8 cases: 8 closed (disposition not in docket feed)
Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A. v. Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 07-01731 · Filed Jun 14, 2007 · Closed Jul 7, 2009
Role of Tenner:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2009-07-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (NY)
Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Ruth Tenner, Of The Samuel closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · No. 98-58913 · Filed Mar 26, 1998 · Closed Aug 15, 2000
Role of Ruth Tenner, Of The Samuel:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-08-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); different first name (of); court in the person's filing state (NY)
Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · No. 98-53942 · Filed Mar 26, 1998 · Closed Jun 22, 2000
Role of Tenner:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-06-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (NY)
Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · No. 98-51256 · Filed Mar 25, 1998 · Closed Mar 31, 2000
Role of Tenner:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-03-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (NY)
Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · No. 98-50850 · Filed Mar 25, 1998 · Closed Mar 22, 2000
Role of Tenner:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-03-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (NY)
Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · No. 98-42105 · Filed Feb 20, 1998 · Closed Feb 2, 2001
Role of Tenner:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2001-02-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (NY)
James Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:91-bk-42546 · Filed Oct 16, 1991 · Closed May 30, 1995
Role of James Tenner:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1995-05-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); first name matches; court in AR (not a filing state)
James Tenner closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:86-bk-42121 · Filed Dec 12, 1986 · Closed Nov 13, 1991
Role of James Tenner:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1991-11-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 35 federal dockets); first name matches; court in AR (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:47 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.