PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 10:13 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

Z

Zmc

One sponsor team, 9 deal companies · New York, NY

Grouped because: 12 shared people, 2 shared management entities, same business address (8 issuers), similar issuer names (7) · 2 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

9deal companies
$1.89Breported sold
195investors
15Form D filings
2010–2024active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 13, 2024 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:14 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Zmc is a sponsor group of 9 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names, shared management entity; automatic match from the filings), filing 15 Form D filings between Nov 2010 and Mar 2024.

What this means One team, 9 deal companies, about 14 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.89B to 195 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (6), "Other" (3). Issuers are based in NY (9).

What this means $1.89B raised across the group, about $9.7M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Strauss Zelnick (9 issuers, executive officer and director), Andrew Vogel (8 issuers, executive officer and director), Jordan Turkewitz (8 issuers, executive officer and director), Karl Slatoff (7 issuers, executive officer), Seymour Sammell (6 issuers, executive officer) and 23 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 13, 2024.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 37 court cases matching the name, 2 SEC releases, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 41 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 15 public filings for Zmc and found 12 differences, 5 worth asking the sponsor about: Regulator action naming a team member: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (Apr 1, 2009); Regulator action naming a team member: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Ryan Brant, Larry Muller, James David, Jr. (Jun 9, 2005); and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Zmc has not run yet — it is joining a line of 49,499 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 641 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: Bing (site:reddit.com / site:biggerpockets.com) and Reddit's own search, plus DuckDuckGo/Brave/BiggerPockets search when they are answering.

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

37 cases: 12 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 open, 15 dismissed, 9 judgment

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:26-mc-00425 · Filed Aug 21, 2026 · Closed Aug 31, 2026 · Cause: M 08-86 Internet Infringement
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2026-08-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. open
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:26-mc-00426 · Filed Aug 21, 2026 · Cause: M 08-86 Internet Infringement
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
In RE: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:26-mc-00422 · Filed Aug 20, 2026 · Closed Aug 21, 2026 · Cause: M 08-86 Internet Infringement
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2026-08-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
In RE: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:26-mc-00421 · Filed Aug 20, 2026 · Closed Aug 21, 2026 · Cause: M 08-86 Internet Infringement
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2026-08-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Luna v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:25-cv-00208 · Filed Jan 9, 2025 · Closed Apr 11, 2025 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 18:2710(c) Wrongful Disclosure of Video Tape Rental or Sales Records
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2025-04-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Harris v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:24-cv-01508 · Filed May 29, 2024 · Closed Aug 21, 2025 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 18:1030(g) - Fraud & Related Matters in Connection w/ Computers
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2025-08-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in CO (not the issuer's state)
L.A., by and through her Guardian Maurice Andrews v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:22-cv-01019 · Filed Feb 25, 2022 · Closed Mar 2, 2022 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2022-03-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
L.A., by and through her Guardian Maurice Andrews v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 3:22-cv-50071 · Filed Feb 25, 2022 · Closed Oct 3, 2022 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2022-10-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Take-Two Interactive Software UK Limited v. X-Play Online Games Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:17-cv-05774 · Filed Jul 31, 2017 · Closed Aug 4, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software UK Limited v. X-Play Online Games Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-08-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Benzies v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:16-cv-02736 · Filed Apr 12, 2016 · Closed Sep 14, 2016 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1441nr Notice of Removal
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2016-09-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. v. Benzies dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:16-cv-02699 · Filed Apr 11, 2016 · Closed Feb 8, 2019 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:2201dj Declaratory Judgment
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2019-02-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Santana v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:15-cv-08211 · Filed Oct 19, 2015 · Closed Jan 30, 2017 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Other
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2017-01-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Bruce McMahon v. Take-Two Interactive Software Inc judgment
District Court, C.D. California · No. 5:13-cv-02032 · Filed Nov 6, 2013 · Closed Jul 6, 2017 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 28:1441 Notice of Removal
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2017-07-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Wilamowsky v. Take Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:10-cv-07471 · Filed Sep 29, 2010 · Closed Sep 30, 2011 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Other
Role of Take Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2011-09-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Apogee Software, Ltd dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:09-cv-05054 · Filed May 29, 2009 · Closed May 28, 2010 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2010-05-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Securties and Exchange Commission v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:09-cv-03113 · Filed Apr 1, 2009 · Closed Apr 8, 2009 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2009-04-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Alexander v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, D. Nevada · No. 2:08-cv-01343 · Filed Oct 6, 2008 · Closed Jan 23, 2009 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2009-01-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. closed
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:08-mc-00360 · Filed Jun 5, 2008 · Closed Sep 10, 2008
Role of TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in DC (not the issuer's state)
Judd v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:07-cv-07932 · Filed Sep 10, 2007 · Closed Jan 11, 2010 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332oc Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-01-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Robinson v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:07-cv-01322 · Filed Feb 22, 2007 · Closed Mar 31, 2010 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Goldfine v. Take Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-06537 · Filed Aug 30, 2006 · Closed Mar 31, 2010 · Nature of suit: 370 Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud
Role of Take Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Brant dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-05279 · Filed Jul 12, 2006 · Closed Oct 20, 2010 · Nature of suit: 160 Stockholders Suits · Cause: 28:1332ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2010-10-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
People of the State of California v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-03895 · Filed May 22, 2006 · Closed Feb 22, 2010 · Nature of suit: Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Other
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-02-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
People of the State of California v. Take Two Interactive Software Inc dismissed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:06-cv-01986 · Filed Apr 3, 2006 · Closed May 10, 2006 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Take Two Interactive Software Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2006-05-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Flint, City of v. Take Two Interactive Software, Incorporated dismissed
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:06-cv-11210 · Filed Mar 21, 2006 · Closed Mar 31, 2006 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Take Two Interactive Software, Incorporated: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2006-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Toth v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-01733 · Filed Mar 3, 2006 · Closed Oct 18, 2010 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-10-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Stanhouse v. Take-Two Interactive Software dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-01174 · Filed Feb 15, 2006 · Closed Mar 31, 2010 · Nature of suit: Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Other
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Kaplan v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-01131 · Filed Feb 14, 2006 · Closed Oct 18, 2010 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-10-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Andrews v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:06-cv-00987 · Filed Feb 8, 2006 · Closed Oct 18, 2010 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-10-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Casey v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:05-cv-10013 · Filed Nov 29, 2005 · Closed Feb 15, 2010 · Nature of suit: Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-02-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Stanhouse v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. Illinois · No. 3:05-cv-00721 · Filed Oct 4, 2005 · Closed Feb 23, 2006 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2006-02-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
CASEY v. TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. closed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:05-cv-04268 · Filed Aug 10, 2005 · Closed Oct 20, 2005 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-10-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Carlson v. Take Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:05-cv-06907 · Filed Aug 3, 2005 · Closed Mar 31, 2010 · Nature of suit: Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud
Role of Take Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Samario v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:05-cv-06767 · Filed Jul 28, 2005 · Closed Mar 31, 2010 · Nature of suit: Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
In Re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer Litigation v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:05-cv-06734 · Filed Jul 27, 2005 · Closed Mar 31, 2010 · Nature of suit: 370 Fraud or Truth-In-Lending · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Other
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:05-cv-05443 · Filed Jun 9, 2005 · Closed Jun 22, 2005 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-06-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY)
VIS ENTERTAINMENT P.L.C. v. TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. · Filed Mar 9, 2004 · Closed Aug 11, 2004 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2004-08-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (NY); filed 2004, first Form D 2020
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:14 AM ET. Searched so far: 9 of 9 issuers in this group; 0 still to be searched. Results are added automatically.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

2 SEC releases

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Litigation release
SEC · Apr 1, 2009 · Parties as named in the release: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Read the release ↗
exact company name in the release title; issuer's state (NY) named in the release; city (NEW YORK) named
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Ryan Brant, Larry Muller, James David, Jr. Litigation release
SEC · Jun 9, 2005 · Parties as named in the release: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Ryan Brant, Larry Muller, James David, Jr. Read the release ↗
exact company name in the release title; issuer's state (NY) named in the release; city (NEW YORK) named
What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Zmc..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (64,910 actions): FINRA (38,350 actions, 1995–2026), NASAA (31 actions, 2000–2026; listing starts 1997), AK Division of Banking and Securities (273 actions, 1971–2025), AL Securities Commission (880 actions, 2001–2026), AR Securities Department (1,305 actions, 1998–2026), AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), CO Division of Securities (731 actions, 2001–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-05-02)), CT Department of Banking Securities Division (940 actions, 2006–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-04-22)), DC DISB Securities Bureau (25 actions, 2012–2026), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), FL Office of Financial Regulation (49 actions, 2018–2026), GA Secretary of State Securities Division (65 actions, 2015–2026; listing starts 2012), HI DCCA Securities Enforcement Branch (26 actions, 2012–2026), ID Department of Finance Securities Bureau (663 actions, 1994–2026), IL Secretary of State Securities Department (4,122 actions, 2003–2023), KS Insurance Department Securities Division (58 actions), KY Department of Financial Institutions (342 actions, 2005–2026), LA Office of Financial Institutions Securities Division (13 actions, 2010–2025; listing starts 2008), MA Secretary of the Commonwealth Securities Division (125 actions, 2012–2025; live site blocks automated access — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-02-04), MD Attorney General Securities Division (1,054 actions, 2004–2026), ME Office of Securities (539 actions, 2000–2026), MI LARA Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau (201 actions), MO Secretary of State Securities Division (919 actions, 1998–2026), MS Secretary of State Securities Division (209 actions, 1995–2026), MT Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (597 actions, 2000–2026), NC Secretary of State Securities Division (265 actions, 2004–2024), ND Securities Department (711 actions, 1990–2026; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-01-06), NH Bureau of Securities Regulation (402 actions, 2002–2026), NM Regulation and Licensing Department Securities Division (90 actions, 2010–2025), NV Secretary of State Securities Division (118 actions, 2018–2026), NY Attorney General Investor Protection Bureau (44 actions, 2012–2026), OH Division of Securities (327 actions, 1993–2006), OK Department of Securities (2,531 actions, 1998–2026), OR Division of Financial Regulation (589 actions, 1988–2026), PA Department of Banking and Securities (1,448 actions, 2008–2024; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-08-09), RI DBR Securities Division (98 actions, 2005–2025), SC Attorney General Securities Division (540 actions, 2006–2026), SD Division of Insurance – Securities Regulation (106 actions, 2017–2026), TN Department of Commerce and Insurance Securities Division (405 actions, 1992–2026), TX State Securities Board (936 actions, 1999–2026), UT Division of Securities (772 actions, 2000–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2010-05-27)), VT DFR Securities Division (137 actions, 2010–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026), WI DFI Division of Securities (1,072 actions, 1998–2026), WV Securities Commission (State Auditor) (64 actions), WY Secretary of State Compliance Division (6 actions, 2016–2024) — last crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

2 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Perez closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · No. 19-01234 · Filed Jul 22, 2019 · Closed May 8, 2020
Role of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 2020-05-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Siegel v. Take Two Interactive Software, Inc., a/k/a Take Tw closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 10-03516 · Filed Nov 9, 2010 · Closed Jun 12, 2012
Role of Siegel v. Take Two Interactive Software, Inc., a/k/a Take Tw: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2012-06-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:14 AM ET. Searched so far: 9 of 9 issuers in this group; 0 still to be searched. Results are added automatically.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

12 differences found between the filings for Zmc — 5 worth asking about (compared 15 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Apr 1, 2009

Regulator action naming a team member: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (Apr 1, 2009)

An SEC litigation release dated Apr 1, 2009 names TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC (member issuer). Our match estimate: 90%. The release is the source; we do not summarize its outcome here.

What this means A regulator filed or announced an action naming this person or company (or someone on the same filings). Read the release; ask the sponsor what it was and how it ended.

Sources
Worth asking · Jun 9, 2005

Regulator action naming a team member: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Ryan Brant, Larry Muller, James David, Jr. (Jun 9, 2005)

An SEC litigation release dated Jun 9, 2005 names TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC (member issuer). Our match estimate: 90%. The release is the source; we do not summarize its outcome here.

What this means A regulator filed or announced an action naming this person or company (or someone on the same filings). Read the release; ask the sponsor what it was and how it ended.

Sources
Note · Sep 22, 2000 – Aug 2, 2004

Bankruptcy case: Yang Shing Trading Inc v. Turkewitz — filed Sep 22, 2000

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York docket "Yang Shing Trading Inc v. Turkewitz" filed Sep 22, 2000, closed Aug 2, 2004. Jordan Turkewitz (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("Turkewitz"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Mar 26, 1998 – Sep 20, 2000

Bankruptcy case: Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. L & G Laybourne — filed Mar 26, 1998

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York docket "Richard C. Breeden, Esq. v. L & G Laybourne" filed Mar 26, 1998, closed Sep 20, 2000. Geraldine Laybourne (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("L & G Laybourne"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Jul 11, 2019

Zmc includes 2 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target

ZMC III PARALLEL, L.P. (last filing Jul 11, 2019; $0 sold of $750,000,000); ZMC III, L.P. (last filing Jul 11, 2019; $0 sold of $750,000,000). Each has no filing in more than two years and reported under half its target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Note · Aug 17, 2020 – Sep 18, 2020

Form D filed 32 days after the first sale — TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC

The filing says the first sale was Aug 17, 2020. The Form D was filed Sep 18, 2020 — 32 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 17 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Oct 25, 2013 – Mar 13, 2024

4 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — ZMC IV, L.P. (latest filing Mar 13, 2024) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — ZMC IV PARALLEL, L.P. (latest filing Mar 13, 2024) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC (latest filing Sep 18, 2020) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — ZMC II, L.P. (latest filing Sep 3, 2015)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Worth asking · Sep 4, 2014 – Sep 3, 2015

ZM Capital Partners II, L.L.C. is no longer listed on the Sep 3, 2015 amendment — ZMC II, L.P.

ZM Capital Partners II, L.L.C. appears on the Sep 4, 2014 Form D/A (promoter) but not on the Sep 3, 2015 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Worth asking · Nov 22, 2010 – Jan 9, 2012

SATYAN MALHOTRA is no longer listed on the Jan 9, 2012 amendment — Alloy Media Co-Investors, L.L.C.

SATYAN MALHOTRA appears on the Nov 22, 2010 Form D (director) but not on the Jan 9, 2012 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Worth asking · Nov 22, 2010 – Jan 9, 2012

SATYAN MALHOTRA is no longer listed on the Jan 9, 2012 amendment — Alloy Media Investments, L.L.C.

SATYAN MALHOTRA appears on the Nov 22, 2010 Form D (director) but not on the Jan 9, 2012 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Nov 22, 2010 – Jul 11, 2019

Andrew Vogel is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Andrew Vogel" on 7 filings (from Nov 22, 2010), and "Andrew E. Vogel" on 7 filings (from Jul 11, 2019).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 9 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 13, 2024 D/A
ZMC IV PARALLEL, L.P.
File 021-475869
$0$0$0 (est.)
The general partner is entitled to a carried interest. The investment manager is entitled to a management fee. Such carried interest and management fee are fully discussed in the Issuer's confidential offering materials.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 13, 2024 D/A
ZMC IV, L.P.
File 021-475870
$0$0$0 (est.)
The general partner is entitled to a carried interest. The investment manager is entitled to a management fee. Such carried interest and management fee are fully discussed in the Issuer's confidential offering materials.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 9, 2021 D
ZMC II EXTENDED VALUE FUND, L.P.
File 021-409261
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
The general partner is entitled to carried interest.
EVERCORE GROUP L.L.C. BrokerCheck CRD 42405 ↗EDGAR ↗
Sep 18, 2020 D
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INC
File 021-375906
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 11, 2019 D
ZMC III, L.P.
File 021-344042
$0$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
The general partner is entitled to a carried interest. The investment manager is entitled to a management fee. Such carried interest and management fee are fully discussed in the Issuer's confidential offering materials.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 11, 2019 D
ZMC III PARALLEL, L.P.
File 021-344043
$0$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
The general partner is entitled to a carried interest. The investment manager is entitled to a management fee. Such carried interest and management fee are fully discussed in the Issuer's confidential offering materials.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 3, 2015 D/A
ZMC II, L.P.
File 021-203752
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 9, 2012 D/A
Alloy Media Investments, L.L.C.
File 021-150866
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 9, 2012 D/A
Alloy Media Co-Investors, L.L.C.
File 021-150863
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 9 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 10:13 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Zmc in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 10:13 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026) — 1,032,426 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027) — 285,535 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 514,336 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published) — 538,619 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026) — 1,263,035 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published); Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 1999–2026); also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed. Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 8:30 AM ET; King County WA Assessor Real Property Sales extract (EXTR_RPSale.csv) Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Palm Beach 60) Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Broward 16) Oct 24, 2026, 8:24 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 24, 2026, 8:23 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 24, 2026, 8:21 AM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗AM Alloy Media Investments, L.L.C.shared people, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)NEW YORK, NYOther2$53,400,3896No minimum reported2010–2012
EDGAR ↗AM Alloy Media Co-Investors, L.L.C.shared people, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)NEW YORK, NYOther2$33,400,3898No minimum reported2010–2012
EDGAR ↗ZL ZMC II, L.P.shared people, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund3$360,725,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
78
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2013–2015
EDGAR ↗ZL ZMC III, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $750,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2019–2019
EDGAR ↗ZP ZMC III PARALLEL, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $750,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2019–2019
EDGAR ↗TT TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INCshared peopleNEW YORK, NYOther1$101,996,768
offering Indefinite · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
26
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2020–2020
EDGAR ↗ZE ZMC II EXTENDED VALUE FUND, L.P.shared people, same business addressNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2021–2021
EDGAR ↗ZP ZMC IV PARALLEL, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund2$670,700,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
10
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2023–2024
EDGAR ↗ZL ZMC IV, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund2$670,700,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
67
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2023–2024

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other / 506(b) (18,678 filings); Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 13, 2024ZMC IV, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$670,700,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 13, 2024ZMC IV PARALLEL, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$670,700,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 15, 2023ZMC IV, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Mar 15, 2023ZMC IV PARALLEL, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Aug 9, 2021ZMC II EXTENDED VALUE FUND, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Sep 18, 2020TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE INCDOtherIndefinite$101,996,768
EDGAR ↗Jul 11, 2019ZMC III PARALLEL, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$750,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Jul 11, 2019ZMC III, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$750,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Sep 3, 2015ZMC II, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$360,725,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 4, 2014ZMC II, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$168,550,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 30, 2013ZMC II, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Jan 9, 2012Alloy Media Co-Investors, L.L.C.D/AOther$33,400,389$33,400,389
EDGAR ↗Jan 9, 2012Alloy Media Investments, L.L.C.D/AOther$53,400,389$53,400,389
EDGAR ↗Nov 22, 2010Alloy Media Co-Investors, L.L.C.DOther$33,400,389$33,400,389
EDGAR ↗Nov 22, 2010Alloy Media Investments, L.L.C.DOther$53,400,389$53,400,389

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 13, 2024. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other (2010), Pooled Investment Fund (2013–2019), Other (2020). Latest offering: Pooled Investment Fund (2021–2023; most recent Mar 15, 2023).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
SZ Strauss ZelnickExecutive Officer, Director9Nov 22, 2010 → Mar 13, 2024
AV Andrew VogelExecutive Officer, Director8Nov 22, 2010 → Mar 13, 2024
JT Jordan TurkewitzExecutive Officer, Director8Nov 22, 2010 → Mar 13, 2024
KS KARL SLATOFFExecutive Officer7Sep 30, 2013 → Mar 13, 2024
SS SEYMOUR SAMMELLExecutive Officer6Sep 30, 2013 → Mar 13, 2024
ZP ZMC PARTNERS IV, L.L.C. entityPromoter2Mar 15, 2023 → Mar 13, 2024
ZP ZMC PARTNERS III, L.L.C. entityPromoter2Jul 11, 2019 → Jul 11, 2019
NG Nitin GuptaDirector2Jan 9, 2012 → Jan 9, 2012
JJ James K. Johnson, Jr.Director2Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012
MD Matthew C. DiamondDirector2Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012
GL Geraldine LaybourneDirector2Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012
BG Brian GildeaDirector2Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012
WJ William Jemas, Jr.Director2Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012
SM SATYAN MALHOTRADirector2Nov 22, 2010 → Nov 22, 2010
ZE ZMC EVF GP, L.L.C. entityPromoter1Aug 9, 2021 → Aug 9, 2021
LG Lainie GoldsteinExecutive Officer1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
PV Paul VieraDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
RH Roland HernandezDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
LS LaVerne SrinivasanDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
JM J MosesDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
DE Daniel EmersonExecutive Officer1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
MS Michael ShereskyDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
MD Michael DornemannDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
ST Susan TolsonDirector1Sep 18, 2020 → Sep 18, 2020
ZP ZMC Partners II, L.L.C. entityPromoter1Sep 3, 2015 → Sep 3, 2015
ZC ZM Capital Partners II, L.L.C. entityPromoter1Sep 30, 2013 → Sep 4, 2014
ZC ZM Capital, L.P. entityPromoter1Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012
ZC ZM Capital Partners, L.L.C. entityPromoter1Nov 22, 2010 → Jan 9, 2012

Business registration (state registry / Secretary of State)

1 of 9 issuers have a matched state registry record — records by status: active 1.

Registries searched: AL (Alabama Secretary of State — Business Entity Records (arc-sos.state.al.us), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); CO (Colorado Secretary of State — Business Entities in Colorado (data.colorado.gov), data as of Oct 23, 2026); CT (Connecticut Secretary of the State — Business Registry (data.ct.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026); FL (Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations — quarterly corporate data file (Sunbiz), data as of Oct 7, 2026); NY (New York Department of State — Corporations and Other Entities (data.ny.gov: All Filings + Active Corporations), data as of Oct 20, 2026); OR (Oregon Secretary of State — Active Businesses, All (data.oregon.gov), data as of Oct 20, 2026); PA (Pennsylvania Department of State — Registered Businesses, Current (data.pa.gov), data as of Oct 6, 2026); TX (Texas Comptroller — Active Franchise Taxpayers incl. Secretary of State file data (data.texas.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026). Registries of other states have not been searched: many publish no bulk file and require a CAPTCHA or bot challenge on their search page, which we do not bypass (Delaware, for example, offers no public bulk file). A registry listing is the state's own record of the entity; it says nothing about the offering itself.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Zmc.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Zmc as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Zmc's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #104,201 of 374,652 in line (1,386 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NEW YORK), NY). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.