22 cases: 22 closed (disposition not in docket feed)
Photo Stencil, LLC v. Forum Financial Services, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · No. 17-01029 · Filed Jan 26, 2017 · Closed Mar 14, 2019
Role of Photo Stencil, LLC:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Case closed 2019-03-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (llc); court in CO (not a filing state)
Photo Stencil, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · No. 16-16897 · Filed Jul 12, 2016 · Closed Jun 13, 2018
Role of Photo Stencil, LLC:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2018-06-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (llc); court in CO (not a filing state)
Leslie Leroy Stencil closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 10-25401 · Filed Mar 5, 2010 · Closed Jun 18, 2010
Role of Leslie Leroy Stencil:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2010-06-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (leroy); court in CA (not a filing state)
Repeat-O-Type Stencil Manufacturing Co. v. Napolitano closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 04-02160 · Filed Jun 30, 2004 · Closed Nov 27, 2006
Role of Repeat-O-Type Stencil Manufacturing Co.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-11-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (type); court in NJ (not a filing state)
House2home Inc v. Stencil Ease closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:04-ap-01105 · Filed Jan 20, 2004 · Closed Jan 6, 2005
Role of Stencil Ease:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2005-01-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Ideal Stencil Machine & Tape closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-92498 · Filed Oct 14, 2003 · Closed Mar 30, 2006
Role of Ideal Stencil Machine & Tape:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-03-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (ideal); court in NY (not a filing state)
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Midwest Stencil Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-91278 · Filed Oct 9, 2003 · Closed Aug 1, 2006
Role of Midwest Stencil Co.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-08-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (midwest); court in NY (not a filing state)
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of MCMS v. PHOTO STENCIL LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 03-55837 · Filed Sep 18, 2003 · Closed Mar 11, 2004
Role of PHOTO STENCIL LLC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2004-03-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (photo); court in DE (not a filing state)
Turoff v. United Stencil & Affixing Co. Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · No. 03-03165 · Filed Feb 3, 2003 · Closed Sep 8, 2003
Role of United Stencil & Affixing Co. Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2003-09-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
FirstMerit Bank NA v. Stencil closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 02-01216 · Filed Jun 10, 2002 · Closed Apr 7, 2003
Role of Stencil:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2003-04-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Stencil closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 01-01491 · Filed Dec 17, 2001 · Closed Jan 20, 2004
Role of Stencil:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2004-01-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Custom Stencil, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 00-57609 · Filed Nov 20, 2000 · Closed Mar 20, 2002
Role of Custom Stencil, Inc.:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2002-03-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in MI (not a filing state)
Repeat-O-Type Stencil Manufacturing Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 97-42935 · Filed Nov 5, 1997 · Closed Mar 9, 2000
Role of Repeat-O-Type Stencil Manufacturing Co.:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-03-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (type); court in NJ (not a filing state)
Freddie Stencil Smith and Annette Smith closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 1:97-bk-13036 · Filed May 14, 1997 · Closed Dec 1, 1997
Role of Freddie Stencil Smith and Annette Smith:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1997-12-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (freddie); court in OH (not a filing state)
Multi-Label And Stencil Co Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 94-11215 · Filed Jun 3, 1994 · Closed Nov 25, 1997
Role of Multi-Label And Stencil Co Inc:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1997-11-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Lloyd T.whitaker v. Stencil Systems Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:91-ap-00236 · Filed Oct 4, 1993 · Closed May 26, 1995
Role of Stencil Systems Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1995-05-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Whitaker v. Stencil Systems closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-28496 · Filed Dec 18, 1992 · Closed Jan 26, 1995
Role of Stencil Systems:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1995-01-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Whitaker v. Stencil Systems Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-26875 · Filed Oct 23, 1992 · Closed Apr 21, 1993
Role of Stencil Systems Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1993-04-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
Whitaker v. The Dayton Stencil Works Company closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-21044 · Filed Sep 24, 1992 · Closed Sep 27, 1993
Role of The Dayton Stencil Works Company:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1993-09-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (dayton); court in FL (not a filing state)
Whitaker v. Repeat-o-type Stencil Manufacturing Co closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-19014 · Filed Sep 14, 1992 · Closed Jun 26, 1996
Role of Repeat-o-type Stencil Manufacturing Co:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1996-06-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (type); court in FL (not a filing state)
Whitaker v. Ideal Stencil Machine And Tape Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-04729 · Filed Jun 2, 1992 · Closed Sep 19, 1997
Role of Ideal Stencil Machine And Tape Co.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1997-09-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); different first name (ideal); court in FL (not a filing state)
American Stencil Company, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 89-17111 · Filed Oct 11, 1989 · Closed May 14, 1993
Role of American Stencil Company, Inc.:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1993-05-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 26 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:40 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.