13 cases: 4 open, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 5 dismissed
Alter Trading Corporation v. Mervis Industries Inc open
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 2:26-cv-02183 · Filed Jun 16, 2026
Role of Mervis Industries Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Alter Trading Corporation v. Mervis Industries, Inc open
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 2:26-cv-02182 · Filed Jun 16, 2026
Role of Mervis Industries, Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
RMG Investment Group LLC v. Mervis Industries Inc open
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 2:26-cv-02158 · Filed May 27, 2026
Role of Mervis Industries Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
CLAYTON v. MERVIS DIAMOND CORPORATION open
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 1:25-cv-00226 · Filed Jul 23, 2025
Role of MERVIS DIAMOND CORPORATION:
Defendant · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in PA (not a filing state)
Mervis v. MGM International closed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 1:17-cv-02020 · Filed Sep 25, 2017 · Closed Oct 2, 2017
Role of Mervis:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2017-10-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Mervis v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc dismissed
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · No. 6:15-cv-00390 · Filed Feb 16, 2015 · Closed Jun 20, 2017 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Mervis:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2017-06-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
MERVIS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. dismissed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:09-cv-00633 · Filed May 21, 2009 · Closed Sep 1, 2010 ·
Nature of suit:
Environmental Matters
· Cause:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of MERVIS INDUSTRIES, INC.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2010-09-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (IN)
RIPBERGER v. MERVIS MOTORS, INC. dismissed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:05-cv-00189 · Filed Feb 4, 2005 · Closed May 9, 2006 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of MERVIS MOTORS, INC.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2006-05-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (IN)
Mervis Ind Inc v. Conrail, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 5:99-mc-00041 · Filed Jul 27, 1999 · Closed Jul 27, 1999
Role of Mervis Ind Inc:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-07-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Mervis Ind Inc v. Conrail, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 5:99-mc-00040 · Filed Jul 26, 1999 · Closed Jul 27, 1999
Role of Mervis Ind Inc:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-07-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Grabscheid v. Mervis Ind Inc dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:94-cv-02415 · Filed Apr 19, 1994 · Closed Nov 28, 1995 ·
Nature of suit:
422 Bankruptcy appeals rule 28 USC 158
Role of Mervis Ind Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1995-11-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
MERVIS STEEL DIV OF MERVIS INDUS v. G & B ERECTION COMPANY dismissed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:87-cv-00705 · Filed Jul 2, 1987 · Closed Feb 24, 1988 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of MERVIS STEEL DIV OF MERVIS INDUS:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-02-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (IN)
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION v. MERVIS SUPPLY CO., INC. closed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:86-cv-01349 · Filed Nov 18, 1986 · Closed Jun 11, 1987
Role of MERVIS SUPPLY CO., INC.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1987-06-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (4 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (IN)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:33 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.