17 cases: 3 open, 6 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 7 dismissed, 1 judgment
Lingerfelt v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company open
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:26-cv-02142 · Filed Sep 23, 2026
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. State Farm Insurance Company closed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:24-cv-00509 · Filed Feb 2, 2024 · Closed Mar 17, 2025
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2025-03-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Aetna Life Insurance Company closed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:22-cv-22793 · Filed Sep 1, 2022 · Closed Feb 17, 2023
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2023-02-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Murphy Company closed
District Court, D. Oregon · No. 6:21-cv-01825 · Filed Dec 16, 2021 · Closed Oct 14, 2022
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2022-10-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OR (not a filing state)
LINGERFELT v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC closed
District Court, N.D. Florida · No. 5:19-cv-00479 · Filed Nov 19, 2019 · Closed Jun 23, 2021
Role of LINGERFELT:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-06-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Sanofi US Services Inc. open
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:19-cv-10833 · Filed May 30, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Janssen Research & Development LLC dismissed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:19-cv-07087 · Filed Apr 2, 2019 · Closed Oct 15, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-10-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Janssen Research & Development LLC open
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:16-cv-10315 · Filed Jun 15, 2016 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a/ Fresenius Medical Care North America dismissed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:13-cv-11959 · Filed Aug 14, 2013 · Closed Dec 12, 2018 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2018-12-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MA (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:12-cv-01114 · Filed May 7, 2012 · Closed Jul 26, 2012 ·
Nature of suit:
490 Cable/Satellite TV
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2012-07-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Bank of the Ozarks v. Lingerfelt judgment
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 4:11-cv-00261 · Filed Oct 19, 2011 · Closed Dec 16, 2011 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Lingerfelt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2011-12-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Lingerfelt dismissed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 3:09-cv-00581 · Filed Sep 16, 2009 · Closed Dec 9, 2009 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Lingerfelt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2009-12-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in VA (not a filing state)
DirecTV, Inc. v. Lingerfelt dismissed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:03-cv-01416 · Filed May 22, 2003 · Closed May 12, 2004 ·
Nature of suit:
370 Other fraud
Role of Lingerfelt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2004-05-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
Fort Sill National v. Lingerfelt dismissed
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · No. 7:00-cv-00033 · Filed Feb 18, 2000 · Closed Sep 8, 2000 ·
Nature of suit:
430 Banks and banking
Role of Lingerfelt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2000-09-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NC (not a filing state)
LINGERFELT v. CSX TRANSPORTATION closed
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. · Filed Feb 21, 1996 · Closed Feb 24, 2000 ·
Nature of suit:
330 Federal employers' liability
Role of LINGERFELT:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2000-02-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
LINGERFELT, ET AL v. CSX TRANSPORTATION closed
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. · Filed Mar 10, 1995 · Closed Sep 16, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
330 Federal employers' liability
Role of LINGERFELT:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-09-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Lingerfelt v. CSX Transportation dismissed
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 2:96-cv-00332 · Filed Mar 10, 1995 · Closed Sep 16, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
863 D.I.W.C. / D.I.W.W.
Role of Lingerfelt:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-09-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 59 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:57 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.