13 cases: 1 open, 10 dismissed, 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 judgment
Bateson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. open
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:19-cv-02675 · Filed Mar 21, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Bateson:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Cleveland Constr Inc v. Bateson Dailey dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:97-cv-70409 · Filed Jan 31, 1997 · Closed Feb 19, 1998 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson Dailey:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1998-02-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Fischbach Moore Inc v. Bateson-Dailey dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:96-cv-74356 · Filed Sep 18, 1996 · Closed Apr 8, 1997 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson-Dailey:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1997-04-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Aviall Services Inc v. Bateson dismissed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:96-cv-02639 · Filed Sep 18, 1996 · Closed Mar 13, 1997 ·
Nature of suit:
893 Environmental matters
Role of Bateson:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1997-03-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Colasanti Corp v. Bateson-Dailey dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:95-cv-73650 · Filed Sep 11, 1995 · Closed Nov 29, 1995 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson-Dailey:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1995-11-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Price Bros Co v. Bateson-Dailey dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:94-cv-70350 · Filed Jan 28, 1994 · Closed Jun 24, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson-Dailey:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-06-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Palmer Equip Co v. Bateson/Dailey Jt dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:93-cv-75290 · Filed Dec 20, 1993 · Closed Mar 11, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Bateson/Dailey Jt:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-03-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
MI Tractor Mach Co v. Bateson Dailey dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:93-cv-74779 · Filed Nov 10, 1993 · Closed Jan 7, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson Dailey:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-01-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Depco Equip Co v. Bateson-Dailey dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:93-cv-74148 · Filed Oct 1, 1993 · Closed Dec 9, 1993 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson-Dailey:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-12-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Joseph Shisko, Inc. v. Bateson Bonding closed
District Court, S.D. Georgia · No. 1:91-cv-00232 · Filed Nov 1, 1991 · Closed May 17, 1993
Role of Bateson Bonding:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1993-05-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
Joseph Shisko Inc v. Bateson Bonding Co dismissed
District Court, D. South Carolina · No. 2:91-cv-03121 · Filed Oct 15, 1991 · Closed Jan 2, 1992 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of Bateson Bonding Co:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-01-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in SC (not a filing state)
U S v. BATESON CO INC judgment
District Court, D. New Mexico · No. · Filed Mar 10, 1987 · Closed May 4, 1989 ·
Nature of suit:
130 Miller act
Role of BATESON CO INC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1989-05-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for both plaintiff and defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NM (not a filing state)
Xyovest, Inc. v. Bateson dismissed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:85-cv-04143 · Filed Oct 4, 1985 · Closed Jun 29, 1988 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Bateson:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-06-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in GA (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:42 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.