15 cases: 8 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 4 dismissed, 3 judgment
Jim Pandol and Company, Inc. v. Gutville Produce LLC closed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 7:21-cv-00398 · Filed Oct 14, 2021 · Closed Dec 28, 2021
Role of Jim Pandol and Company, Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-12-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (jim); court in TX (not a filing state)
Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc. v. Thomas S. Espineda dismissed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 5:16-cv-02050 · Filed Sep 27, 2016 · Closed Sep 18, 2017 ·
Nature of suit:
891 Agricultural acts
Role of Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2017-09-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc. closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:15-mc-00060 · Filed Nov 3, 2015 · Closed Nov 4, 2015 ·
Nature of suit:
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
· Cause:
Civil Miscellaneous Case
Role of Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2015-11-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
John Pandol v. Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC dismissed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:15-cv-07794 · Filed Oct 5, 2015 · Closed Jan 28, 2016 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
47:0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Role of John Pandol:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2016-01-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (john); court in the person's filing state (CA)
Jim Pandol and Company, Inc. v. Steven Produce King, Inc. dismissed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:15-cv-02711 · Filed May 12, 2015 · Closed Dec 29, 2015 ·
Nature of suit:
891 Agricultural acts
Role of Jim Pandol and Company, Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2015-12-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (jim); court in NY (not a filing state)
H&C Global Supplies SA DE CV v. Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc. judgment
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:13-cv-00827 · Filed May 30, 2013 · Closed Nov 6, 2013 ·
Nature of suit:
Agriculture Acts
· Cause:
07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Role of Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2013-11-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc. v. Robinson Company judgment
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:11-cv-01829 · Filed Oct 31, 2011 · Closed May 7, 2013 ·
Nature of suit:
Agriculture Acts
· Cause:
07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Role of Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2013-05-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Chiquita Fresh v. Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:07-cv-01313 · Filed Sep 6, 2007 · Closed Sep 10, 2007 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other statutory actions
Role of Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2007-09-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Chiquita Fresh v. Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:07-cv-01305 · Filed Sep 6, 2007 · Closed Mar 20, 2008 ·
Nature of suit:
Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Role of Pandol Associates Marketing, Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2008-03-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Pandol Bros., Inc. v. Gadco Fruits Limited closed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:93-cv-00840 · Filed May 3, 1993 · Closed May 3, 1993
Role of Pandol Bros., Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-05-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Pandol Bros Inc v. Florida-Georgia closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:91-cv-00411 · Filed Jul 26, 1991 · Closed Oct 23, 1991
Role of Pandol Bros Inc:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1991-10-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Pandol Bros Inc v. All United Fruit closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:91-cv-00343 · Filed Jul 3, 1991 · Closed Sep 20, 1991
Role of Pandol Bros Inc:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1991-09-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Munoz Y Cia v. Pandol Bros Inc dismissed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:91-cv-00332 · Filed Jun 28, 1991 · Closed Dec 30, 1992 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Pandol Bros Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-12-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Turbana Corporation v. Pandol Brothers closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:88-cv-00063 · Filed Feb 1, 1988 · Closed Mar 13, 1989
Role of Pandol Brothers:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1989-03-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
PANDOL BROS INC v. PURITY SUPREME INC judgment
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. · Filed Jun 5, 1985 · Closed Nov 27, 1987 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of PANDOL BROS INC:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1987-11-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on court trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (1 person in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MA (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:54 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.