11 cases: 3 dismissed, 6 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 2 judgment
Joshua Kopple v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:18-cv-23207 · Filed Aug 7, 2018 · Closed Aug 24, 2018 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Role of Joshua Kopple:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2018-08-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); different first name (joshua); court in FL (not a filing state)
Joshua Kopple v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:18-cv-02460 · Filed Mar 27, 2018 · Closed Aug 1, 2018 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Role of Joshua Kopple:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2018-08-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); different first name (joshua); court in the person's filing state (CA)
KOPPLE v. AR RESOURCES, INC. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:14-cv-06118 · Filed Oct 27, 2014 · Closed May 29, 2015 ·
Nature of suit:
480 Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
· Cause:
15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Role of KOPPLE:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2015-05-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in PA (not a filing state)
Kopple v. Schick Farms, Ltd dismissed
District Court, N.D. Iowa · No. 3:05-cv-03003 · Filed Jan 18, 2005 · Closed Oct 26, 2006 ·
Nature of suit:
Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Kopple:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2006-10-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IA (not a filing state)
Bk Julius Baer & Co v. Kopple closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:92-cv-08053 · Filed Dec 9, 1992 · Closed Dec 9, 1992
Role of Kopple:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-12-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Bank Julius Baer v. Kopple closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 1:92-mc-00129 · Filed Dec 9, 1992 · Closed Dec 31, 1993
Role of Kopple:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-12-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Bank Julius Baer Co v. Kopple closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:92-mc-29137 · Filed Dec 8, 1992 · Closed Dec 1, 1993
Role of Kopple:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-12-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Bank Julius Baer & v. Kopple closed
District Court, E.D. California · No. 2:92-mc-00236 · Filed Sep 3, 1992 · Closed Dec 31, 1993
Role of Kopple:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-12-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Bank Julius Baer & C v. Kopple closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:92-fj-00047 · Filed Sep 1, 1992 · Closed Jan 1, 2005
Role of Kopple:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2005-01-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (CA)
Bank Julius Baer & v. Kopple judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:91-cv-03186 · Filed May 9, 1991 · Closed May 22, 1992 ·
Nature of suit:
140 Negotiable instruments
Role of Kopple:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-05-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
AMER PRECIOUS METAL CORP v. KOPPLE ETAL judgment
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. · Filed Mar 9, 1990 · Closed Jul 31, 1990 ·
Nature of suit:
370 Other fraud
Role of KOPPLE ETAL:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1990-07-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 13 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts; live RECAP re-check pending. State courts: not yet searched. PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 3:04 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not yet searched. No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.