology closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-09563 · Filed Dec 23, 2001 · Closed Aug 12, 2004
Role of Giuliano v. Advanced Technology, Inc. Dba Advanced Technology: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-08-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
BankVest Capital Corporation v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 01-04406 · Filed Dec 4, 2001 · Closed Apr 22, 2002
Role of BankVest Capital Corporation v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-04-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
SERVICE MERCHANDISE COMPANY, INC. v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY +, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. 3:01-ap-01183 · Filed Mar 12, 2001 · Closed Jun 8, 2002
Role of SERVICE MERCHANDISE COMPANY, INC. v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY +, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-06-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-00224 · Filed Mar 8, 2001 · Closed Aug 6, 2002
Role of OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-08-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
HOME HEALTH CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-00109 · Filed Feb 16, 2001 · Closed Mar 25, 2002
Role of HOME HEALTH CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Gwynne v. SMITH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 00-01133 · Filed Sep 6, 2000 · Closed Oct 24, 2002
Role of Gwynne v. SMITH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-10-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Real World Advanced Technology, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 00-36526 · Filed Jun 27, 2000 · Closed Jul 3, 2001
Role of Real World Advanced Technology, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-07-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
ICF KAISER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY OF NEW MEXICO, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 00-02277 · Filed Jun 9, 2000 · Closed Nov 19, 2004
Role of ICF KAISER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY OF NEW MEXICO, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-11-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
KAISER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 00-02268 · Filed Jun 9, 2000 · Closed Nov 19, 2004
Role of KAISER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-11-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SALES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORAT closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · No. 99-30713 · Filed Mar 16, 1999 · Closed Feb 3, 2003
Role of ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SALES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORAT: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-02-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
William J. Scharffenberger, Ch. 11 Trustee of Alle v. Advanced Technology Management, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 99-02072 · Filed Mar 3, 1999 · Closed May 10, 2007 · Nature of suit: 456 Declaratory Judgment
Role of William J. Scharffenberger, Ch. 11 Trustee of Alle v. Advanced Technology Management, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-05-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Automation, Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 1:98-bk-05552 · Filed Nov 18, 1998 · Closed Jun 28, 2001
Role of Advanced Technology Automation, Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-06-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
World Advanced Technology, Inc. v. Wall-Car Fabricators, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 98-04421 · Filed Jun 18, 1998 · Closed Jan 25, 1999
Role of World Advanced Technology, Inc. v. Wall-Car Fabricators, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1999-01-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
F & M Distributors, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Center closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 96-04939 · Filed Nov 22, 1996 · Closed Apr 7, 1997
Role of F & M Distributors, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Center: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-04-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Incorporated closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 96-55340 · Filed Nov 14, 1996 · Closed Oct 24, 1997
Role of Advanced Technology Incorporated: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-10-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Whitaker v. Advanced Technology& Research Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-25177 · Filed Oct 15, 1992 · Closed Jul 9, 1993
Role of Whitaker v. Advanced Technology& Research Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-07-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Systems Group, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 91-30304 · Filed Jun 10, 1991 · Closed Mar 19, 1992
Role of Advanced Technology Systems Group, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-03-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology of Jonesboro, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 3:90-bk-30618 · Filed Nov 30, 1990 · Closed Jan 27, 1994
Role of Advanced Technology of Jonesboro, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1994-01-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Technology Group, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · No. 83-00186 · Filed Apr 22, 1983 · Closed Jan 29, 1987
Role of Advanced Technology Group, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1987-01-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in HI (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

8 differences found between the filings for Kajj (compared 7 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Apr 25, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017

CRD number for PHX Financial, Inc. appears on one filing and not another — Private Market Securities Fund LLC

The Jun 30, 2017 filing lists PHX Financial, Inc. with CRD 144403; the Apr 25, 2017 Form D/A lists the same name with no CRD number.

What this means A CRD number is how you look a seller up on FINRA BrokerCheck. Missing it on a later form is usually a paperwork slip — use the number from the earlier form to check them.

Sources
Note · Jan 8, 2020 – Feb 19, 2020

Form D filed 42 days after the first sale — Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLC

The filing says the first sale was Jan 8, 2020. The Form D was filed Feb 19, 2020 — 42 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 27 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Feb 8, 2017 – Feb 28, 2017

Form D filed 20 days after the first sale — Private Market Securities Fund LLC

The filing says the first sale was Feb 8, 2017. The Form D was filed Feb 28, 2017 — 20 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 5 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Feb 20, 2020 – Aug 18, 2020

Kevin Chen's role changed at Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLC: executive officer, promoter → executive officer

The Feb 20, 2020 filing lists Kevin Chen as executive officer, promoter; the Aug 18, 2020 Form D/A lists executive officer.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Jan 8, 2020 – Aug 18, 2020

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLC (latest filing Aug 18, 2020)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Aug 18, 2020 (first sale Jan 8, 2020). It reports $12,495,103 sold of $50,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Feb 8, 2017 – Jul 20, 2018

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Private Market Securities Fund LLC (latest filing Jul 20, 2018)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 20, 2018 (first sale Feb 8, 2017). It reports $24,729,946 sold of $50,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Feb 28, 2017 – Jul 20, 2018

Reported net asset value range changed between filings — Private Market Securities Fund LLC

"Not Applicable" (Feb 28, 2017); then "Decline to Disclose" (Jul 20, 2018).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Sources
Note · Jul 20, 2018 – Aug 18, 2020

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

New York (1), Delaware (1) — out of 2 member issuers. The odd ones out: Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLC (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

2 of 2 offerings report sales commissions totalling $3,722,505; 0 report finder's fees; 2 report proceeds to related persons totalling $745,021.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Aug 18, 2020 D/A
Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLC
File 021-360934
$1,249,510$0$250,422
Represents a management fee paid to KAJJ Management LLC, its manager
PHX Financial, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 144403 ↗EDGAR ↗
Jul 20, 2018 D/A
Private Market Securities Fund LLC
File 021-281498
$2,472,995$0$494,599
Represents a management fee paid to KAJJ Management LLC, its manager.
PHX Financial, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 144403 ↗EDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Kajj in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗PM Private Market Securities Fund LLCshared people, shared management entityNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund4$24,729,946
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
97
similar: 4–27
$100,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2017–2018
EDGAR ↗AT Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLCshared people, shared management entityNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund3$12,495,103
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
88
similar: 4–27
$100,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2020–2020

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Aug 18, 2020Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLCD/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$12,495,103
EDGAR ↗Feb 20, 2020Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLCD/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$3,466,906
EDGAR ↗Feb 19, 2020Advanced Technology Select Fund IX LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$3,466,906
EDGAR ↗Jul 20, 2018Private Market Securities Fund LLCD/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$24,729,946
EDGAR ↗Jun 30, 2017Private Market Securities Fund LLCD/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$16,672,641
EDGAR ↗Apr 25, 2017Private Market Securities Fund LLCD/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$9,220,796
EDGAR ↗Feb 28, 2017Private Market Securities Fund LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$4,781,249

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Aug 18, 2020. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2017–2020).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
KC Kevin ChenExecutive Officer, Promoter2Feb 28, 2017 → Aug 18, 2020
KM KAJJ Management LLC entityExecutive Officer, Promoter2Jun 30, 2017 → Aug 18, 2020

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Kajj.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Kajj as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Kajj's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #251,626 of 374,652 in line (17 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NEW YORK), NY). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.