12 cases: 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 open, 6 dismissed, 1 judgment
UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION v. MICHAEL D. LANSKY, LLC closed
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:23-mc-00103 · Filed Oct 12, 2023 · Closed Dec 4, 2023
Role of MICHAEL D. LANSKY, LLC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2023-12-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); different first name (llc); court in DC (not a filing state)
Arizona, State of v. Michael D Lansky LLC open
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 4:23-cv-00233 · Filed May 23, 2023 ·
Nature of suit:
485 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
· Cause:
47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Role of Michael D Lansky LLC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); different first name (michael); court in AZ (not a filing state)
Michael D. Lansky, LLC v. TransNexus, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:22-cv-04829 · Filed Dec 7, 2022 · Closed Nov 13, 2023
Role of Michael D. Lansky, LLC:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2023-11-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); different first name (llc); court in GA (not a filing state)
Lansky v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation closed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:20-cv-11878 · Filed Oct 19, 2020 · Closed Dec 7, 2022
Role of Lansky:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2022-12-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MA (not a filing state)
Lansky v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:20-cv-05196 · Filed Sep 2, 2020 · Closed Oct 19, 2020
Role of Lansky:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2020-10-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Lansky v. Janssen Research & Development LLC dismissed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:19-cv-00353 · Filed Jan 17, 2019 · Closed Dec 14, 2020 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Lansky:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2020-12-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Lansky v. Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 2:17-cv-02883 · Filed Dec 8, 2017 · Closed Feb 12, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
385 Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
· Cause:
28:1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Role of Lansky:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-02-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Lansky v. Merck & Co., Inc. dismissed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:14-cv-02313 · Filed Apr 10, 2014 · Closed Aug 3, 2017 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Lansky:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2017-08-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
Vandoulakis v. Lansky's Operating Corporation judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:13-cv-04281 · Filed Jun 20, 2013 · Closed May 18, 2015 ·
Nature of suit:
891 Agriculture Acts
· Cause:
07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Role of Lansky's Operating Corporation:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2015-05-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
AT&T, Inc. v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Ellis, Roeder and Lazar, P C dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:10-cv-11070 · Filed Mar 16, 2010 · Closed Aug 24, 2010 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Contract: Other
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Role of Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Ellis, Roeder and Lazar, P C:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2010-08-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); different first name (couzens); court in MI (not a filing state)
LANSKY v. REGAL INTERNATIONAL dismissed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:93-cv-00852 · Filed Feb 18, 1993 · Closed May 11, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of LANSKY:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-05-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in PA (not a filing state)
LANSKY, IRVIN v. EXXON CORPORATION dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. · Filed Apr 18, 1989 · Closed May 16, 1991 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of LANSKY, IRVIN:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1991-05-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (5 people in Form D filings, 22 federal dockets); different first name (irvin); court in TN (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.