7 cases: 7 closed (disposition not in docket feed)
Gamble-Skogmo, Inc v. Kavanaugh closed
District Court, D. South Dakota · No. 4:84-cv-04022 · Filed Jan 31, 1984 · Closed Nov 30, 1984
Role of Gamble-Skogmo, Inc:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1984-11-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in SD (not a filing state)
GAMBLE-SKOGMO, INC. v. VOGLER, THOMAS L. closed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 3:83-cv-00043 · Filed Feb 23, 1983 · Closed Jul 12, 1983
Role of GAMBLE-SKOGMO, INC.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1983-07-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in IN (not a filing state)
Lenling v. Gambles-Skogmo, Inc. closed
District Court, D. South Dakota · No. 1:75-cv-01028 · Filed May 16, 1975 · Closed Nov 30, 1976
Role of Gambles-Skogmo, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1976-11-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in SD (not a filing state)
United States Department of Labor v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 1:73-cv-01211 · Filed Feb 12, 1973 · Closed Mar 25, 1974
Role of Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1974-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in ND (not a filing state)
S. v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 3:66-cv-04216 · Filed Jun 7, 1966 · Closed Jul 20, 1967
Role of Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1967-07-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in ND (not a filing state)
Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. closed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 9:64-cv-01253 · Filed Jun 11, 1964 · Closed Dec 31, 1964
Role of Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1964-12-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in NY (not a filing state)
Pfau v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. closed
District Court, D. North Dakota · No. 2:57-cv-03493 · Filed Apr 20, 1957 · Closed Jun 2, 1958
Role of Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1958-06-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 8 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in ND (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:31 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.