PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:24 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

V

Vision

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Vienna, VA

Grouped because: 5 shared people, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$65Kreported sold
14investors
12Form D filings
2011–2018active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 2, 2018 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Vision is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 12 Form D filings between Jul 2011 and Mar 2018.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 7 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $65K to 14 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: "Other" (1), Other Technology (1). Issuers are based in VA (2).

What this means $65K raised across the group, about $4,643 per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Christopher Alan Mayhew (2 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter), Donald Hunt (2 issuers, director), Eckhart Grohmann (2 issuers, director), John Joseph Gaines (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Steven John Reid (2 issuers, director) and 5 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 2, 2018.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 6 court cases matching the name, 5 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 11 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 12 public filings for Vision and found 22 differences, 8 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; Investor count went down between filings; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Vision has not run yet — it is joining a line of 15,103 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

6 cases: 1 judgment, 3 dismissed, 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists v. 360 Sound and Vision, Ltd. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:13-cv-04769 · Filed Jul 10, 2013 · Closed Oct 7, 2013 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Vision, Ltd.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2013-10-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Tetra Financial Group v. Vision Imaging Products dismissed
District Court, D. Utah · No. 2:11-cv-00263 · Filed Mar 18, 2011 · Closed Oct 24, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Tetra Financial Group v. Vision Imaging Products: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-10-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in UT (not the issuer's state)
Maersk Sealand v. Vision, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 2:01-cv-00605 · Filed Aug 8, 2001 · Closed Jan 9, 2002 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Vision, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2002-01-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (VA)
Prosser v. Vision, L.P. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
District Court, S.D. Georgia · No. 6:99-cv-00032 · Filed Jan 25, 1999 · Closed Mar 19, 1999 · Nature of suit: 422 Bankruptcy appeals rule 28 USC 158
Role of Vision, L.P.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1999-03-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Microsoft Corp v. Vision Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:98-cv-01529 · Filed Mar 4, 1998 · Closed Mar 20, 1998
Role of Vision Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1998-03-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Moon v. Vision Limited closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:93-cv-02319 · Filed Nov 26, 1993 · Closed Jan 31, 1994
Role of Vision Limited: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1994-01-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2011
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Vision..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

5 cases: 1 open, 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Vision III Imaging, Inc. open
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 23-11889 · Filed Nov 17, 2023
Role of Vision III Imaging, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the issuer's state (VA)
Vision Ltd. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 11-15329 · Filed Nov 17, 2011 · Closed Jun 4, 2012
Role of Vision Ltd.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2012-06-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Marcal Paper Mills, Inc., by and through the Offic v. Vision, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 08-02911 · Filed Nov 30, 2008 · Closed Dec 18, 2009
Role of Vision, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2009-12-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
Valley Media, Inc. v. Sound And Vision, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 02-02008 · Filed Feb 22, 2002 · Closed Mar 11, 2002
Role of Vision, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2002-03-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Vision L.p. v. Prosser closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vision)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · No. 98-06014 · Filed Jun 2, 1998 · Closed Apr 19, 1999
Role of Vision L.p.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 1999-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

22 differences found between the filings for Vision — 8 worth asking about (compared 12 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Dec 29, 2015 – Jun 13, 2016

Amount sold went down between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The Dec 29, 2015 filing says $393,000 sold; the Jun 13, 2016 Form D/A says $0 sold — $393,000 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · May 14, 2015 – Nov 17, 2015

Amount sold went down between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The May 14, 2015 filing says $80,000 sold; the Nov 17, 2015 Form D/A says $0 sold — $80,000 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Jul 1, 2011 – Aug 8, 2012

Amount sold went down between filings — VISION III IMAGING INC

The Jul 1, 2011 filing says $70,000 sold; the Aug 8, 2012 Form D/A says $65,000 sold — $5,000 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Dec 29, 2015 – Jun 13, 2016

Investor count went down between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The Dec 29, 2015 filing reports 14 investors; the Jun 13, 2016 Form D/A reports 0 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · May 14, 2015 – Nov 17, 2015

Investor count went down between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The May 14, 2015 filing reports 5 investors; the Nov 17, 2015 Form D/A reports 0 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Aug 16, 2017 – Dec 11, 2017

Form D filed 117 days after the first sale — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Aug 16, 2017. The Form D was filed Dec 11, 2017 — 117 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 102 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · May 14, 2015 – Jun 13, 2016

4 people are no longer listed on a later amendment

Eckhart Grohmann is no longer listed on the Jun 13, 2016 amendment — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · W. Lawrence Patrick is no longer listed on the Jun 13, 2016 amendment — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · Cynthia Traeger is no longer listed on the Jun 13, 2016 amendment — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · Donald Hunt is no longer listed on the Nov 17, 2015 amendment — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

What this means People leave; the issuer lists only current officers, directors and promoters. Ask why and who replaced them.

Sources
Worth asking · Jul 1, 2011 – Nov 7, 2014

2 separate companies in this group use the same name: "VISION III IMAGING INC"

CIK 856685 (first filed Jul 1, 2011, Vienna, VA); CIK 1624360 (first filed Nov 7, 2014, Reston, VA).

What this means Two legal entities with one name can make it unclear which one you invested in. Match the CIK and the SEC file number on your documents, not just the name.

Sources
Note · Apr 4, 2015 – May 14, 2015

Form D filed 40 days after the first sale — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Apr 4, 2015. The Form D was filed May 14, 2015 — 40 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 25 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Dec 29, 2016 – Dec 11, 2017

Christopher Alan Mayhew's role changed at Vision III Imaging, Inc.: executive officer → executive officer, director, promoter

The Dec 29, 2016 filing lists Christopher Alan Mayhew as executive officer; the Dec 11, 2017 Form D lists executive officer, director, promoter.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Jun 13, 2016 – Dec 29, 2016

Christopher Alan Mayhew's role changed at Vision III Imaging, Inc.: executive officer, director, promoter → executive officer

The Jun 13, 2016 filing lists Christopher Alan Mayhew as executive officer, director, promoter; the Dec 29, 2016 Form D lists executive officer.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Dec 23, 2014 – May 12, 2015

John Joseph Gaines's role changed at Vision III Imaging, Inc.: director → executive officer, director

The Dec 23, 2014 filing lists John Joseph Gaines as director; the May 12, 2015 Form D lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Jul 1, 2011 – Jun 13, 2016

5 offerings changed their target amount between filings

Offering amount changed between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · Offering amount lowered between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · Offering amount changed between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · Offering amount lowered between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc. · Offering amount lowered between filings — VISION III IMAGING INC

What this means Targets change as deals grow or shrink. Ask whether later money has the same terms.

Sources
Note · Jun 24, 2011 – Dec 11, 2017

5 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Vision III Imaging, Inc. (latest filing Dec 11, 2017) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Vision III Imaging, Inc. (latest filing Dec 29, 2016) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Vision III Imaging, Inc. (latest filing Jun 13, 2016) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Vision III Imaging, Inc. (latest filing Dec 23, 2014) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — VISION III IMAGING INC (latest filing Aug 8, 2012)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Note · Jun 13, 2016 – Dec 29, 2016

Lon Frederick is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Lon Paul Frederick" on the Jun 13, 2016 filing, and "Lon Frederick" on the Dec 29, 2016 filing.

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Dec 29, 2016 – Dec 11, 2017

Address moved from Pewaukee, WI to Reston, VA — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The people listed on the Dec 29, 2016 filing give Pewaukee, WI; on the Dec 11, 2017 filing they give Reston, VA.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Dec 29, 2015 – Jun 13, 2016

Address moved from Reston, VA to Pewaukee, WI — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The people listed on the Dec 29, 2015 filing give Reston, VA; on the Jun 13, 2016 filing they give Pewaukee, WI.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · May 14, 2015 – Nov 17, 2015

Address moved from Chicago, IL to Reston, VA — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The people listed on the May 14, 2015 filing give Chicago, IL; on the Nov 17, 2015 filing they give Reston, VA.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Dec 29, 2015 – Jun 13, 2016

Minimum investment changed between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The Dec 29, 2015 filing lists a minimum of $10,000; the Jun 13, 2016 Form D/A lists $30,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
Note · Nov 17, 2015 – Dec 29, 2015

Minimum investment changed between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The Nov 17, 2015 filing lists a minimum of $1,500,012; the Dec 29, 2015 Form D/A lists $10,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
Note · May 14, 2015 – Nov 17, 2015

Minimum investment changed between filings — Vision III Imaging, Inc.

The May 14, 2015 filing lists a minimum of $10,000; the Nov 17, 2015 Form D/A lists $1,500,012.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
Note · Jul 1, 2011 – Aug 8, 2012

Minimum investment changed between filings — VISION III IMAGING INC

The Jul 1, 2011 filing lists a minimum of $250; the Aug 8, 2012 Form D/A lists $0.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

4 of 7 offerings report sales commissions totalling $792,000; 0 report finder's fees; 7 report proceeds to related persons totalling $3,275,000. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 2, 2018 D
Vision III Imaging, Inc.
File 021-306860
$250,000$0$200,000Frederick & Company, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 333 ↗EDGAR ↗
Dec 11, 2017 D
Vision III Imaging, Inc.
File 021-300419
$0$0$50,000None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 29, 2016 D
Vision III Imaging, Inc.
File 021-277264
$0$0$100,000None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 13, 2016 D/A
Vision III Imaging, Inc.
File 021-239803
$262,000 (est.)$0$1,300,000 (est.)
$1 Million to retire promissory note debt held by directors and other note holders, and approximately $300,000 fixed salaries to Officers.
Frederick & Company, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 333 ↗
Brokerbank Securities, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 130116 ↗
EDGAR ↗
May 12, 2015 D
Vision III Imaging, Inc.
File 021-239635
$230,000 (est.)$0$1,500,000 (est.)
$1.2 million to retire debt held by directors and $300,000 for salaries to officers.
Frederick & Company, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 333 ↗
Brokerbank Securities, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 130116 ↗
EDGAR ↗
Dec 23, 2014 D/A
Vision III Imaging, Inc.
File 021-227926
$50,000 (est.)$0$100,000 (est.)Frederick & Company, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 333 ↗
Brokerbank Securities, Inc. BrokerCheck CRD 130116 ↗
EDGAR ↗
Aug 8, 2012 D/A
VISION III IMAGING INC
File 021-162170
$0$0$25,000 (est.)
Salary to CEO - $15,000; Loan payback to Director - $10,000
Lon P. Frederick BrokerCheck CRD 848127 ↗
via Frederick & COmpany, Inc. (CRD 333 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Vision in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗VI VISION III IMAGING INCshared people, similar issuer namesVIENNA, VAOther2$70,0000No minimum reported2011–2012
EDGAR ↗VI Vision III Imaging, Inc.shared people, similar issuer namesReston, VAOther Technology10$393,000
offering $2,500,000 · similar: $1,000,000–$10,000,000
14
similar: 1–11
$30,000
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2014–2018

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other Technology / 506(c) (805 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 2, 2018Vision III Imaging, Inc.DOther Technology$2,500,000$0
EDGAR ↗Dec 11, 2017Vision III Imaging, Inc.DOther Technology$350,000$130,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 29, 2016Vision III Imaging, Inc.DOther Technology$1,000,000$14,000
EDGAR ↗Jun 13, 2016Vision III Imaging, Inc.D/AOther Technology$5,250,000$0
EDGAR ↗Dec 29, 2015Vision III Imaging, Inc.D/AOther Technology$600,000$393,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 17, 2015Vision III Imaging, Inc.D/AOther Technology$5,250,000$0
EDGAR ↗May 14, 2015Vision III Imaging, Inc.DOther Technology$350,000$80,000
EDGAR ↗May 12, 2015Vision III Imaging, Inc.DOther Technology$5,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Dec 23, 2014Vision III Imaging, Inc.D/AOther Technology$42,000$0
EDGAR ↗Nov 7, 2014Vision III Imaging, Inc.DOther Technology$500,000$0
EDGAR ↗Aug 8, 2012VISION III IMAGING INCD/AOther$200,000$65,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 1, 2011VISION III IMAGING INCDOther$600,000$70,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 2, 2018. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other (2011). Latest offering: Other Technology (2014–2018; most recent Mar 2, 2018).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
CM Christopher Alan MayhewExecutive Officer, Director, Promoter2Jul 1, 2011 → Mar 2, 2018
JG John Joseph GainesDirector, Executive Officer2Jul 1, 2011 → Jun 13, 2016
SR Steven John ReidDirector2Jul 1, 2011 → Jun 13, 2016
EG Eckhart GrohmannDirector2Jul 1, 2011 → Dec 29, 2015
DH Donald HuntDirector2Jul 1, 2011 → May 14, 2015
LF Lon FrederickDirector1Jun 13, 2016 → Dec 29, 2016
BB Billy J. BinghamDirector1Nov 7, 2014 → Dec 29, 2016
JG Johh GainesDirector1Dec 29, 2016 → Dec 29, 2016
WP W. Lawrence PatrickDirector1Nov 7, 2014 → Dec 29, 2015
CT Cynthia TraegerDirector1Nov 17, 2015 → Dec 29, 2015

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Vision.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Vision as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Vision's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #258,802 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: VIENNA), VA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.