11 cases: 1 open, 5 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 4 dismissed, 1 judgment
Tunick v. Takara Sake USA Inc. open
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:23-cv-00572 · Filed Feb 8, 2023 ·
Nature of suit:
Other Fraud
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Role of Tunick:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Pending — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Tunick v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:12-cv-01757 · Filed Jul 17, 2012 · Closed Aug 28, 2012 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Tunick:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2012-08-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Dynacorp Financial v. Tunick dismissed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 0:97-cv-07352 · Filed Nov 4, 1997 · Closed Sep 27, 2000 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Tunick:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2000-09-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
National Union Fire v. Tunick closed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:93-cv-01313 · Filed Jul 9, 1993 · Closed Nov 29, 1993
Role of Tunick:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-11-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE v. TUNICK closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. · Filed Mar 12, 1993 · Closed Jan 16, 1997 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of TUNICK:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1997-01-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
National Union Fire v. Tunick closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:93-cv-01559 · Filed Mar 12, 1993 · Closed Sep 15, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Tunick:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-09-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
David Tunick, Inc. v. Kornfeld dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:91-cv-07027 · Filed Oct 17, 1991 · Closed Feb 7, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
370 Other fraud
Role of David Tunick, Inc.:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-02-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in NY (not a filing state)
IN THE MATTER OF v. THEOFORE TUNICK AND CO OTD dismissed
District Court, Virgin Islands · No. · Filed Jul 2, 1990 · Closed Nov 30, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
990 Other
Role of v. THEOFORE TUNICK AND CO OTD:
Party · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-11-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); different first name (theofore); court in VI (not a filing state)
National Union Fire v. Tunick closed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 0:88-cv-06209 · Filed Mar 22, 1988 · Closed Mar 22, 1988
Role of Tunick:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-03-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in FL (not a filing state)
NATL UN FR INS CO v. TUNICK judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. · Filed Mar 9, 1987 · Closed Dec 31, 1987 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of TUNICK:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1987-12-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
ARMATA INC v. TUNICK PROD CO INC dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. · Filed Nov 19, 1986 · Closed Aug 2, 1989 ·
Nature of suit:
891 Agricultural acts
Role of TUNICK PROD CO INC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1989-08-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: lack of jurisdiction Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 27 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts; live RECAP re-check pending. State courts: not yet searched. PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:34 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not yet searched. No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.