PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:45 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

W

Weber

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · San Francisco, CA

Grouped because: 2 shared people, 1 shared management entity, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$61.1Mreported sold
32investors
10Form D filings
2010–2025active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jun 10, 2025 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Weber is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 10 Form D filings between Dec 2010 and Jun 2025.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 15 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $61.1M to 32 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in CA (2).

What this means $61.1M raised across the group, about $1.91M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Colin Hillberg (2 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter), Eugene M. Weber (2 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter), Weber Capital Management, LLC (2 issuers, executive officer and director, entity) and Salvador Ibanezde Opacua (1 issuer, executive officer and promoter).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Jun 10, 2025.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Adviser registration (Form ADV) on record: WEBER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 23 court cases matching the name, 3 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 26 records came back, including 2 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 10 public filings for Weber and found 17 differences, 4 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; Investor count went down between filings; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Weber has not run yet — it is joining a line of 26,805 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

23 cases: 2 open, 14 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 4 dismissed, 3 judgment

Wesley v. Weber, Incorporated open matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:25-cv-01350 · Filed Apr 30, 2025
Role of Weber, Incorporated: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CO (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:24-mc-09002 · Filed Jan 24, 2024 · Closed Mar 25, 2025
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2025-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:23-cv-15902 · Filed Nov 13, 2023 · Closed Nov 17, 2023 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2023-11-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
McElroy v. Weber Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:23-cv-00476 · Filed Jan 19, 2023 · Closed Feb 23, 2023 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Weber Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2023-02-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Michalski v. Weber Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:22-cv-03966 · Filed Jul 29, 2022 · Closed Sep 27, 2023 · Nature of suit: Securities/Commodities · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Role of Weber Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2023-09-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 5:21-cv-06176 · Filed Dec 28, 2021 · Closed Jan 4, 2022
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2022-01-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 5:21-cv-06172 · Filed Dec 20, 2021 · Closed Jan 4, 2022
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2022-01-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 5:21-cv-06171 · Filed Dec 20, 2021 · Closed Jan 4, 2022
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2022-01-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:21-cv-06421 · Filed Dec 1, 2021 · Closed Dec 1, 2021
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2021-12-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:21-cv-06429 · Filed Dec 1, 2021 · Closed Dec 20, 2021
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2021-12-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:21-cv-06425 · Filed Dec 1, 2021 · Closed Dec 17, 2021
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2021-12-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Weber, Inc. v. Neeser Construction, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, D. Alaska · No. 4:21-cv-00021 · Filed Sep 1, 2021 · Closed Jan 14, 2022 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller Act · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of Weber, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2022-01-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AK (not the issuer's state)
United Fire & Casualty Company v. Weber, Inc. open matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:18-cv-03146 · Filed Nov 8, 2018 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 2018, issuer incorporated 2023
Aldridge v. Grant and Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, E.D. California · No. 2:17-cv-00375 · Filed Feb 21, 2017 · Closed Apr 18, 2017 · Nature of suit: 480 Consumer Credit · Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Role of Weber, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2017-04-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA); filed 2017, issuer incorporated 2023
Weber, Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:15-cv-05930 · Filed Dec 21, 2015 · Closed Jul 21, 2020 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Weber, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2020-07-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: want of prosecution Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA); filed 2015, issuer incorporated 2023
Weber, Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 5:15-cv-06135 · Filed Oct 7, 2015 · Closed Dec 18, 2015 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Weber, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2015-12-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state); filed 2015, issuer incorporated 2023
Aviva Goldstein v. Grant and Weber Inc judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:12-cv-09018 · Filed Oct 19, 2012 · Closed Jun 28, 2013 · Nature of suit: 480 Consumer Credit · Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Role of Weber Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2013-06-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA); filed 2012, issuer incorporated 2023
WORKERS LOCAL 19 v. WEBER CO judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:90-cv-00368 · Filed Jun 6, 1990 · Closed Aug 2, 1990 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of WEBER CO: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1990-08-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 1990, issuer incorporated 2023
TRU-FLEX RECREATIONAL v. THE WEBER COMPANY, INC. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. · Filed Dec 5, 1989 · Closed Jan 10, 1990 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of THE WEBER COMPANY, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1990-01-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TX (not the issuer's state); filed 1989, issuer incorporated 2023
Tru-Flex Recreationa v. Weber CO closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:89-cv-01954 · Filed Sep 7, 1989 · Closed Nov 30, 1989 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Weber CO: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1989-11-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MA (not the issuer's state); filed 1989, issuer incorporated 2023
WEBER CORP v. TOYAMA ETAL dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, D. Hawaii · No. · Filed Jun 22, 1988 · Closed Sep 9, 1988 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of WEBER CORP: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1988-09-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in HI (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, issuer incorporated 2023
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS, ET v. WEBER, INC. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:88-cv-00346 · Filed Feb 17, 1988 · Closed Apr 4, 1988 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of WEBER, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1988-04-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, issuer incorporated 2023
GRUBER v. WEBER INC. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 1:85-cv-00063 · Filed Mar 1, 1985 · Closed Feb 22, 2001 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of WEBER INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2001-02-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state); filed 1985, issuer incorporated 2023
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Weber..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

3 cases: 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Weber, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · No. 22-00122 · Filed Sep 14, 2022 · Closed Jan 13, 2025
Role of Weber, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2025-01-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AK (not the issuer's state)
Lu And Weber Corporation v. Hagerty closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:04-ap-01296 · Filed May 3, 2004 · Closed May 5, 2006
Role of Weber Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 2006-05-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2023
Suncruz Casinos LLC v. Weber Company Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Weber)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · No. 03-02859 · Filed Jun 20, 2003 · Closed Feb 27, 2004
Role of Weber Company Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2004-02-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2023
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

17 differences found between the filings for Weber — 4 worth asking about (compared 10 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jan 26, 2018 – Mar 23, 2020

Amount sold went down between filings — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

The Jan 26, 2018 filing says $11,110,000 sold; the Mar 23, 2020 Form D/A says $9,260,000 sold — $1,850,000 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Jan 26, 2018 – Mar 23, 2020

Investor count went down between filings — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

The Jan 26, 2018 filing reports 18 investors; the Mar 23, 2020 Form D/A reports 14 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Jan 30, 2015 – Feb 1, 2016

Investor count went down between filings — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

The Jan 30, 2015 filing reports 19 investors; the Feb 1, 2016 Form D/A reports 17 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Note · Mar 23, 2020

Last filing Mar 23, 2020 with 22% of the target sold — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

Weber Capital Partners V, L.P. (last filing Mar 23, 2020; $11,110,000 sold of $50,000,000). There is no filing in more than two years and the last one reported under half the target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Note · Mar 23, 2020

38 other issuers file from the same address — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

The address on file, 345 California Street, Suite 1710, San Francisco, CA, is used by 39 issuers in our index across 9 sponsor groups; 38 are outside this group. It is on our registered-agent / shared-office list (45 issuers in 17 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many unrelated companies file from this address. Often a registered agent or a fund administrator; sometimes a shared office. Ask where the team actually works.

Sources
Note · Sep 1, 2023 – Sep 19, 2023

Form D filed 18 days after the first sale — WCM Microcap Fund, LP

The filing says the first sale was Sep 1, 2023. The Form D was filed Sep 19, 2023 — 18 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 3 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Sep 1, 2023 – Jun 10, 2025

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — WCM Microcap Fund, LP (latest filing Jun 10, 2025)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jun 10, 2025 (first sale Sep 1, 2023). It reports $51,850,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Dec 7, 2010 – Mar 23, 2020

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P. (latest filing Mar 23, 2020)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 23, 2020 (first sale Dec 7, 2010). It reports $9,260,000 sold of $50,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Worth asking · Sep 19, 2023 – Jun 10, 2025

Salvador Ibanezde Opacua is no longer listed on the Jun 10, 2025 amendment — WCM Microcap Fund, LP

Salvador Ibanezde Opacua appears on the Sep 19, 2023 Form D (executive officer, promoter) but not on the Jun 10, 2025 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Sep 19, 2023 – Jun 10, 2025

Colin Hillberg's role changed at WCM Microcap Fund, LP: executive officer, promoter → executive officer, director

The Sep 19, 2023 filing lists Colin Hillberg as executive officer, promoter; the Jun 10, 2025 Form D/A lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Sep 19, 2023 – Jun 10, 2025

Eugene M. Weber's role changed at WCM Microcap Fund, LP: executive officer, promoter → executive officer, director

The Sep 19, 2023 filing lists Eugene M. Weber as executive officer, promoter; the Jun 10, 2025 Form D/A lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Sep 19, 2023 – Jun 10, 2025

Weber Capital Management, LLC's role changed at WCM Microcap Fund, LP: executive officer → director

The Sep 19, 2023 filing lists Weber Capital Management, LLC as executive officer; the Jun 10, 2025 Form D/A lists director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Dec 21, 2010 – Nov 14, 2012

Minimum investment changed between filings — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

The Dec 21, 2010 filing lists a minimum of $50,000; the Nov 14, 2012 Form D/A lists $85,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
Note · Dec 21, 2010 – Sep 19, 2023

Colin Hillberg is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Colin Hillberg" on 8 filings (from Dec 21, 2010), and "Colin Theodore Hillberg" on 2 filings (from Sep 19, 2023).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Dec 21, 2010 – Sep 19, 2023

Eugene M. Weber is written 3 different ways on the filings

listed as "Eugene M. Weber" on 7 filings (from Dec 21, 2010), and "Eugene Weber" on the Mar 23, 2020 filing, and "Eugene Michael Weber" on 2 filings (from Sep 19, 2023).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Mar 23, 2020

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

The latest filing lists 345 California Street, Suite 1710, San Francisco, CA. That address is used by 45 issuers in our index (45 issuers in 17 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Sources
Note · Dec 21, 2010 – Mar 23, 2020

Issuer used a different name before — Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Weber Capital Partners III, L.P.; WEBER CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P.. The current name on file is "Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 2 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 1 reports proceeds to related persons totalling $157,770.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jun 10, 2025 D/A
WCM Microcap Fund, LP
File 021-492416
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 23, 2020 D/A
Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.
File 021-152279
$0$0$157,770
Management fees for 2019
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:43 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Weber in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:43 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2010–2026) — 864,153 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:43 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2010–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:43 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗WC Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesSan Francisco, CAPooled Investment Fund8$11,110,000
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
19
similar: 4–27
$85,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2010–2020
EDGAR ↗WM WCM Microcap Fund, LPshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesSAN FRANCISCO, CAPooled Investment Fund2$51,850,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
13
similar: 4–27
$100,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2023–2025

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jun 10, 2025WCM Microcap Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$51,850,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 19, 2023WCM Microcap Fund, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$20,550,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 23, 2020Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$9,260,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 26, 2018Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$11,110,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 27, 2017Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$10,785,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 1, 2016Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$9,715,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 30, 2015Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$9,715,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2014Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$9,645,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 14, 2012Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.D/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$7,385,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 21, 2010Weber Capital Partners V, L.P.DPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$3,950,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jun 10, 2025. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2010–2023).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
CH Colin HillbergExecutive Officer, Promoter, Director2Dec 21, 2010 → Jun 10, 2025
EW Eugene M. WeberExecutive Officer, Promoter, Director2Dec 21, 2010 → Jun 10, 2025
WC Weber Capital Management, LLC entityExecutive Officer, Director2Dec 21, 2010 → Jun 10, 2025
SO Salvador Ibanezde OpacuaExecutive Officer, Promoter1Sep 19, 2023 → Sep 19, 2023

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

WEBER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC — SEC-registered investment adviser · SEC registration status as reported: “Approved” since Apr 13, 2026 · SEC file 801-135738 · Main office: Not reported · IAPD record ↗ · Form ADV filing (PDF) ↗

Regulatory assets under management: $120,225,941 as reported on Form ADV filed Apr 30, 2026 (Item 5.F(2)(c)) · 4 accounts (Item 5.F(2)(f))

Websites listed on Form ADV (Item 1.I): WWW.WEBERCAPITAL.COM ↗

Item 11 disclosure questions as answered on Form ADV filed Apr 30, 2026: 0 of 24 answered “Yes”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11 asks: “Do any of the events below involve you or any of your supervised persons?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(1) asks: “A. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(2) asks: “A. (2) been charged with any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(1) asks: “B. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to a misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related business, or any fraud, false statements, or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(2) asks: “B. (2) been charged with a misdemeanor listed in Item 11.B(1)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(1) asks: “C. Has the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(2) asks: “C. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(3) asks: “C. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(4) asks: “C. (4) entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(5) asks: “C. (5) imposed a civil money penalty on you or any advisory affiliate, or ordered you or any advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(1) asks: “D. Has any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority: (1) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission, or been dishonest, unfair, or unethical?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(2) asks: “D. (2) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(3) asks: “D. (3) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(4) asks: “D. (4) in the past ten years, entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(5) asks: “D. (5) ever denied, suspended, or revoked your or any advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented you or any advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted your or any advisory affiliate's activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(1) asks: “E. Has any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(2) asks: “E. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(3) asks: “E. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been the cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(4) asks: “E. (4) disciplined you or any advisory affiliate by expelling or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from membership, barring or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from association with other members, or otherwise restricting your or the advisory affiliate's activities?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11F asks: “F. Has an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or any advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11G asks: “G. Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any regulatory proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.C., 11.D., or 11.E.?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(a) asks: “H. (1) Has any domestic or foreign court: (a) in the past ten years, enjoined you or any advisory affiliate in connection with any investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(b) asks: “H. (1)(b) ever found that you or any advisory affiliate were involved in a violation of investment-related statutes or regulations?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(c) asks: “H. (1)(c) ever dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or any advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(2) asks: “H. (2) Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H(1)?”

Answers as filed by the adviser on Form ADV Part 1A, Item 11; question text quoted from the form. Details of each “Yes” are in the Disclosure Reporting Pages of the Form ADV (PDF) ↗.

Matched on management entity listed on Form D = adviser name, no state to compare · Form ADV data: SEC Investment Adviser Information Report (SEC-registered advisers), file dated 2026-10-02, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:39 PM ET · IAPD record last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:36 PM ET

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Weber as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Weber's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #68,318 of 374,652 in line (1,312 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: SAN FRANCISCO), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.