The short version
Durham Developer, LLC is a limited liability company organized in Delaware (formed 2023), based in Murfreesboro, TN, one of 29 issuers in the sponsor group Vintage.
What this means This is one deal company run by a team with 29 companies on file. The group page shows the whole team's track record; this page is the one deal.
It has filed 1 Form D filing (Apr 17, 2023) for 1 offering, commercial under Rule 506(b): $5.5M sold of $5.5M offered to 3 investors, first sale Apr 6, 2023.
What this means 100% of the target was sold by the filing date — about $1.83M per investor. Rule 506(b) means no public advertising; up to 35 non-accredited investors may take part.
Key people as listed: Drew Cox (director), Ross Bradely (director), Timothy G. Keach (executive officer and promoter) and TDK Land, (director, entity).
What this means These are the people the company itself named as running or promoting it. Tap a name to see every other deal they are on.
No sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders are reported. No sales-compensation recipients are listed.
What this means No broker was paid — the sponsor sold it directly to investors.
Sister issuers in the group include Vintage Raleigh West Holdings, LP, Vintage Durham Holdings, LP, Vintage Brunswick Holdings, LLC and 25 more.
Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; no amendment on file; latest filing Apr 17, 2023.
What this means No new raise filed in the past year — this deal company may be done raising, or simply quiet.
Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Durham Developer, LLC.
Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 2 court cases matching the name, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.
What this means 4 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.