10 cases: 2 open, 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 2 judgment, 3 dismissed
Deary v. Metro Brokers, Inc. open
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:25-cv-05622 · Filed Oct 1, 2025
Role of Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
Deary v. Exactech, Inc. open
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:23-cv-07279 · Filed Sep 29, 2023
Role of Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
DEARY v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc closed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 3:23-cv-10415 · Filed Feb 3, 2023 · Closed Feb 3, 2023
Role of DEARY:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2023-02-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Deary v. Great LAkes Acquisition Corp d/b/a Great Lakes Caring closed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:21-cv-11587 · Filed Jul 7, 2021 · Closed Nov 10, 2021 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Role of Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-11-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. d/b/a Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. II d/b/a Great Lakes Caring v. Deary judgment
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:19-cv-11502 · Filed May 22, 2019 · Closed Oct 4, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Deary:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-10-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Deary v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. dismissed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:17-cv-00235 · Filed Jan 19, 2017 · Closed May 16, 2017 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
47:0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Role of Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2017-05-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
Grover Lee Deary v. CitiFinancial Servicing LLC dismissed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:16-cv-01199 · Filed Feb 22, 2016 · Closed Apr 21, 2016 ·
Nature of suit:
220 Real Property: Foreclosure
· Cause:
28:1441 Notice of Removal
Role of Grover Lee Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2016-04-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); different first name (lee); court in CA (not a filing state)
Deary v. Janssen Research & Development LLC closed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:15-cv-03685 · Filed Aug 21, 2015 · Closed Aug 25, 2021 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-08-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Charles Deary v. Vital Pharmaceuticals Inc judgment
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:12-cv-04314 · Filed May 18, 2012 · Closed Nov 14, 2012 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of Charles Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2012-11-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); different first name (charles); court in CA (not a filing state)
Deary v. Raytheon Company dismissed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:92-cv-10352 · Filed Feb 11, 1992 · Closed Aug 20, 1992 ·
Nature of suit:
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Deary:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-08-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 20 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (MA)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:55 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.