PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 10:54 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

A

Acrobatiq

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Pittsburgh, PA

Grouped because: 8 shared people, 1 shared management entity, similar issuer names (2) · 3 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$9.67Mreported sold
48investors
9Form D filings
2010–2016active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Nov 23, 2016 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Acrobatiq is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 9 Form D filings between Apr 2010 and Nov 2016.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 6 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $9.67M to 48 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: "Other" (2), Other Technology (1). Issuers are based in PA (3).

What this means $9.67M raised across the group, about $202K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Dennis Farkos (3 issuers, executive officer), Jay Panzarella (3 issuers, executive officer), William L. Guttman (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Allison Pendergast (2 issuers, executive officer), Carnegie Innovations, LLC (2 issuers, promoter, entity) and 17 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Nov 23, 2016.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 3 court cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 3 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 9 public filings for Acrobatiq and found 17 differences, 3 worth asking the sponsor about: Dennis Farkos is no longer listed on the Jan 27, 2016 amendment; Jay Panzarella is no longer listed on the Dec 10, 2015 amendment; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Acrobatiq has not run yet — it is joining a line of 63,054 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 747 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: Bing (site:reddit.com / site:biggerpockets.com) and Reddit's own search, plus DuckDuckGo/Brave/BiggerPockets search when they are answering.

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

3 cases: 1 open, 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

PANOPTO, INC. v. NEC CORPORATION open
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 4:25-mc-00003 · Filed Feb 25, 2025
Role of PANOPTO, INC.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
PANOPTO, INC. v. NEC CORPORATION closed
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:25-mc-00064 · Filed Jan 24, 2025 · Closed Feb 25, 2025
Role of PANOPTO, INC.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2025-02-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the issuer's state (PA)
Panopto Inc v. Vitek-IP LLC closed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:21-cv-01649 · Filed Dec 8, 2021 · Closed Feb 22, 2022
Role of Panopto Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2022-02-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: 48 regulators (FINRA, NASAA, 37 states) — crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Acrobatiq..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (64,910 actions): FINRA (38,350 actions, 1995–2026), NASAA (31 actions, 2000–2026; listing starts 1997), AK Division of Banking and Securities (273 actions, 1971–2025), AL Securities Commission (880 actions, 2001–2026), AR Securities Department (1,305 actions, 1998–2026), AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), CO Division of Securities (731 actions, 2001–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-05-02)), CT Department of Banking Securities Division (940 actions, 2006–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-04-22)), DC DISB Securities Bureau (25 actions, 2012–2026), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), FL Office of Financial Regulation (49 actions, 2018–2026), GA Secretary of State Securities Division (65 actions, 2015–2026; listing starts 2012), HI DCCA Securities Enforcement Branch (26 actions, 2012–2026), ID Department of Finance Securities Bureau (663 actions, 1994–2026), IL Secretary of State Securities Department (4,122 actions, 2003–2023), KS Insurance Department Securities Division (58 actions), KY Department of Financial Institutions (342 actions, 2005–2026), LA Office of Financial Institutions Securities Division (13 actions, 2010–2025; listing starts 2008), MA Secretary of the Commonwealth Securities Division (125 actions, 2012–2025; live site blocks automated access — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-02-04), MD Attorney General Securities Division (1,054 actions, 2004–2026), ME Office of Securities (539 actions, 2000–2026), MI LARA Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau (201 actions), MO Secretary of State Securities Division (919 actions, 1998–2026), MS Secretary of State Securities Division (209 actions, 1995–2026), MT Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (597 actions, 2000–2026), NC Secretary of State Securities Division (265 actions, 2004–2024), ND Securities Department (711 actions, 1990–2026; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-01-06), NH Bureau of Securities Regulation (402 actions, 2002–2026), NM Regulation and Licensing Department Securities Division (90 actions, 2010–2025), NV Secretary of State Securities Division (118 actions, 2018–2026), NY Attorney General Investor Protection Bureau (44 actions, 2012–2026), OH Division of Securities (327 actions, 1993–2006), OK Department of Securities (2,531 actions, 1998–2026), OR Division of Financial Regulation (589 actions, 1988–2026), PA Department of Banking and Securities (1,448 actions, 2008–2024; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-08-09), RI DBR Securities Division (98 actions, 2005–2025), SC Attorney General Securities Division (540 actions, 2006–2026), SD Division of Insurance – Securities Regulation (106 actions, 2017–2026), TN Department of Commerce and Insurance Securities Division (405 actions, 1992–2026), TX State Securities Board (936 actions, 1999–2026), UT Division of Securities (772 actions, 2000–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2010-05-27)), VT DFR Securities Division (137 actions, 2010–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026), WI DFI Division of Securities (1,072 actions, 1998–2026), WV Securities Commission (State Auditor) (64 actions), WY Secretary of State Compliance Division (6 actions, 2016–2024) — last crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

None found in sources searched — federal bankruptcy courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

17 differences found between the filings for Acrobatiq — 3 worth asking about (compared 9 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Jan 27, 2016

24% of the money raised went to insiders — Acrobatiq, Inc.

The Jan 27, 2016 Form D/A reports $10,402,997 sold and $2,500,000 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters (marked as an estimate).

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Sources
Note · Jul 10, 2015 – Jul 27, 2015

Form D filed 17 days after the first sale — Acrobatiq, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Jul 10, 2015. The Form D was filed Jul 27, 2015 — 17 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Nov 14, 2016 – Nov 23, 2016

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Acrobatiq, Inc. (latest filing Nov 23, 2016)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Nov 23, 2016 (first sale Nov 14, 2016). It reports $5,000,000 sold of $6,500,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jul 10, 2015 – Jan 27, 2016

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Acrobatiq, Inc. (latest filing Jan 27, 2016)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jan 27, 2016 (first sale Jul 10, 2015). It reports $10,402,997 sold of $12,566,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Dec 11, 2014 – Feb 4, 2015

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Acrobatiq, LLC (latest filing Feb 4, 2015)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Feb 4, 2015 (first sale Dec 11, 2014). It reports $2,275,000 sold of $4,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Worth asking · Dec 10, 2015 – Jan 27, 2016

Dennis Farkos is no longer listed on the Jan 27, 2016 amendment — Acrobatiq, Inc.

Dennis Farkos appears on the Dec 10, 2015 Form D/A (executive officer) but not on the Jan 27, 2016 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Worth asking · Jul 27, 2015 – Dec 10, 2015

Jay Panzarella is no longer listed on the Dec 10, 2015 amendment — Acrobatiq, Inc.

Jay Panzarella appears on the Jul 27, 2015 Form D (executive officer) but not on the Dec 10, 2015 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Dec 10, 2015 – Jan 27, 2016

William L. Guttman's role changed at Acrobatiq, Inc.: executive officer, director → director

The Dec 10, 2015 filing lists William L. Guttman as executive officer, director; the Jan 27, 2016 Form D/A lists director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Apr 12, 2010 – Jan 4, 2011

Eric Burns's role changed at Panopto, Inc.: director → executive officer, director

The Apr 12, 2010 filing lists Eric Burns as director; the Jan 4, 2011 Form D lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Dec 10, 2015 – Jan 27, 2016

Offering amount changed between filings — Acrobatiq, Inc.

The Dec 10, 2015 filing says $9,270,004 offered; the Jan 27, 2016 Form D/A says $12,566,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Apr 12, 2010 – Jan 4, 2011

Reported revenue range changed between filings — Panopto, Inc.

"$1 - $1,000,000" (Apr 12, 2010); then "Decline to Disclose" (Jan 4, 2011).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Sources
Worth asking · Dec 9, 2014 – Jul 27, 2015

2 separate companies in this group use the same name: "Acrobatiq, LLC"

CIK 1626872 (first filed Dec 9, 2014, Pittsburgh, PA); CIK 1648126 (first filed Jul 27, 2015, Pittsburgh, PA).

What this means Two legal entities with one name can make it unclear which one you invested in. Match the CIK and the SEC file number on your documents, not just the name.

Sources
Note · Nov 23, 2016

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Acrobatiq, Inc.

The latest filing lists 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 625, Suite 625, Pittsburgh, PA. That address is used by 8 issuers in our index (8 issuers in 6 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Sources
Note · Feb 4, 2015

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Acrobatiq, LLC

The latest filing lists 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 625, Pittsburgh, PA. That address is used by 8 issuers in our index (8 issuers in 6 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Sources
Note · Jun 21, 2013 – Nov 23, 2016

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Delaware (2), Pennsylvania (1) — out of 3 member issuers. The odd ones out: Acrobatiq, LLC (Pennsylvania).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

1 of 6 offerings reports sales commissions totalling $732,000; 0 report finder's fees; 1 reports proceeds to related persons totalling $2,500,000. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Nov 23, 2016 D
Acrobatiq, Inc.
File 021-275083
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 27, 2016 D/A
Acrobatiq, Inc.
File 021-244468
$732,000 (est.)$0$2,500,000 (est.)East Wind Securities, LLC BrokerCheck CRD 148032 ↗EDGAR ↗
Feb 4, 2015 D/A
Acrobatiq, LLC
File 021-229720
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 21, 2013 D
Panopto, Inc.
File 021-198427
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 4, 2011 D
Panopto, Inc.
File 021-152979
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Apr 12, 2010 D
Panopto, Inc.
File 021-140433
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 10:16 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Acrobatiq in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 10:16 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026) — 1,032,426 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027) — 285,535 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 514,336 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published) — 538,619 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026) — 1,263,035 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published); Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026); also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed. Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 8:30 AM ET; King County WA Assessor Real Property Sales extract (EXTR_RPSale.csv) Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Palm Beach 60) Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Broward 16) Oct 24, 2026, 8:24 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 24, 2026, 8:23 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 24, 2026, 8:21 AM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗P Panopto, Inc.shared people, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PITTSBURGH, PAOther Technology3$3,977,56417$20,0002010–2013
EDGAR ↗A Acrobatiq, LLCshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PITTSBURGH, PAOther2$2,275,000
offering $4,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
21
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2014–2015
EDGAR ↗A Acrobatiq, Inc.shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PITTSBURGH, PAOther4$10,402,997
offering $6,500,000 · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
10
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2015–2016

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other / 506(b) (18,678 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Nov 23, 2016Acrobatiq, Inc.DOther$6,500,000$5,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 27, 2016Acrobatiq, Inc.D/AOther$12,566,000$10,402,997
EDGAR ↗Dec 10, 2015Acrobatiq, Inc.D/AOther$9,270,004$7,725,004
EDGAR ↗Jul 27, 2015Acrobatiq, Inc.DOther$9,270,004$7,725,004
EDGAR ↗Feb 4, 2015Acrobatiq, LLCD/AOther$4,000,000$2,275,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 9, 2014Acrobatiq, LLCDOther$4,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Jun 21, 2013Panopto, Inc.DOther Technology$2,399,162$2,399,162
EDGAR ↗Jan 4, 2011Panopto, Inc.DOther Technology$3,977,564$3,977,564
EDGAR ↗Apr 12, 2010Panopto, Inc.DOther Technology$1,687,080$1,687,080

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Nov 23, 2016. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other Technology (2010–2013). Latest offering: Other (2014–2016; most recent Nov 23, 2016).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
WG William L. GuttmanExecutive Officer, Director3Apr 12, 2010 → Nov 23, 2016
DF Dennis FarkosExecutive Officer3Jun 21, 2013 → Dec 10, 2015
JP Jay PanzarellaExecutive Officer3Apr 12, 2010 → Jul 27, 2015
EF Eric FrankExecutive Officer, Director2Dec 9, 2014 → Nov 23, 2016
CK Charles A. KennedyDirector2Dec 9, 2014 → Nov 23, 2016
CI Carnegie Innovations, LLC entityPromoter2Dec 9, 2014 → Nov 23, 2016
FJ Farnam JahanianDirector2Dec 9, 2014 → Nov 23, 2016
LR Lukman RamseyExecutive Officer2Dec 9, 2014 → Jan 27, 2016
AP Allison PendergastExecutive Officer2Dec 9, 2014 → Jan 27, 2016
SE Scott EnglishDirector1Jul 27, 2015 → Nov 23, 2016
RW Richard WonsettlerExecutive Officer1Dec 10, 2015 → Nov 23, 2016
JK J. A. KatarincicDirector1Jul 27, 2015 → Nov 23, 2016
JR John RinderleExecutive Officer1Dec 10, 2015 → Nov 23, 2016
MN Michelle NeilExecutive Officer1Nov 23, 2016 → Nov 23, 2016
AP Alison PendergastExecutive Officer1Nov 23, 2016 → Nov 23, 2016
PC Phil CharlandExecutive Officer1Jan 27, 2016 → Jan 27, 2016
JL John LehoczkyDirector1Dec 9, 2014 → Feb 4, 2015
JS Jeffrey SolomonDirector1Dec 9, 2014 → Feb 4, 2015
EB Eric BurnsExecutive Officer, Director1Apr 12, 2010 → Jun 21, 2013
WS William ScherlisDirector1Apr 12, 2010 → Jun 21, 2013
MK Mark KamletDirector1Jan 4, 2011 → Jun 21, 2013
LK Lawrence KinsellaExecutive Officer1Apr 12, 2010 → Jan 4, 2011

Business registration (state registry / Secretary of State)

1 of 3 issuers have a matched state registry record — records by status: active 1.

Registries searched: AL (Alabama Secretary of State — Business Entity Records (arc-sos.state.al.us), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); CO (Colorado Secretary of State — Business Entities in Colorado (data.colorado.gov), data as of Oct 23, 2026); CT (Connecticut Secretary of the State — Business Registry (data.ct.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026); FL (Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations — quarterly corporate data file (Sunbiz), data as of Oct 7, 2026); KY (Kentucky Secretary of State — Business Entity Search (sosbes.sos.ky.gov), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); NY (New York Department of State — Corporations and Other Entities (data.ny.gov: All Filings + Active Corporations), data as of Oct 20, 2026); OR (Oregon Secretary of State — Active Businesses, All (data.oregon.gov), data as of Oct 20, 2026); PA (Pennsylvania Department of State — Registered Businesses, Current (data.pa.gov), data as of Oct 6, 2026); TX (Texas Comptroller — Active Franchise Taxpayers incl. Secretary of State file data (data.texas.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026). Registries of other states have not been searched: many publish no bulk file and require a CAPTCHA or bot challenge on their search page, which we do not bypass (Delaware, for example, offers no public bulk file). A registry listing is the state's own record of the entity; it says nothing about the offering itself.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Acrobatiq.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Acrobatiq as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Acrobatiq's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #279,417 of 374,652 in line (1,386 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: PITTSBURGH), PA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.