PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:29 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Person

GS
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)

GREG SYRUP

Named as an officer, director or promoter on SEC Form D filings · ND · Jan 13, 2016 → Nov 4, 2024

2deals (issuers)
$910Kreported sold
8investors
4Form D filings
2016–2024years on file

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:36 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

GREG SYRUP is listed as an executive officer on 4 SEC Form D filings by 2 issuers between Jan 2016 and Nov 2024: 701 Angel Fund, LP (Grand Forks, ND — pooled investment fund — 2016–2017; $910K reported sold to 8 investors) and 701 Fund 3 LLLP (Grand Forks, ND — pooled investment fund — 2024).

What this means 2 separate companies raised money with this person listed as executive officer, over about 8 years. Across those companies the filings report $910K sold in total.

Listed alongside 701 VENTURES (2 shared filings, management entity), HEATHER MCDOUGALL (2 shared filings) and TODD PRINGLE (2 shared filings).

What this means These are the other officers, directors or promoters the companies named on the same forms — the team around GREG. Each name links to their own page.

All 2 issuers belong to the sponsor group 701 Angel (2 issuers, $910K reported sold, 2016–2024).

What this means A sponsor group is one team that sets up a new company for each deal. 701 Angel has 2 companies on file and $910K reported sold in total — the group page shows the whole track record in one place.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA) — 14 court cases matching the name, 10 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 24 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 4 public filings for GREG SYRUP and found 3 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 495 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for GREG SYRUP has not run yet — it is joining a line of 17,520 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

14 cases: 1 open, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 6 dismissed, 3 judgment

Garofalo v. Maple Syrup, LLC open
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:25-cv-02215 · Filed Oct 29, 2025
Role of Maple Syrup, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (llc); court in LA (not a filing state)
Doherty Restaurant Group LLC v. Syrup LLC closed
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 5:25-cv-00218 · Filed Feb 19, 2025 · Closed Mar 18, 2025
Role of Syrup LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2025-03-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OK (not a filing state)
Syrup Associates, Inc. v. Coastal Development Massachusetts, LLC dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:18-cv-08133 · Filed Sep 6, 2018 · Closed Jul 9, 2019 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Syrup Associates, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2019-07-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
Western Syrup Co v. American West B M D dismissed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:96-cv-03470 · Filed May 15, 1996 · Closed Oct 3, 1996 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Western Syrup Co: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1996-10-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (western); court in CA (not a filing state)
Vineland Syrup Inc v. Cargill Inc judgment
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 1:95-cv-01385 · Filed Oct 2, 1995 · Closed Sep 26, 2002 · Nature of suit: 410 Anti-Trust · Cause: 28:1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Role of Vineland Syrup Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2002-09-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (vineland); court in IL (not a filing state)
VINELAND SYRUP INC v. CARGILL INC, ET AL closed
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. · Filed Oct 2, 1995 · Closed Sep 13, 2001 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of VINELAND SYRUP INC: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-09-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (vineland); court in IL (not a filing state)
Vineland Syrup Inc v. Archer Daniels dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:95-cv-05071 · Filed Sep 5, 1995 · Closed Sep 28, 1995 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of Vineland Syrup Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1995-09-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (vineland); court in IL (not a filing state)
United States v. Syrup Mill Partners judgment
District Court, D. South Carolina · No. 3:95-cv-00263 · Filed Feb 28, 1995 · Closed Apr 18, 1995 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental matters
Role of Syrup Mill Partners: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1995-04-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in SC (not a filing state)
Vineland Syrup, Inc. v. BOC Group dismissed
District Court, M.D. Florida · No. 6:92-cv-00767 · Filed Oct 6, 1992 · Closed Apr 11, 1996 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of Vineland Syrup, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1996-04-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in FL (not a filing state)
VINELAND SYRUP, INC. v. BOC GROUP. INC. closed
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:92-cv-01800 · Filed Apr 29, 1992 · Closed Sep 17, 1992 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of VINELAND SYRUP, INC.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1992-09-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (inc); court in NJ (not a filing state)
Kraft General Foods v. Phillips Syrup Corp. closed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 1:90-mc-00430 · Filed Jun 14, 1990 · Closed Jun 14, 1990
Role of Phillips Syrup Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1990-06-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (phillips); court in OH (not a filing state)
Retail Wholesale Pen v. NY Syrup Corp dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:89-cv-07076 · Filed Oct 24, 1989 · Closed Jan 3, 1990 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of NY Syrup Corp: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1990-01-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (ny); court in NY (not a filing state)
MILLER ETAL v. CONSOL SYRUP CO dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. · Filed Jan 8, 1988 · Closed Aug 15, 1988 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of CONSOL SYRUP CO: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1988-08-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (consol); court in NY (not a filing state)
Cleveland Syrup Corporation v. L.F. Rothchild, Unterberg, Towbin, Inc. judgment
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 1:87-cv-02481 · Filed Sep 23, 1987 · Closed Jun 13, 1988 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Cleveland Syrup Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1988-06-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for both plaintiff and defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (cleveland); court in OH (not a filing state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:36 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched GREG SYRUP..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

10 cases: 10 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

AW Liquidation, Inc. (f/k/a Associated Wholesalers v. Citadelle Maple Syrup Producers' Cooperative closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 16-51326 · Filed Sep 8, 2016 · Closed Oct 13, 2016
Role of Citadelle Maple Syrup Producers' Cooperative: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2016-10-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (maple); court in DE (not a filing state)
GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as Liqui v. Syrup Systems, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · No. 08-07087 · Filed Sep 10, 2008 · Closed Nov 3, 2009
Role of Syrup Systems, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2009-11-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
PCT v. C. S. Steen Syrup Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 05-76552 · Filed Mar 22, 2005 · Closed Nov 28, 2005
Role of C. S. Steen Syrup Co.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2005-11-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (steen); court in DE (not a filing state)
PCT v. T. J. Blackburn Syrup Works, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 05-76791 · Filed Mar 22, 2005 · Closed Jan 11, 2006
Role of T. J. Blackburn Syrup Works, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2006-01-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (blackburn); court in DE (not a filing state)
C.S. Steen Syrup Mill, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · No. 04-52189 · Filed Sep 3, 2004 · Closed Feb 24, 2006
Role of C.S. Steen Syrup Mill, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2006-02-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (steen); court in LA (not a filing state)
Bill's Dollar Stores, Inc. v. TJ Blackburns Syrup closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 03-50782 · Filed Feb 13, 2003 · Closed Jan 11, 2005
Role of TJ Blackburns Syrup: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2005-01-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (blackburns); court in DE (not a filing state)
AFD FUND v. T.J. BLACKBURN SYRUP WORKS, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-07641 · Filed Oct 12, 2001 · Closed Jan 24, 2002
Role of T.J. BLACKBURN SYRUP WORKS, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2002-01-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (blackburn); court in DE (not a filing state)
Independent Syrup Co., Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 96-36897 · Filed Aug 8, 1996 · Closed Jan 7, 2000
Role of Independent Syrup Co., Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2000-01-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (independent); court in NJ (not a filing state)
Adams Syrup Co., Inc. v. Randall closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · No. 95-01678 · Filed Nov 2, 1995 · Closed Feb 14, 2000
Role of Adams Syrup Co., Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 2000-02-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (adams); court in CO (not a filing state)
Jay Syrup Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 94-28093 · Filed Nov 22, 1994 · Closed Apr 25, 1996
Role of Jay Syrup Co.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1996-04-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same rare surname (2 people in Form D filings, 31 federal dockets); different first name (jay); court in NJ (not a filing state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:36 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

Comparisons cover issuers and sponsor groups — see the issuer pages under Deals

3 differences found between the filings for GREG SYRUP — 1 worth asking about (compared 4 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Dec 30, 2015 – May 8, 2017

Form D filed 495 days after the first sale — 701 Angel Fund, LP

The filing says the first sale was Dec 30, 2015. The Form D was filed May 8, 2017 — 495 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 480 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Dec 30, 2015 – May 8, 2017

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — 701 Angel Fund, LP (latest filing May 8, 2017)

The latest filing for this offering is dated May 8, 2017 (first sale Dec 30, 2015). It reports $910,000 sold of $5,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Dec 30, 2015 – Jan 13, 2016

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — 701 Angel Fund, LP (latest filing Jan 13, 2016)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jan 13, 2016 (first sale Dec 30, 2015). It reports $500,000 sold of $5,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 3 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Nov 4, 2024 D/A
701 Fund 3 LLLP
File 021-517552
$0$0$0
General Partners receive 2.25% in aggregate of the total capital commitments of the Issuer on an annual business during the investment period
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 8, 2017 D
701 Angel Fund, LP
File 021-286207
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 13, 2016 D
701 Angel Fund, LP
File 021-255075
$0$0$0
General Partner receives 2.25% of the total capital commitments of the issuer on an annual basis.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across every filing this person is listed on (latest filing per offering, per issuer).

Deals 2

Every issuer that named Greg Syrup on a Form D, newest first. A Form D is the notice a company files after it starts selling a private investment.

Pooled Investment Fund · group: 701 Angel

701 Fund 3 LLLP

Grand Forks, ND · Jul 2, 2024 → Nov 4, 2024 · 2 filings
  • Nov 4, 2024 · D/A · $0 sold of $15,000,000 · 0 investors · min. $25,000 · role: Executive Officer (PRINCIPAL OF THE GENERAL PARTNER) EDGAR ↗
  • Jul 2, 2024 · D · $0 sold of $15,000,000 · 0 investors · min. $25,000 · role: Executive Officer (PRINCIPAL OF THE GENERAL PARTNER) EDGAR ↗

No sales reported yet as of the latest filing. Greg is listed as executive officer on 2 filings for this deal.

Sources

Every row is a Form D or D/A on which the issuer listed this name as a related person. Amount sold and investors are the maximum reported on any filing for this issuer. "Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(c) (8,096 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Pooled Investment Fund · group: 701 Angel

701 Angel Fund, LP

Grand Forks, ND · Jan 13, 2016 → May 8, 2017 · 2 filings
  • May 8, 2017 · D · $910,000 sold of $5,000,000 · 8 investors · min. $50,000 · role: Executive Officer EDGAR ↗
  • Jan 13, 2016 · D · $500,000 sold of $5,000,000 · 8 investors · min. $50,000 · role: Executive Officer (Principal of General Partner) EDGAR ↗

Raised $910K from 8 investors (18% of the $5M target) as of the latest filing. Greg is listed as executive officer on 2 filings for this deal.

Sources

Every row is a Form D or D/A on which the issuer listed this name as a related person. Amount sold and investors are the maximum reported on any filing for this issuer. "Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

People around Greg 3

Officers, directors, promoters and management entities named on the same filings, as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET.

Management entity

701 VENTURES

Promoter · 2 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Greg Syrup. Their page shows their other deals.

HM
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

HEATHER MCDOUGALL

Executive Officer, Promoter · 2 shared filings (1 issuer) · also on 1 other issuer

Listed on the same filings as Greg Syrup. Their page shows their other deals.

TP
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

TODD PRINGLE

Executive Officer · 2 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Greg Syrup. Their page shows their other deals.

The team behind the deals

Sponsor group

701 Angel

2 issuers · 4 filings · $910K reported sold · 2016–2024

One team, 2 deal companies. Greg Syrup is listed on 2 of them.

Sources

Issuers are grouped when their Form D filings share related persons, a management entity or a business address (automatic match from the filings). "Listed" marks the issuers that name GREG SYRUP.

Same business address

8 other issuers file from the same address

A shared address can mean the same team, a shared office building or a registered agent. It is a lead, not a conclusion.

Registrations and other filings

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

None of the 2 issuers this person is listed on appears in Form ADV (searched 24,962 advisers as of Oct 2, 2026). A person is never an adviser firm; Form ADV is checked for the issuers and the management companies they are listed with.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Property records none — individuals are not matched

Property records are matched to companies only, never to individuals, so none are matched to GREG SYRUP by design. Searched property records in Hillsborough County FL (Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026 + FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Harris County TX (HCAD 2026 ownership roll), Dallas County TX (DCAD 2026 ownership roll), New York City ACRIS documents and PLUTO ownership rows already retrieved for other issuers, Cook County IL sale and ownership rows already retrieved for other issuers (814,874 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET) for the 2 issuers this person is listed on — nothing matched.

Public profiles and social

Websites and social links of the issuers Greg Syrup is listed on: none on file. No website or social profile named in 701 Angel Fund, LP's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #272,848 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (Grand Forks, ND). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Every fact links to its public-record source. Plain-English notes next to a fact are our reading of that fact, not a rating. Request a correction · Facts policy

Request a correction

Free. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Add a response

If this is you or your firm, add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Monitor this person

Members get an email when GREG SYRUP appears on a new Form D, or when a court case or SEC action is matched to them. See plans →