25 cases: 2 open, 12 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 10 dismissed, 1 judgment
Stites v. Medicalodges, Inc. open
District Court, D. Kansas · No. 2:25-cv-02396 · Filed Jul 21, 2025
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in KS (not a filing state)
Stites v. AmerAssist A/R Solutions, Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:22-cv-00237 · Filed Apr 11, 2022 · Closed Nov 16, 2022
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2022-11-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Stites v. AmerAssist A/R Solutions, Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:21-cv-00766 · Filed Oct 21, 2021 · Closed Feb 14, 2022
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2022-02-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Stites v. LVNV Funding, LLC closed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:21-cv-00670 · Filed Sep 17, 2021 · Closed Oct 22, 2021
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-10-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Regions Bank v. Stites closed
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · No. 1:20-cv-00240 · Filed Nov 19, 2020 · Closed Feb 11, 2021 ·
Nature of suit:
Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-02-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MS (not a filing state)
Stites v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC dismissed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:18-cv-09768 · Filed Oct 19, 2018 · Closed May 21, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-05-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: want of prosecution Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Stites & Harbison, PLLC v. Citibank N.A. (PLR2) dismissed
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · No. 3:15-cv-00379 · Filed Aug 26, 2015 · Closed Mar 30, 2018 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Stites & Harbison, PLLC:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2018-03-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Stites v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc dismissed
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · No. 6:14-cv-01556 · Filed Jun 13, 2014 · Closed Jan 6, 2016 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2016-01-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Stites v. Dodd Enterprises, Inc. dismissed
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · No. 2:13-cv-02171 · Filed Jul 1, 2013 · Closed Nov 12, 2014 ·
Nature of suit:
450 Interstate commerce
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2014-11-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in AR (not a filing state)
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Stites dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:12-cv-11959 · Filed May 1, 2012 · Closed Oct 16, 2012 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2012-10-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
STITES v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:11-cv-04159 · Filed Jun 27, 2011 · Closed Sep 9, 2011 ·
Nature of suit:
480 Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
· Cause:
15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Role of STITES:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2011-09-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in PA (not a filing state)
Stites & Harbison, PLLC v. Frentz closed
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · No. 3:08-mc-00012 · Filed Feb 13, 2008 · Closed Feb 20, 2009
Role of Stites & Harbison, PLLC:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2009-02-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in KY (not a filing state)
J & J Sports Production, Inc. v. Stites dismissed
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · No. 2:07-cv-02069 · Filed Jul 13, 2007 · Closed Jan 17, 2008 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other statutory actions
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2008-01-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in AR (not a filing state)
Miller v. Stites & Harbison, PLLC open
District Court, D. Oregon · No. 3:06-mc-09260 · Filed Oct 25, 2006
Role of Stites & Harbison, PLLC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OR (not a filing state)
Stites v. Eli Lilly & Co. dismissed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-04631 · Filed Aug 31, 2006 · Closed Mar 18, 2008 ·
Nature of suit:
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
· Cause:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2008-03-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
Miller Family Trust v. Stites & Harbison, PLLC closed
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. 3:06-mc-00034 · Filed Apr 19, 2006 · Closed Apr 19, 2006
Role of Stites & Harbison, PLLC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2006-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
51% Cash Stores LLC v. Stites closed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 4:05-cv-00401 · Filed Jun 23, 2005 · Closed Nov 8, 2005 ·
Nature of suit:
423 Bankruptcy withdrawal 28 USC 157
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2005-11-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (TX)
In Re: Fireman's Fund Insur v. Stites closed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:92-mc-00057 · Filed Apr 6, 1992 · Closed Dec 2, 1992
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-12-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in WA (not a filing state)
Fireman's Fund Ins v. Stites closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:91-mc-27848 · Filed Sep 25, 1991 · Closed Mar 24, 1993
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-03-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Fireman's Fund Ins v. Stites closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:91-mc-27742 · Filed Sep 5, 1991 · Closed Mar 22, 1993
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-03-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Fireman's Fund Ins v. Stites closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:91-mc-27743 · Filed Sep 5, 1991 · Closed Mar 22, 1993
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-03-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Firemans Fund Ins Co v. Stites closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:91-mc-27590 · Filed Aug 9, 1991 · Closed Feb 28, 1992
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-02-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Stites v. Consol Rail Corp dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:90-cv-04388 · Filed Aug 1, 1990 · Closed Nov 5, 1990 ·
Nature of suit:
330 Federal employers' liability
Role of Stites:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1990-11-05 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Fireman's Fund Ins v. Stites judgment
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:90-cv-00389 · Filed Mar 28, 1990 · Closed Sep 25, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
· Cause:
18:1961
Role of Stites:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-09-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
STITES v. SUNDSTRAND HEAT INC dismissed
District Court, W.D. Michigan · No. · Filed Jul 20, 1984 · Closed Mar 10, 1988 ·
Nature of suit:
893 Environmental matters
Role of STITES:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-03-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 72 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:51 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.