PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:33 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

V

Vesta

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Fairfax, CA

Grouped because: 2 shared people, same business address (2 issuers), similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$11.1Mreported sold
24investors
4Form D filings
2021–2026active
1new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jul 1, 2026 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Vesta is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 4 Form D filings between Mar 2021 and Jul 2026.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 5 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $11.1M to 24 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2), Other Real Estate (1). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $11.1M raised across the group, about $461K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Clayton Wyatt (3 issuers, executive officer and promoter), Rich Ford (2 issuers, promoter), Douglas Neal (1 issuer, executive officer), Richard Ford (1 issuer, executive officer), Vesta Ventures GP II, LLC (1 issuer, executive officer, entity) and 1 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 1 new offering in the last 12 months; latest filing Jul 1, 2026.

What this means still raising money this year.

Adviser registration (Form ADV) on record: VESTA VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 5 court cases matching the name, 5 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 10 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 4 public filings for Vesta and found 3 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 134 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Vesta has not run yet — it is joining a line of 18,458 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

5 cases: 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 2 dismissed

Pearson v. Vesta Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 1:24-cv-01196 · Filed Jul 15, 2024 · Closed Apr 8, 2025
Role of Vesta Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2025-04-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
CAPITOL SERVICES MANAGEMENT INC. v. VESTA CORPORATION closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:17-cv-01756 · Filed Aug 28, 2017 · Closed Jul 25, 2018 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of VESTA CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2018-07-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state); filed 2017, issuer incorporated 2021
Vesta Corporation v. Amdocs Management Limited dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
District Court, D. Oregon · No. 3:14-cv-01142 · Filed Jul 17, 2014 · Closed Nov 14, 2018 · Nature of suit: 370 Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Role of Vesta Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2018-11-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OR (not the issuer's state); filed 2014, issuer incorporated 2021
Patricia T. Lee v. Vesta, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 8:02-cv-02403 · Filed Jul 19, 2002 · Closed May 11, 2005
Role of Vesta, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-05-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MD (not the issuer's state); filed 2002, issuer incorporated 2021
SIMPSON, EDDIE W v. VESTA INC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:92-cv-01466 · Filed Oct 21, 1992 · Closed Jan 28, 1993 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of VESTA INC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1993-01-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IN (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2021
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Vesta..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

5 cases: 5 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

AmeriNet, LLC Creditors' Trust v. Vesta Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:10-ap-00915 · Filed Jul 23, 2010 · Closed Mar 26, 2013
Role of Vesta Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2013-03-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 2010, issuer incorporated 2021
Vesta Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 07-54076 · Filed Dec 7, 2007 · Closed Mar 25, 2009
Role of Vesta Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2009-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (CA); filed 2007, issuer incorporated 2021
Oberlin Farms Dairy, Inc. v. Vesta Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 93-05052 · Filed Apr 26, 1993 · Closed Aug 10, 1993
Role of Vesta Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1993-08-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OH (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2021
Vesta Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 93-50216 · Filed Feb 5, 1993 · Closed Sep 20, 1995
Role of Vesta Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1995-09-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OH (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2021
PETER J. SCHMITT CO., INC. v. VESTA CORPORATION closed matched at sponsor-group level (Vesta)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 92-00104 · Filed Aug 21, 1992 · Closed Apr 1, 1998
Role of VESTA CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1998-04-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DE (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2021
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

3 differences found between the filings for Vesta — 1 worth asking about (compared 4 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Feb 10, 2022 – Jun 24, 2022

Form D filed 134 days after the first sale — Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Feb 10, 2022. The Form D was filed Jun 24, 2022 — 134 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 119 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Jan 31, 2024 – Feb 14, 2024

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLC (latest filing Feb 14, 2024)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Feb 14, 2024 (first sale Jan 31, 2024). It reports $320,250 sold of $353,500 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Feb 24, 2021 – Mar 11, 2021

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Vesta Ventures Fund I, LP (latest filing Mar 11, 2021)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 11, 2021 (first sale Feb 24, 2021). It reports $750,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 4 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 2 report proceeds to related persons totalling $1,965,000. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jul 1, 2026 D
Vesta Ventures Fund II, LP
File 021-589212
$0$0$1,800,000 (est.)
Issuer is obligated to pay a management fee to the General Partner of the Issuer or its affiliate.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 14, 2024 D
Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLC
File 021-505320
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 24, 2022 D
Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLC
File 021-450191
$0$0$165,000None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 11, 2021 D
Vesta Ventures Fund I, LP
File 021-391879
$0$0$0 (est.)
Issuer is obligated to pay a management fee to the General Partner or its designee.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Vesta in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗VV Vesta Ventures Fund I, LPshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesFAIRFAX, CAPooled Investment Fund1$750,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
2
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2021–2021
EDGAR ↗HC Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLCshared people, same business addressFAIRFAX, CAOther Real Estate2$5,050,000
offering $353,500 · similar: $2,250,000–$16,950,000
20
similar: 5–32
$7,000
similar: $15,000–$100,000
2022–2024
EDGAR ↗VV Vesta Ventures Fund II, LPshared people, similar issuer namesENCINITAS, CAPooled Investment Fund1$10,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
2
similar: 4–27
$5,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2026–2026

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); Other Real Estate / 506(b) (5,033 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jul 1, 2026Vesta Ventures Fund II, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$10,000,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 14, 2024Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLCDOther Real Estate$353,500$320,250
EDGAR ↗Jun 24, 2022Home Collection CLT Investment I, LLCDOther Real Estate$5,050,000$5,050,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 11, 2021Vesta Ventures Fund I, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$750,000

Activity: 1 new offering in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jul 1, 2026. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Pooled Investment Fund (2021), Other Real Estate (2022–2024). Latest offering: Pooled Investment Fund (Jul 1, 2026).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
CW Clayton WyattPromoter, Executive Officer3Mar 11, 2021 → Jul 1, 2026
RF Rich FordPromoter2Mar 11, 2021 → Jul 1, 2026
VV Vesta Ventures Management, LLC entityPromoter1Jul 1, 2026 → Jul 1, 2026
VV Vesta Ventures GP II, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Jul 1, 2026 → Jul 1, 2026
DN Douglas NealExecutive Officer1Jun 24, 2022 → Feb 14, 2024
RF Richard FordExecutive Officer1Jun 24, 2022 → Feb 14, 2024

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

VESTA VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC — Exempt reporting adviser · SEC registration status as reported: “ERA - Active” since Aug 17, 2026 · SEC file 802-137314 · Main office: ENCINITAS, CA · IAPD record ↗ · Form ADV filing (PDF) ↗

Regulatory assets under management: Not reported — exempt reporting advisers do not complete Form ADV Item 5.

Websites listed on Form ADV (Item 1.I): www.vestavc.com ↗

Item 11 disclosure questions as answered on Form ADV filed Aug 17, 2026: 0 of 24 answered “Yes”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11 asks: “Do any of the events below involve you or any of your supervised persons?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(1) asks: “A. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(2) asks: “A. (2) been charged with any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(1) asks: “B. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to a misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related business, or any fraud, false statements, or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(2) asks: “B. (2) been charged with a misdemeanor listed in Item 11.B(1)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(1) asks: “C. Has the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(2) asks: “C. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(3) asks: “C. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(4) asks: “C. (4) entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(5) asks: “C. (5) imposed a civil money penalty on you or any advisory affiliate, or ordered you or any advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(1) asks: “D. Has any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority: (1) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission, or been dishonest, unfair, or unethical?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(2) asks: “D. (2) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(3) asks: “D. (3) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(4) asks: “D. (4) in the past ten years, entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(5) asks: “D. (5) ever denied, suspended, or revoked your or any advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented you or any advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted your or any advisory affiliate's activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(1) asks: “E. Has any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(2) asks: “E. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(3) asks: “E. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been the cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(4) asks: “E. (4) disciplined you or any advisory affiliate by expelling or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from membership, barring or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from association with other members, or otherwise restricting your or the advisory affiliate's activities?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11F asks: “F. Has an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or any advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11G asks: “G. Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any regulatory proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.C., 11.D., or 11.E.?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(a) asks: “H. (1) Has any domestic or foreign court: (a) in the past ten years, enjoined you or any advisory affiliate in connection with any investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(b) asks: “H. (1)(b) ever found that you or any advisory affiliate were involved in a violation of investment-related statutes or regulations?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(c) asks: “H. (1)(c) ever dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or any advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(2) asks: “H. (2) Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H(1)?”

Answers as filed by the adviser on Form ADV Part 1A, Item 11; question text quoted from the form. Details of each “Yes” are in the Disclosure Reporting Pages of the Form ADV (PDF) ↗.

Matched on management entity listed on Form D = adviser name, business address on Form ADV = address on Form D · Form ADV data: SEC Investment Adviser Information Report (exempt reporting advisers), file dated 2026-10-02, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:39 PM ET · IAPD record last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:36 PM ET

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Vesta as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Vesta's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #20,470 of 374,652 in line (18 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: FAIRFAX), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.