8 cases: 2 open, 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 3 dismissed
Manser v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. open
District Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 4:25-cv-01598 · Filed Oct 28, 2025
Role of Manser:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Manser v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. closed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:24-cv-12559 · Filed Sep 27, 2024 · Closed Mar 12, 2025
Role of Manser:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2025-03-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
Manser v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC closed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:23-cv-02267 · Filed Jun 20, 2023 · Closed May 30, 2024
Role of Manser:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2024-05-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
MANSER v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD. open
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 1:21-cv-18420 · Filed Oct 12, 2021
Role of MANSER:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NJ (not a filing state)
Manser v. FCA US LLC closed
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 5:21-cv-00519 · Filed May 19, 2021 · Closed Mar 22, 2022
Role of Manser:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2022-03-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OK (not a filing state)
Union Electric Company v. Manser dismissed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 2:06-cv-04021 · Filed Feb 1, 2006 · Closed Apr 25, 2006 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other statutory actions
Role of Manser:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2006-04-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MO (not a filing state)
Manser v. Penncro Associates dismissed
District Court, N.D. New York · No. 5:99-cv-01504 · Filed Sep 20, 1999 · Closed Nov 12, 1999 ·
Nature of suit:
450 Interstate commerce
Role of Manser:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1999-11-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
MANSER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP dismissed
District Court, N.D. New York · No. · Filed Sep 26, 1984 · Closed Feb 10, 1988 ·
Nature of suit:
330 Federal employers' liability
Role of MANSER:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1988-02-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: lack of jurisdiction Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 19 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in NY (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:59 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.