PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:38 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Issuer

ID

Insight Direct, Inc.

Corporation · organized in Delaware · formed 2007 · Boston, MA

$1.3Mreported sold (max)
4investors (max)
1offering
2Form D filings
2009–2010filing years
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing by this issuer Mar 12, 2010 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:11 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Insight Direct, Inc. is a corporation organized in Delaware (formed 2007), based in Boston, MA.

What this means A deal company is usually set up for one investment; its Form D is the notice it files after selling to investors.

It has filed 2 Form D filings (1 original and 1 amendment, Jul 29, 2009 to Mar 12, 2010) for 1 offering, other technology under Rule 506: $1M sold of $1M offered to 1 investor, minimum investment $1M, first sale Feb 25, 2010.

What this means 100% of the target was sold by the filing date — about $1M per investor.

Key people as listed: Christopher Chapman (director), David O'Connor (executive officer), James Koch (executive officer), James Triandiflou (executive officer and director), John P. Ward (director) and 3 more.

What this means These are the people the company itself named as running or promoting it. Tap a name to see every other deal they are on.

No sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders are reported. No sales-compensation recipients are listed.

What this means No broker was paid — the sponsor sold it directly to investors.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest amendment Jul 29, 2009; latest filing Mar 12, 2010.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year — this deal company may be done raising, or simply quiet.

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Insight Direct, Inc..

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 23 court cases matching the name, 38 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 61 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 2 public filings for Insight Direct, Inc. and found 7 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; Investor count went down between filings; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Insight Direct, Inc. has not run yet — it is joining a line of 19,616 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 32 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

23 cases: 10 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 12 dismissed, 1 judgment

Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Dodge closed
District Court, D. Connecticut · No. 3:24-cv-01169 · Filed Jul 9, 2024 · Closed Nov 8, 2024
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Dodge: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-11-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CT (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Jackson closed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:24-cv-11751 · Filed Jul 8, 2024 · Closed Nov 12, 2024
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Jackson: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-11-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (MA)
Insight Direct USA, Inc v. Steinmetz closed
District Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 2:24-cv-03621 · Filed Jul 3, 2024 · Closed Nov 13, 2024
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc v. Steinmetz: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-11-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. WalMart, Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · No. 5:24-cv-05109 · Filed May 16, 2024 · Closed May 31, 2024
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. WalMart, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-05-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA Inc v. Clubb closed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:21-cv-00585 · Filed Mar 15, 2021 · Closed Jul 16, 2021
Role of Insight Direct USA Inc v. Clubb: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2021-07-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. LoadSpring Solutions, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:20-cv-10538 · Filed Mar 17, 2020 · Closed May 12, 2020 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. LoadSpring Solutions, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-05-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (MA)
SAP America, Inc. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:20-cv-01714 · Filed Mar 11, 2020 · Closed Apr 10, 2020 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of SAP America, Inc. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-04-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
SAP AMERICA, INC. v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA, INC. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:19-mc-00205 · Filed Dec 19, 2019 · Closed Jan 10, 2020 · Nature of suit: 230 Rent, lease, ejectment
Role of SAP AMERICA, INC. v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-01-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Dieterle v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 4:19-mc-80293 · Filed Dec 17, 2019 · Closed Dec 18, 2019
Role of Dieterle v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2019-12-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Winkler v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:19-mc-00130 · Filed Dec 17, 2019 · Closed Feb 18, 2020
Role of Winkler v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-02-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CO (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA Incorporated v. Gorilla Incorporated closed
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:19-mc-00042 · Filed Dec 16, 2019 · Closed Jul 7, 2020 · Nature of suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions · Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Role of Insight Direct USA Incorporated v. Gorilla Incorporated: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-07-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AZ (not the issuer's state)
Winkler v. Insight Direct, Inc. closed
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:19-cv-03566 · Filed Dec 16, 2019 · Closed Dec 18, 2019 · Nature of suit: 896 Arbitration · Cause: 05:304 Subpoenas
Role of Insight Direct, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2019-12-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in CO (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Swan dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:19-cv-03183 · Filed May 10, 2019 · Closed Nov 13, 2020 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1330 Breach of Contract
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Swan: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-11-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA Incorporated v. Wipro Limited dismissed
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:18-cv-02471 · Filed Aug 3, 2018 · Closed Oct 10, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Insight Direct USA Incorporated v. Wipro Limited: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-10-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AZ (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:17-cv-06469 · Filed Aug 24, 2017 · Closed Nov 21, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-11-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Kelleher judgment
District Court, W.D. Texas · No. 1:17-cv-00252 · Filed Mar 23, 2017 · Closed Apr 28, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Kelleher: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-04-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA Inc v. Osterman dismissed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:16-cv-00404 · Filed Feb 12, 2016 · Closed May 25, 2016 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other Contract · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Insight Direct USA Inc v. Osterman: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2016-05-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Ulrich dismissed
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:12-cv-03100 · Filed Dec 12, 2012 · Closed Jan 31, 2013 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Ulrich: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-01-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA Incorporated v. Foot Locker Incorporated dismissed
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:10-cv-01782 · Filed Aug 19, 2010 · Closed Aug 23, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Insight Direct USA Incorporated v. Foot Locker Incorporated: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-08-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AZ (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Does 1-4 dismissed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:06-cv-04870 · Filed Sep 8, 2006 · Closed Mar 6, 2007 · Nature of suit: 470 Civil (RICO)
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. Does 1-4: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-03-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc v. Infostaf Consulting, Inc. dismissed
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:04-cv-01797 · Filed Aug 17, 2004 · Closed May 25, 2006 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc v. Infostaf Consulting, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-05-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA v. GHA Technologies Inc dismissed
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:03-cv-01712 · Filed Sep 4, 2003 · Closed May 16, 2005 · Nature of suit: 470 Civil (RICO)
Role of Insight Direct USA v. GHA Technologies Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-05-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AZ (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct Inc v. Fulcrum Direct Inc dismissed
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:98-cv-00666 · Filed Apr 15, 1998 · Closed Jun 29, 1998 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Insight Direct Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1998-06-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in AZ (not the issuer's state); filed 1998, issuer incorporated 2007
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:11 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Insight Direct, Inc...

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

38 cases: 6 open, 32 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Miller v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. open
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 26-50517 · Filed Jun 23, 2026
Role of Miller v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
INSIGHT DIRECT USA INC open
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 26-00118 · Filed Feb 24, 2026
Role of INSIGHT DIRECT USA INC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Pitta v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. open
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 25-01857 · Filed Oct 10, 2025
Role of Pitta v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
Beskrone v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. open
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 25-50690 · Filed May 1, 2025
Role of Beskrone v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Ehrenberg v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA INC. open
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 2:25-ap-01127 · Filed Apr 16, 2025
Role of Ehrenberg v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA INC.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Old Revco GUC Liquidating Trust v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. open
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 24-01240 · Filed Jan 30, 2024
Role of Old Revco GUC Liquidating Trust v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Kravitz v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 21-50677 · Filed Jun 15, 2021 · Closed Feb 17, 2022
Role of Kravitz v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2022-02-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Sizmek DSP, Inc. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 20-01133 · Filed Jun 3, 2020 · Closed Apr 14, 2021
Role of Sizmek DSP, Inc. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-04-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Development Specialists, Inc., as Liquidating Trus v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · No. 17-30022 · Filed Apr 20, 2017 · Closed Sep 6, 2017
Role of Development Specialists, Inc., as Liquidating Trus v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2017-09-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IA (not the issuer's state)
Kravitz, Esq. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 16-51721 · Filed Dec 19, 2016 · Closed Jul 7, 2017
Role of Kravitz, Esq. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2017-07-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Kennedy v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · No. 15-05060 · Filed Apr 28, 2015 · Closed Sep 22, 2015
Role of Kennedy v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-09-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in KY (not the issuer's state)
AFA Investment Inc., Debtors in Possession v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 14-50180 · Filed Mar 28, 2014 · Closed Jul 18, 2014
Role of AFA Investment Inc., Debtors in Possession v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2014-07-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
The Kodak GUC Trust, by and through Alan D. Halper v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 14-01748 · Filed Jan 17, 2014 · Closed Jul 1, 2015
Role of The Kodak GUC Trust, by and through Alan D. Halper v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-07-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Hyman v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:11-ap-01028 · Filed Aug 26, 2011 · Closed Sep 7, 2011
Role of Hyman v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-09-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Giuliano v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 11-52198 · Filed May 25, 2011 · Closed Dec 7, 2011
Role of Giuliano v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-12-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Bogdanov v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. d/b/a PC Wholesale closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · No. 07-01018 · Filed Jan 5, 2007 · Closed Jul 24, 2007
Role of Bogdanov v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. d/b/a PC Wholesale: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-07-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NH (not the issuer's state)
Wagner Casting Company v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 06-05532 · Filed Sep 27, 2006 · Closed Jan 5, 2007
Role of Wagner Casting Company v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-01-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. American Moulding and Millwork Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 06-02118 · Filed Feb 10, 2006 · Closed Feb 21, 2006
Role of Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. American Moulding and Millwork Co.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-02-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Glass v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 06-04045 · Filed Feb 9, 2006 · Closed Apr 10, 2006
Role of Glass v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-04-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
The Liquidation Committee v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · No. 05-03438 · Filed Sep 30, 2005 · Closed Jul 11, 2006
Role of The Liquidation Committee v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-07-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NC (not the issuer's state)
David R. Herzog, not individually, but solely as C v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Comark Corp., Sales closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 05-00387 · Filed Jan 21, 2005 · Closed Jul 19, 2005
Role of David R. Herzog, not individually, but solely as C v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Comark Corp., Sales: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-07-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Michael B. Joseph, Chapter 7 Trustee for the estat v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Comark Corp Sales I closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 04-53926 · Filed Jun 11, 2004 · Closed Mar 29, 2005
Role of Michael B. Joseph, Chapter 7 Trustee for the estat v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Comark Corp Sales I: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-03-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Michael B. Joseph, Chapter 7 Trustee for the estat v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Comark Corp Sales I closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 04-53899 · Filed Jun 10, 2004 · Closed Jun 22, 2004
Role of Michael B. Joseph, Chapter 7 Trustee for the estat v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Comark Corp Sales I: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-06-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
AboveNet, Inc. (f/k/a Metromedia Fiber Network, In v. Insight Direct, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 04-08695 · Filed May 17, 2004 · Closed Mar 17, 2005
Role of Insight Direct, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2005-03-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in NY (not the issuer's state); filed 2004, issuer incorporated 2007
HLI Creditor Trust v. Insight Enterprises, Inc., f/k/a Insight Direct, U closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 03-58785 · Filed Nov 18, 2003 · Closed Sep 17, 2004
Role of HLI Creditor Trust v. Insight Enterprises, Inc., f/k/a Insight Direct, U: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-09-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
PHOENIX RESTAURANT GROUP v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA, INC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. 3:03-ap-00639 · Filed Oct 31, 2003 · Closed May 4, 2005
Role of PHOENIX RESTAURANT GROUP v. INSIGHT DIRECT USA, INC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-05-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
Breakaway Solutions, Inc. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 03-55706 · Filed Sep 4, 2003 · Closed Nov 17, 2004
Role of Breakaway Solutions, Inc. v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-11-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Insight Direct USA,Inc.an Arizona Corporation v. Barcomb closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 03-01156 · Filed May 22, 2003 · Closed Jul 22, 2004
Role of Insight Direct USA,Inc.an Arizona Corporation v. Barcomb: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-07-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
David Neier, Chapter 11 Trustee of the Bankruptcy v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Insight Direct, Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 03-53044 · Filed Apr 27, 2003 · Closed Jun 9, 2004
Role of David Neier, Chapter 11 Trustee of the Bankruptcy v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. f/k/a Insight Direct, Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-06-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Maxwell v. Insight Direct Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 03-01067 · Filed Mar 28, 2003 · Closed Jun 7, 2005
Role of Insight Direct Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2005-06-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2007
King v. Insight Direct Worldwide, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 02-08298 · Filed Dec 12, 2002 · Closed Aug 24, 2004
Role of King v. Insight Direct Worldwide, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-08-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Moglia v. Insight Direct Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 02-02021 · Filed Dec 12, 2002 · Closed Mar 13, 2003
Role of Insight Direct Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2003-03-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 2002, issuer incorporated 2007
STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. INSIGHT DIRECT INC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:02-ap-01040 · Filed Aug 30, 2002 · Closed Feb 10, 2004
Role of INSIGHT DIRECT INC: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2004-02-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in AR (not the issuer's state); filed 2002, issuer incorporated 2007
Wood v. Insight Direct Worldwide Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · No. 02-01117 · Filed Feb 14, 2002 · Closed May 22, 2002
Role of Wood v. Insight Direct Worldwide Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-05-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Brick v. Insight Direct USA, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · No. 1-01-01536 · Filed Dec 19, 2001 · Closed Dec 13, 2002
Role of Brick v. Insight Direct USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-12-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Post Confirmation Committee v. Insight Direct, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · No. 00-06247 · Filed Nov 9, 2000 · Closed Dec 27, 2000
Role of Insight Direct, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2000-12-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IN (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2007
CHAMA, INC. v. INSIGHT DIRECT, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 00-01514 · Filed Oct 5, 2000 · Closed Dec 20, 2001
Role of INSIGHT DIRECT, INC.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2001-12-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in DE (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2007
Omega Environmental Inc v. Insight Direct closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · No. 99-04765 · Filed Apr 23, 1999 · Closed Sep 30, 1999
Role of Omega Environmental Inc v. Insight Direct: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1999-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:11 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this issuer has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this issuer yet.

7 differences found between the filings for Insight Direct, Inc. — 2 worth asking about (compared 2 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jul 29, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Amount sold went down between filings — Insight Direct, Inc.

The Jul 29, 2009 filing says $1,300,000 sold; the Mar 12, 2010 Form D says $1,000,000 sold — $300,000 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Jul 29, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Investor count went down between filings — Insight Direct, Inc.

The Jul 29, 2009 filing reports 4 investors; the Mar 12, 2010 Form D reports 1 investor.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Note · Jul 29, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Christopher Chapman's role changed at Insight Direct, Inc.: director → executive officer

The Jul 29, 2009 filing lists Christopher Chapman as director; the Mar 12, 2010 Form D lists executive officer.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Jul 29, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Offering amount lowered between filings — Insight Direct, Inc.

The Jul 29, 2009 filing says $1,300,000 offered; the Mar 12, 2010 Form D says $1,000,000.

What this means The target raise got smaller. That can mean the plan shrank or the sponsor stopped early. Ask what changed in the deal.

Sources
Note · Jul 29, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Address moved from Waltham, MA to Boston, MA — Insight Direct, Inc.

The people listed on the Jul 29, 2009 filing give Waltham, MA; on the Mar 12, 2010 filing they give Boston, MA.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Jul 29, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Minimum investment changed between filings — Insight Direct, Inc.

The Jul 29, 2009 filing lists a minimum of $0; the Mar 12, 2010 Form D lists $1,000,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 1 offering — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 12, 2010 D
File 021-106655
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Insight Direct, Inc. in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this issuer: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Offerings (SEC Form D)

Each filing as reported by the issuer, newest first. Open a row for the full plain-English detail. D = original notice, D/A = amendment.

Offerings at a glance — 1 offering, 2 filings (one row per SEC file number)
File no.Original Form DLatest filingAmendmentsOffered (latest)Sold (latest)Industry (latest)
021-106655Mar 12, 2010 EDGAR ↗Mar 12, 2010 D EDGAR ↗1
latest Jul 29, 2009
$1,000,000$1,000,000Other Technology

Offerings are grouped by SEC file number; rows without a file number (not yet retrieved from EDGAR) are shown as their own offering until the link is fetched.

Mar 12, 2010 D Other Technology — $1,000,000 sold of $1,000,000 · 1 investors EDGAR ↗
FilingForm D filed Mar 12, 2010
SEC file no. 021-106655 · accession 0001407976-10-000002 · filing 2 of 2 in this offering
Raise progress$1,000,000 sold of $1,000,000 offered (100%) · $0 remaining · first sale Feb 25, 2010
Filing timingDate of first sale: Feb 25, 2010 · Form D filed: Mar 12, 2010 (15 days after first sale)
Rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale. Both dates are shown as reported; no conclusion is drawn.
Time since first sale6,085 days (16.7 years)
Annual amendmentsIssuer reported the offering is not expected to last more than one year. Most recent amendment for this offering in our index: Jul 29, 2009 (EDGAR ↗).
Rule: an ongoing offering generally files an amendment at least annually. Dates shown as reported; no conclusion is drawn.
Investors1 total · issuer reported no non-accredited investors
Exemption claimedRule 506 (filed before Sept 2013, when 506 was split into 506(b) and 506(c))
Minimum investment accepted$1,000,000
Securities offeredEquity
Entity detailsOrganized in DELAWARE · formed 2007 · revenue range: Decline to Disclose (state and year as reported on the issuer's latest filing)
As reported by the issuer on Form D (Items 1–2 and 5).
IndustryOther Technology
Who is paid to sell itNo sales compensation recipients listed on this filing.
Money to insidersSales commissions: $0 · Finder's fees: $0 · Proceeds to officers, directors, promoters: $0
Signed byDavid O'Connor, Chief Financial Officer (Mar 12, 2010)
Changes vs previous filing
  • total sold: $1,300,000 (Jul 29, 2009) → $1,000,000 (Mar 12, 2010)
  • total offering: $1,300,000 (Jul 29, 2009) → $1,000,000 (Mar 12, 2010)
  • investors: 4 (Jul 29, 2009) → 1 (Mar 12, 2010)
  • minimum investment: $0 as filed (no minimum reported) (Jul 29, 2009) → $1,000,000 (Mar 12, 2010)
  • date of first sale: Jan 15, 2009 (Jul 29, 2009) → Feb 25, 2010 (Mar 12, 2010)
  • securities offered: Debt; Security to be acquired upon exercise; Other: Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, which are convertible into Preferred Stock of the Issuer, which is convertible into Common Stock of the Issuer. (Jul 29, 2009) → Equity (Mar 12, 2010)
  • related persons added (Mar 12, 2010): James Koch, David O'Connor, James Triandiflou, Nim Cohen
  • related persons no longer listed (Mar 12, 2010): Vaibhav Nalwaya, Mark Kushinsky
Compared with the D/A filed Jul 29, 2009 (EDGAR ↗). Fields compared: total sold, total offering, remaining, investors, non-accredited investors (count), non-accredited investors reported, minimum investment, sales commissions, finder's fees, proceeds to insiders, date of first sale, industry, fund type, exemption, revenue range, net asset value range, securities offered, may last more than one year, related persons, sales-compensation recipients. Amendment history as filed; no conclusion is drawn.
Market contextNot computed — the exemption as filed is Rule 506 before the Sept 2013 split into 506(b) and 506(c) (see Exemption claimed); ranges are computed only for offerings claiming Rule 506(b) or 506(c), compared with the last 5 years of filings.
SourceThis filing on SEC EDGAR ↗ · retrieved from the SEC Form D bulk data set · PartnerFacts data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET
Jul 29, 2009 D/A Other Technology — $1,300,000 sold of $1,300,000 · 4 investors EDGAR ↗
FilingForm D/A (amendment) filed Jul 29, 2009 · amends a pre-2008 paper filing (EDGAR accession 9999999997-09-004418, no electronic copy)
SEC file no. 021-106655 · accession 0001407976-09-000002 · filing 1 of 2 in this offering
Raise progress$1,300,000 sold of $1,300,000 offered (100%) · $0 remaining · first sale Jan 15, 2009
Filing timingDate of first sale: Jan 15, 2009 · Original Form D filed: Mar 12, 2010 (421 days after first sale) · This amendment (Form D/A) filed: Jul 29, 2009
This row is an amendment. Rule: the original Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale; the rule sets no deadline measured from an amendment. Dates shown as reported; no conclusion is drawn.
Time since first sale6,491 days (17.8 years)
Annual amendmentsIssuer reported the offering is not expected to last more than one year. This filing is an amendment dated Jul 29, 2009. Most recent amendment for this offering in our index: this filing, Jul 29, 2009.
Rule: an ongoing offering generally files an amendment at least annually. Dates shown as reported; no conclusion is drawn.
Investors4 total · issuer reported no non-accredited investors
Exemption claimedRule 506 (filed before Sept 2013, when 506 was split into 506(b) and 506(c))
Minimum investment accepted$0 as filed (no minimum reported)
Securities offeredDebt; Security to be acquired upon exercise; Other: Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, which are convertible into Preferred Stock of the Issuer, which is convertible into Common Stock of the Issuer.
Entity detailsOrganized in DELAWARE · formed 2007 · revenue range: Decline to Disclose (state and year as reported on the issuer's latest filing)
As reported by the issuer on Form D (Items 1–2 and 5).
IndustryOther Technology
Who is paid to sell itNo sales compensation recipients listed on this filing.
Money to insidersSales commissions: $0 · Finder's fees: $0 · Proceeds to officers, directors, promoters: $0
Issuer's note: Proceeds will be used for general working capital purposes. No payments will be made to any executive officer, director or promoter in connection with this offering.
Signed byMark Kushinsky, President (Jul 29, 2009)
Changes vs previous filingPrevious filing in this offering: a pre-2008 paper filing that is not on EDGAR in electronic form. No comparison is shown.
Market contextNot computed — the exemption as filed is Rule 506 before the Sept 2013 split into 506(b) and 506(c) (see Exemption claimed); ranges are computed only for offerings claiming Rule 506(b) or 506(c), compared with the last 5 years of filings.
SourceThis filing on SEC EDGAR ↗ · retrieved from the SEC Form D bulk data set · PartnerFacts data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET
Amendment history — 1 amendment on this page, each compared with the filing before it in the same offering
Amendment filedFile no.Compared withWhat changed (both values as filed)
Jul 29, 2009 EDGAR ↗021-106655not in our indexNo comparison (previous filing not in our index)

Fields compared: total sold, total offering, remaining, investors, non-accredited investors (count), non-accredited investors reported, minimum investment, sales commissions, finder's fees, proceeds to insiders, date of first sale, industry, fund type, exemption, revenue range, net asset value range, securities offered, may last more than one year, related persons, sales-compensation recipients. Values as filed; no conclusion is drawn.

All Form D filings for this CIK on SEC EDGAR ↗. History: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment) · most recent filing Mar 12, 2010. Industry as reported, by offering: One offering, reported as Other Technology (Jul 29, 2009).

Key people 8

Officers, directors and promoters the issuer itself named on its Form D. Tap a name for every other deal they are on.

NameRelationshipAddress stateOn filings (first → last)Also listed on
CC Christopher ChapmanDirector, Executive OfficerMAJul 29, 2009 → Mar 12, 2010
on 2 of 2 filings
listed on the latest filing
—
DC David O'ConnorExecutive OfficerMAMar 12, 2010
on 1 of 2 filings
listed on the latest filing
—
JK James KochExecutive OfficerMAMar 12, 2010
on 1 of 2 filings
listed on the latest filing
—
JT James TriandiflouExecutive Officer, DirectorMAMar 12, 2010
on 1 of 2 filings
listed on the latest filing
—
JW John P. Ward
person page: John Ward
DirectorMAJul 29, 2009 → Mar 12, 2010
on 2 of 2 filings
listed on the latest filing
3 other issuers
NC Nim CohenDirectorMAMar 12, 2010
on 1 of 2 filings
listed on the latest filing
—
MK Mark KushinskyExecutive Officer, DirectorMAJul 29, 2009
on 1 of 2 filings
not listed on the latest filing (Mar 12, 2010)
—
VN Vaibhav NalwayaDirectorMAJul 29, 2009
on 1 of 2 filings
not listed on the latest filing (Mar 12, 2010)
14 other issuers

Executive officers, directors and promoters as self-reported by the issuer, one row per person. Spellings of the same name (same first and last name, or the same full name that EDGAR split differently into middle and last name) with no conflicting middle initial are shown on one row (none on this issuer); dates and counts come from the filings that list each name. Licensed persons: FINRA BrokerCheck ↗ · SEC IAPD ↗. Middle names: the SEC Form D data set (RELATEDPERSONS.tsv) repeats the previous person's middle name into later rows of the same filing; where that happened PartnerFacts shows the name without the repeated middle name and keeps the data-set spelling on record (Christopher P. Chapman; David P. O'Connor; James P. Koch; Nim P. Cohen) — the filing on EDGAR is the source.

Connections

Other issuers listing the same people:

Shared address: this business address appears on filings for 1 other issuer. Stated as a count only (suite numbers ignored) — many addresses are shared office buildings or registered agents. As of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Insight Direct, Inc..

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Insight Direct, Inc. as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Public profiles

Public profiles official links and public statements, each with its source and date

No website or social profile named in Insight Direct, Inc.'s SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #364,666 of 374,652 in line (53 issuers searched so far).

Sources searched for a website: Form C data set (issuer websites as filed), Form ADV data set (Item 1.I of matched advisers) — as of Oct 23, 2026, 11:20 PM ET: none on file for this issuer. The sponsor website, the Internet Archive and GDELT news index are read only once a site is on file; a sponsor's website comes from the issuer's own filings (Form C issuer website; EDGAR company profile), an approved profile claim, Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser, or a web search for the issuer name confirmed on the site's own homepage. We never collect personal or family accounts.

Entity standing: not checked (no official programmatic source for MA yet).

Export this report as PDF (all source links + data timestamp) · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Corrections log

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Filing-to-filing changes are in Amendment history above.

Facts from public records only, each linked to its source. No ratings, no opinions. Request a correction · Claim this profile · Facts policy

Email me the full report

The complete public-record profile for Insight Direct, Inc., plus the weekly new-filings list.

What do you want to do?

Only "Connect me" shares your details — with this sponsor, at a flat price we charge them, never tied to whether you invest. "Just researching" shares nothing.

Request a correction

Free. Tell us what's wrong and, if you can, where the correct public record is. Every request is logged with its status (received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source).

Sponsor response

Sponsors may add a sourced explanation next to any fact on this page. Reviewed before publishing; never edits the public record.

Claim this profile (sponsors)

Free. Get the "Claimed by sponsor" chip and a confirmed contact for corrections. Claiming never changes the public-record section.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (Boston, MA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.