PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:55 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

A

Atheronova

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Irvine, CA

Grouped because: 4 shared people, same business address (3 issuers), similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$1.05Mreported sold
66investors
12Form D filings
2010–2018active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group May 3, 2018 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Atheronova is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 12 Form D filings between Mar 2010 and May 2018.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 8 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.05M to 66 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Biotechnology (2), Pharmaceuticals (1). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $1.05M raised across the group, about $16K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Mark Selawski (3 issuers, executive officer), Thomas W. Gardner (3 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter), Boris Ratiner (2 issuers, director and promoter), Filiberto Zadini (2 issuers, director and promoter), Aaron Sandoval (1 issuer, executive officer and promoter) and 14 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing May 3, 2018.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 2 court cases matching the name, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 4 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 12 public filings for Atheronova and found 10 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: 4 bankruptcy cases name the subject or team members; 4 Form Ds were filed more than 15 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Atheronova has not run yet — it is joining a line of 28,969 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

2 cases: 1 judgment, 1 dismissed

CoreLink v. Phygen, LLC judgment
District Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 4:13-cv-01842 · Filed Sep 18, 2013 · Closed Jan 7, 2015 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Phygen, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2015-01-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
AESCULAP IMPLANT SYSTEMS, INC. v. ALLEZ SPINE, LLC dismissed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 5:09-cv-01943 · Filed May 6, 2009 · Closed Mar 11, 2010 · Nature of suit: 140 Negotiable instruments
Role of ALLEZ SPINE, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact former company name; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Atheronova..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

2 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

AtheroNova Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Atheronova)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:15-bk-11053 · Filed Mar 2, 2015 · Closed Jul 18, 2016
Role of AtheroNova Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2016-07-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA)
AtheroNova Operations, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:15-bk-11051 · Filed Mar 2, 2015 · Closed Jul 18, 2016
Role of AtheroNova Operations, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2016-07-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (CA)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

10 differences found between the filings for Atheronova — 2 worth asking about (compared 12 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jul 6, 1987 – Jul 18, 2016

4 bankruptcy cases name the subject or team members

Bankruptcy case: AtheroNova Inc. — filed Mar 2, 2015 · Bankruptcy case: AtheroNova Operations, Inc. — filed Mar 2, 2015 · Bankruptcy case: Fred G Knoll, Jr. — filed Feb 17, 2010 · Bankruptcy case: Filiberto Zadini — filed Jul 6, 1987

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Worth asking · Feb 5, 2008 – Nov 1, 2012

4 Form Ds were filed more than 15 days after the first sale

Form D filed 848 days after the first sale — AtheroNova Operations, Inc. · Form D filed 31 days after the first sale — AtheroNova Inc. · Form D filed 32 days after the first sale — AtheroNova Inc. · Form D filed 29 days after the first sale — AtheroNova Inc.

What this means Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves. A pattern of late paperwork is worth asking the sponsor about.

Sources
Note · Oct 1, 2012 – Apr 11, 2018

5 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Phygen, LLC (latest filing Apr 11, 2018) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — AtheroNova Inc. (latest filing Sep 16, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — AtheroNova Inc. (latest filing Mar 3, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — AtheroNova Inc. (latest filing Aug 21, 2013) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — AtheroNova Inc. (latest filing Nov 1, 2012)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Note · Jan 22, 2014 – Mar 3, 2014

Offering amount changed between filings — AtheroNova Inc.

The Jan 22, 2014 filing says $1,400,000 offered; the Mar 3, 2014 Form D/A says $2,000,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · May 12, 2011 – Dec 20, 2011

Offering amount changed between filings — AtheroNova Inc.

The May 12, 2011 filing says $1,000,000 offered; the Dec 20, 2011 Form D/A says $1,748,764.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2010 – Jun 11, 2010

Thomas W. Gardner is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Thomas Gardner" on 4 filings (from Mar 18, 2010), and "Thomas W. Gardner" on 8 filings (from Jun 11, 2010).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2010 – Jun 2, 2010

Address moved from Laguna Niguel, CA to Irvine, CA — AtheroNova Operations, Inc.

The people listed on the Mar 18, 2010 filing give Laguna Niguel, CA; on the Jun 2, 2010 filing they give Irvine, CA.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Jun 11, 2010 – Sep 16, 2014

Issuer used a different name before — AtheroNova Inc.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: AtheroNova, Inc.; Trist Holdings, Inc.; LandBank Group Inc. The current name on file is "AtheroNova Inc.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
Note · Mar 18, 2010 – Jun 2, 2010

Issuer used a different name before — AtheroNova Operations, Inc.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Z&Z Medical Holdings, Inc.. The current name on file is "AtheroNova Operations, Inc.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

2 of 10 offerings report sales commissions totalling $396,205; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
May 3, 2018 D
Phygen, LLC
File 021-311598
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Apr 11, 2018 D
Phygen, LLC
File 021-309878
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 16, 2014 D
AtheroNova Inc.
File 021-224793
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 3, 2014 D/A
AtheroNova Inc.
File 021-210541
$92,115$0$0Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation BrokerCheck CRD 25534 ↗
via Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation (CRD 25534 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
Aug 21, 2013 D
AtheroNova Inc.
File 021-201698
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Nov 1, 2012 D
AtheroNova Inc.
File 021-186400
$304,090$0$0Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation BrokerCheck CRD 25534 ↗
via Philadelphia Brokerage Corporation (CRD 25534 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
Dec 20, 2011 D/A
AtheroNova Inc.
File 021-159661
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 11, 2010 D
AtheroNova Inc.
File 021-143310
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 2, 2010 D
AtheroNova Operations, Inc.
File 021-142823
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 18, 2010 D
AtheroNova Operations, Inc.
File 021-139739
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:53 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Atheronova in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:53 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2007–2026) — 977,809 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:53 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2007–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:53 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗AO AtheroNova Operations, Inc.shared people, same business address, similar issuer namesIRVINE, CABiotechnology2$5,000,00018$25,0002010–2010
EDGAR ↗A AtheroNova Inc.shared people, same business address, similar issuer namesIRVINE, CAPharmaceuticals8$10,741,000
offering $1,000,000 · similar: $1,500,000–$10,000,000
47
similar: not enough data
No minimum reported
similar: not enough data
2010–2014
EDGAR ↗P Phygen, LLCshared people, same business addressIRVINE, CABiotechnology2$2,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $2,000,000–$19,999,994
1
similar: 2–16
No minimum reported
similar: $10,000–$50,000
2018–2018

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pharmaceuticals / 506(c) (33 filings); Biotechnology / 506(b) (3,253 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗May 3, 2018Phygen, LLCDBiotechnologyIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Apr 11, 2018Phygen, LLCDBiotechnology$3,000,000$2,000,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 16, 2014AtheroNova Inc.DPharmaceuticals$1,000,000$500,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 3, 2014AtheroNova Inc.D/APharmaceuticals$2,000,000$1,906,500
EDGAR ↗Jan 22, 2014AtheroNova Inc.DPharmaceuticals$1,400,000$350,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 21, 2013AtheroNova Inc.DPharmaceuticals$4,000,000$270,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 1, 2012AtheroNova Inc.DPharmaceuticals$5,000,000$2,925,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 20, 2011AtheroNova Inc.D/APharmaceuticals$1,748,764$1,748,764
EDGAR ↗May 12, 2011AtheroNova Inc.DPharmaceuticals$1,000,000$437,725
EDGAR ↗Jun 11, 2010AtheroNova Inc.DPharmaceuticals$10,741,000$10,741,000
EDGAR ↗Jun 2, 2010AtheroNova Operations, Inc.DBiotechnology$550,000$550,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 18, 2010AtheroNova Operations, Inc.DBiotechnology$5,000,000$5,000,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing May 3, 2018. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Biotechnology (2010), Pharmaceuticals (2010–2014). Latest offering: Biotechnology (2018; most recent May 3, 2018).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
MS Mark SelawskiExecutive Officer3Mar 18, 2010 → May 3, 2018
TG Thomas W. GardnerExecutive Officer, Director, Promoter3Mar 18, 2010 → May 3, 2018
BR Boris RatinerDirector, Promoter2Mar 18, 2010 → Sep 16, 2014
FZ Filiberto ZadiniDirector, Promoter2Mar 18, 2010 → Jun 11, 2010
TK Tom KulaDirector1Apr 11, 2018 → May 3, 2018
AT Amir David TaherniaDirector1Apr 11, 2018 → May 3, 2018
LK Lee KelleyDirector1Apr 11, 2018 → May 3, 2018
MR Mark RenfroDirector1Apr 11, 2018 → May 3, 2018
BG Ben GuiotDirector1Apr 11, 2018 → May 3, 2018
FK Frank KuwamuraDirector1Apr 11, 2018 → May 3, 2018
GF Gary FreemanDirector1Jun 11, 2010 → Sep 16, 2014
PD Paul DiPernaDirector1May 12, 2011 → Sep 16, 2014
CD Chaim DavisDirector1Jun 11, 2010 → Sep 16, 2014
AP Alexander PolinskyDirector1May 12, 2011 → Sep 16, 2014
JS Johan M SpoorDirector1Nov 1, 2012 → Sep 16, 2014
FK Fred KnollDirector1Aug 21, 2013 → Sep 16, 2014
AP Alexander PolinksyDirector1Nov 1, 2012 → Nov 1, 2012
GZ Giorgio ZadiniDirector, Promoter1Mar 18, 2010 → Jun 2, 2010
AS Aaron SandovalExecutive Officer, Promoter1Mar 18, 2010 → Mar 18, 2010

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Atheronova.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Atheronova as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Atheronova's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #312,647 of 374,652 in line (1,373 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: IRVINE), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.