Stephen Pilch is listed as an executive officer and director on 7 SEC Form D filings by 7 issuers between Jun 2009 and Nov 2025. Largest by amount reported sold: TLF Logistics, L.P. (San Francisco, CA — pooled investment fund — 2009; $403M reported sold to 2 investors), SCG Logistics REIT, LLC (San Francisco, CA — reits and finance — 2025; $125K reported sold to 125 investors), Stockbridge Fund III Catalina II Investment, LLC (San Francisco, CA — reits and finance — 2023; $125K reported sold to 125 investors), SF 300 Kansas Holding, LLC (San Francisco, CA — reits and finance — 2021; $125K reported sold to 125 investors), Watertown 64 Grove Holding, LLC (San Francisco, CA — reits and finance — 2021; $125K reported sold to 125 investors) and 2 more (all listed below).
What this means A repeat sponsor — 7 separate companies raised money with this person listed as executive officer and director, over about 16 years. Across those companies the filings report $403.8M sold in total.
Listed alongside Ethan McCall (4 shared filings), James Ratner (4 shared filings), John S. Grassi (4 shared filings), Rajiv A. Patel (4 shared filings), Susan L. Baker (4 shared filings) and 18 others.
What this means These are the other officers, directors or promoters the companies named on the same forms — the team around Stephen. Each name links to their own page.
All 7 issuers belong to the sponsor group Stockbridge (66 issuers, $13.3B reported sold, 2009–2026).
What this means A sponsor group is one team that sets up a new company for each deal. Stockbridge has 66 companies on file and $13.3B reported sold in total — the group page shows the whole track record in one place.
Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA) — 3 court cases matching the name, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.
What this means 5 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.