15 cases: 2 open, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 8 dismissed, 1 judgment
Cheesman v. Costco Wholesale Corporation open
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:26-cv-03058 · Filed Apr 30, 2026
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in AZ (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. Williams & Fudge, Inc. closed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:24-cv-01264 · Filed Apr 10, 2024 · Closed Sep 25, 2024 ·
Nature of suit:
Consumer Credit
· Cause:
15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2024-09-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. open
District Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 2:23-cv-00871 · Filed Mar 3, 2023
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The closed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:22-cv-01559 · Filed Jun 13, 2022 · Closed Apr 24, 2023
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2023-04-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MN (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. SunTrust Bank dismissed
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:18-cv-02749 · Filed Nov 8, 2018 · Closed Jul 15, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-07-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. Collectcorp Corporation dismissed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:08-cv-02242 · Filed Dec 19, 2008 · Closed Apr 10, 2009 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2009-04-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. ESR Agency, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:08-cv-02910 · Filed Sep 30, 2008 · Closed Jul 22, 2009 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other statutory actions
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2009-07-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Monsanto Company v. Cheesman Seed Company dismissed
District Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 4:08-cv-00463 · Filed Apr 4, 2008 · Closed Feb 9, 2009 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Role of Cheesman Seed Company:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2009-02-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Monsanto Company v. Cheesman Seed Company dismissed
District Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 4:08-cv-00464 · Filed Apr 4, 2008 · Closed Apr 14, 2008 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Role of Cheesman Seed Company:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2008-04-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Directv, Inc. v. Cheesman dismissed
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:03-cv-00372 · Filed Mar 3, 2003 · Closed Mar 23, 2004 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other statutory actions
Role of Cheesman:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2004-03-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. Encompass Medical Group, P.A. closed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:02-cv-01099 · Filed Nov 26, 2002 · Closed Apr 11, 2003
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2003-04-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Cheesman v. Acuson Corporation dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:93-cv-20564 · Filed Jul 30, 1993 · Closed Aug 6, 1997 ·
Nature of suit:
850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Cheesman:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1997-08-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: want of prosecution Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
PGH. NAT'L BANK v. CHEESMAN dismissed
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:88-cv-01000 · Filed May 3, 1988 · Closed Nov 17, 1989 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of CHEESMAN:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1989-11-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in PA (not a filing state)
Fireman's INS CO v. Cheesman closed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:87-cv-71053 · Filed Mar 20, 1987 · Closed Sep 28, 1987
Role of Cheesman:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1987-09-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
RIB-ROOF INDUS v. CHEESMAN DEV CORP dismissed
District Court, D. Utah · No. · Filed Apr 4, 1986 · Closed Aug 30, 1988 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of CHEESMAN DEV CORP:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-08-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 44 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (UT)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:35 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.