8 cases: 8 closed (disposition not in docket feed)
Yalda Moshiri closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 18-52124 · Filed Sep 19, 2018 · Closed Dec 27, 2018
Role of Yalda Moshiri:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2018-12-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); different first name (yalda); court in CA (not a filing state)
BROADWAY TIFFANY, LLC v. Moshiri closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 17-00291 · Filed May 15, 2017 · Closed Oct 13, 2017
Role of Moshiri:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2017-10-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IL (not a filing state)
Ebrahim Moshiri closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 1:09-bk-26762 · Filed Dec 11, 2009 · Closed Jan 22, 2016
Role of Ebrahim Moshiri:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2016-01-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); first name matches; court in CA (not a filing state)
Cheryl Renee Smith and Moshiri Felleman Smith closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · No. 09-41981 · Filed Nov 24, 2009 · Closed Oct 31, 2014
Role of Cheryl Renee Smith and Moshiri Felleman Smith:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2014-10-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in KS (not a filing state)
Ali A Moshiri-Azad closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · No. 09-30803 · Filed Sep 29, 2009 · Closed Aug 7, 2012
Role of Ali A Moshiri-Azad:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2012-08-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); different first name (ali); court in FL (not a filing state)
Chase Bank USA, NA v. Moshiri closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · No. 06-04053 · Filed Feb 20, 2006 · Closed Oct 12, 2006
Role of Moshiri:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2006-10-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Moshiri Fe-lleman Smith and Candace La'Mire Smith closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · No. 97-41597 · Filed Jun 11, 1997 · Closed Aug 3, 2001
Role of Moshiri Fe-lleman Smith and Candace La'Mire Smith:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2001-08-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in KS (not a filing state)
Ali A. Moshiri-Azad closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 92-15617 · Filed Nov 30, 1992 · Closed Apr 9, 1993
Role of Ali A. Moshiri-Azad:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1993-04-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 16 federal dockets); different first name (ali); court in VA (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:18 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.