15 cases: 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 open, 8 dismissed, 2 judgment
Blasingame v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:23-cv-00264 · Filed Jan 18, 2023 · Closed Jan 18, 2023
Role of Blasingame:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2023-01-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in the person's filing state (GA)
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Blasingame closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:21-cv-01552 · Filed Mar 4, 2021 · Closed May 25, 2021
Role of Blasingame:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-05-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in CA (not a filing state)
Blasingame v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc closed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 4:20-cv-12558 · Filed Sep 18, 2020 · Closed Jan 4, 2021
Role of Blasingame:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2021-01-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
BLASINGAME v. COOK INCORPORATED open
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:19-cv-04783 · Filed Dec 4, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of BLASINGAME:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in IN (not a filing state)
Church Joint Venture, a limited partnership v. Blasingame dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 1:18-cv-01118 · Filed Jul 6, 2018 · Closed Jul 8, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Role of Blasingame:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-07-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Church Joint Venture, a limited partnership v. Blasingame dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 1:18-cv-01116 · Filed Jul 6, 2018 · Closed May 14, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Role of Blasingame:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-05-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Church Joint Venture, a limited partnership v. Blasingame dismissed
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 1:18-cv-01115 · Filed Jul 3, 2018 · Closed May 14, 2019 ·
Nature of suit:
Other Statutory Actions
· Cause:
28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Role of Blasingame:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2019-05-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
Blasingame v. Janssen Research & Development LLC dismissed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:15-cv-05540 · Filed Oct 29, 2015 · Closed Mar 6, 2020 ·
Nature of suit:
367 Health care / pharm
Role of Blasingame:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2020-03-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in LA (not a filing state)
Blasingame v. Couch, Conville & Blitt, LLC dismissed
District Court, W.D. Texas · No. 5:15-cv-00709 · Filed Aug 20, 2015 · Closed Dec 23, 2015 ·
Nature of suit:
480 Consumer credit
Role of Blasingame:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2015-12-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Blasingame v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Incorporated dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:08-cv-12661 · Filed Jul 2, 2008 · Closed Sep 8, 2017 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of Blasingame:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2017-09-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in MI (not a filing state)
BLASINGAME v. REDDY ICE HOLDINGS INC, ET AL closed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. · Filed Mar 21, 2008 · Closed Jun 26, 2008 ·
Nature of suit:
410 Antitrust
Role of BLASINGAME:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 2008-06-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. v. Blasingame dismissed
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 3:03-cv-07708 · Filed Nov 26, 2003 · Closed Nov 29, 2004 ·
Nature of suit:
890 Other statutory actions
Role of Blasingame:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 2004-11-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in OH (not a filing state)
Blasingame v. Sheats/Frazier Inc dismissed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:93-cv-03455 · Filed Oct 29, 1993 · Closed Feb 2, 1994 ·
Nature of suit:
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Blasingame:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Terminated 1994-02-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TX (not a filing state)
Park Bank v. Blasingame judgment
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 1:92-cv-01194 · Filed Oct 1, 1992 · Closed Dec 31, 1992 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of Blasingame:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1992-12-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
ROAD BUILDERS EQUIP v. BLASINGAME judgment
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. · Filed Feb 23, 1984 · Closed Aug 17, 1989 ·
Nature of suit:
190 Other contract actions
Role of BLASINGAME:
Defendant · Outcome:
Terminated 1989-08-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on court trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗same rare surname (3 people in Form D filings, 54 federal dockets); surname only in the caption; court in TN (not a filing state)
What was searched
Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:47 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.