PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:29 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Person

AC
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)

Amit Chatterjee

Named as an officer, director or promoter on SEC Form D filings · CA · May 15, 2009 → Sep 23, 2013

2deals (issuers)
$15.8Mreported sold
24investors
3Form D filings
2009–2013years on file

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:18 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Amit Chatterjee is listed as an executive officer and director on 3 SEC Form D filings by 2 issuers between May 2009 and Sep 2013: HARA SOFTWARE, INC. (Redwood City, CA — other technology — 2009; $14M reported sold to 5 investors) and Leap Commerce Inc. (San Carlos, CA — computers — 2013; $1.84M reported sold to 19 investors).

What this means 2 separate companies raised money with this person listed as executive officer and director, over about 4 years. Across those companies the filings report $15.8M sold in total.

Listed alongside Ajit Nazre (2 shared filings), Jay Fulcher (2 shared filings), Ted Schlein (2 shared filings), Karel Baloun (1 shared filing), Ted Siboni (1 shared filing) and 1 others.

What this means These are the other officers, directors or promoters the companies named on the same forms — the team around Amit. Each name links to their own page.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA) — 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 1 record came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 3 public filings for Amit Chatterjee and found 7 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 479 days after the first sale; Form D filed 346 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Amit Chatterjee has not run yet — it is joining a line of 17,618 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

None found in sources searched — federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:18 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Amit Chatterjee..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Amit Chatterjee closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 11-16531 · Filed Jul 8, 2011 · Closed Dec 8, 2011
Role of Amit Chatterjee: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2011-12-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
same full name (rare in federal dockets); court in MA (not a filing state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:18 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

Comparisons cover issuers and sponsor groups — see the issuer pages under Deals

7 differences found between the filings for Amit Chatterjee — 2 worth asking about (compared 3 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jun 1, 2012 – Sep 23, 2013

Form D filed 479 days after the first sale — Leap Commerce Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Jun 1, 2012. The Form D was filed Sep 23, 2013 — 479 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 464 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · Jun 3, 2008 – May 15, 2009

Form D filed 346 days after the first sale — HARA SOFTWARE, INC.

The filing says the first sale was Jun 3, 2008. The Form D was filed May 15, 2009 — 346 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 331 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Aug 27, 2009 – Sep 23, 2009

Form D filed 27 days after the first sale — HARA SOFTWARE, INC.

The filing says the first sale was Aug 27, 2009. The Form D was filed Sep 23, 2009 — 27 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 12 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · May 15, 2009 – Sep 23, 2009

Offering amount changed between filings — HARA SOFTWARE, INC.

The May 15, 2009 filing says $6,000,000 offered; the Sep 23, 2009 Form D says $15,000,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Jun 1, 2012 – Sep 23, 2013

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Leap Commerce Inc. (latest filing Sep 23, 2013)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Sep 23, 2013 (first sale Jun 1, 2012). It reports $1,841,902 sold of $2,447,500 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jun 3, 2008 – Sep 23, 2009

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — HARA SOFTWARE, INC. (latest filing Sep 23, 2009)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Sep 23, 2009 (first sale Jun 3, 2008). It reports $14,000,000 sold of $15,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · May 15, 2009 – Sep 23, 2009

Address moved from Menlo Park, CA to Redwood City, CA — HARA SOFTWARE, INC.

The people listed on the May 15, 2009 filing give Menlo Park, CA; on the Sep 23, 2009 filing they give Redwood City, CA. The address now on file (2055 Woodside Road, Ste. 200, Redwood City, CA) is a registered-agent or shared-office address used by 7 issuers.

What this means A registered agent's address is a mailbox, not where the team works. Ask where the business actually operates.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 2 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Sep 23, 2013 D
Leap Commerce Inc.
File 021-203374
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 23, 2009 D
HARA SOFTWARE, INC.
File 021-131280
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across every filing this person is listed on (latest filing per offering, per issuer).

Deals 2

Every issuer that named Amit Chatterjee on a Form D, newest first. A Form D is the notice a company files after it starts selling a private investment.

Computers

Leap Commerce Inc.

San Carlos, CA · Sep 23, 2013
  • Sep 23, 2013 · D · $1,841,902 sold of $2,447,500 · 19 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Executive Officer, Director EDGAR ↗

Raised $1.84M from 19 investors (75% of the $2.45M target) as of the latest filing. Amit is listed as executive officer, director.

Sources

Every row is a Form D or D/A on which the issuer listed this name as a related person. Amount sold and investors are the maximum reported on any filing for this issuer. "Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Computers / 506(b) (499 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Other Technology

HARA SOFTWARE, INC.

Redwood City, CA · May 15, 2009 → Sep 23, 2009 · 2 filings
  • Sep 23, 2009 · D · $14,000,000 sold of $15,000,000 · 5 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Executive Officer, Director EDGAR ↗
  • May 15, 2009 · D · $2,500,000 sold of $6,000,000 · 1 investors · min. No minimum reported · role: Executive Officer, Director EDGAR ↗

Raised $14M from 5 investors (93% of the $15M target) as of the latest filing. Amit is listed as executive officer, director on 2 filings for this deal.

Sources

Every row is a Form D or D/A on which the issuer listed this name as a related person. Amount sold and investors are the maximum reported on any filing for this issuer.

People around Amit 6

Officers, directors, promoters and management entities named on the same filings, as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET.

JF
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Jay Fulcher

Director · 2 shared filings (1 issuer) · also on 5 other issuers

Jay Fulcher is on 6 issuers in total — a repeat sponsor. Their page lists every one.

AN
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Ajit Nazre

Director · 2 shared filings (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Chatterjee. Their page shows their other deals.

TS
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Ted Schlein

Director · 2 shared filings (1 issuer) · also on 14 other issuers

Ted Schlein is on 15 issuers in total — a repeat sponsor. Their page lists every one.

TS
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Ted Siboni

Director · 1 shared filing (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Chatterjee. Their page shows their other deals.

TM
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Tom Mawhinney

Director · 1 shared filing (1 issuer) · also on 5 other issuers

Tom Mawhinney is on 6 issuers in total — a repeat sponsor. Their page lists every one.

KB
No photo found yet (own website and image search run after this page is viewed)
Person

Karel Baloun

Executive Officer · 1 shared filing (1 issuer)

Listed on the same filings as Amit Chatterjee. Their page shows their other deals.

The team behind the deals

Registrations and other filings

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

None of the 2 issuers this person is listed on appears in Form ADV (searched 24,962 advisers as of Oct 2, 2026). A person is never an adviser firm; Form ADV is checked for the issuers and the management companies they are listed with.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Property records none — individuals are not matched

Property records are matched to companies only, never to individuals, so none are matched to Amit Chatterjee by design. Searched property records in Hillsborough County FL (Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026 + FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Harris County TX (HCAD 2026 ownership roll), Dallas County TX (DCAD 2026 ownership roll), New York City ACRIS documents and PLUTO ownership rows already retrieved for other issuers, Cook County IL sale and ownership rows already retrieved for other issuers (814,874 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET) for the 2 issuers this person is listed on — nothing matched.

Public profiles and social

Websites and social links of the issuers Amit Chatterjee is listed on: none on file. No website or social profile named in HARA SOFTWARE, INC.'s SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #369,283 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (Redwood City, CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Every fact links to its public-record source. Plain-English notes next to a fact are our reading of that fact, not a rating. Request a correction · Facts policy

Request a correction

Free. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Add a response

If this is you or your firm, add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Monitor this person

Members get an email when Amit Chatterjee appears on a new Form D, or when a court case or SEC action is matched to them. See plans →