Nishant Kumar is listed as an executive officer on 14 SEC Form D filings by 5 issuers between Mar 2023 and Oct 2026: Kotak Iconic Fund (Mumbai, India (as filed: K7) — pooled investment fund — 2023–2026; $289.3M reported sold to 849 investors), Kotak Iconic Fund II (Mumbai, India (as filed: K7) — pooled investment fund — 2024–2026; $188.4M reported sold to 755 investors), Kotak Iconic India Equity Feeder Fund (Gift City, Gandhinagar, India (as filed: K7) — pooled investment fund — 2025–2026; $11M reported sold to 47 investors), Kotak Optimus India Allocation Moderate Scheme (Mumbai, India (as filed: K7) — pooled investment fund — 2023–2026; $7.4M reported sold to 4 investors) and Kotak Optimus India Allocation Aggressive Scheme (Mumbai, India (as filed: K7) — pooled investment fund — 2023–2026; $4.99M reported sold to 10 investors).
What this means A repeat sponsor — 5 separate companies raised money with this person listed as executive officer, over about 3 years. Across those companies the filings report $501.1M sold in total.
Listed alongside Dipak Gupta (14 shared filings), Gaurang Shah (14 shared filings), Oisharya Das (14 shared filings), Rajeev Saptarshi (14 shared filings), Sriniwasan Subramanian (14 shared filings) and 9 others.
What this means These are the other officers, directors or promoters the companies named on the same forms — the team around Nishant. Each name links to their own page.
All 5 issuers belong to the sponsor group Kotak Iconic (7 issuers, $505M reported sold, 2016–2026).
What this means A sponsor group is one team that sets up a new company for each deal. Kotak Iconic has 7 companies on file and $505M reported sold in total — the group page shows the whole track record in one place.
Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA) — 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.
What this means 1 record came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.