PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 3:50 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

UI

Us Innovative Technology

One sponsor team, 7 deal companies · Coraopolis, PA

Grouped because: 1 shared person, 2 shared management entities, same business address (7 issuers), similar issuer names (7) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

7deal companies
$4.37Breported sold
43investors
16Form D filings
2022–2026active
3new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Oct 15, 2026 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: not yet

The short version

Us Innovative Technology is a sponsor group of 7 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 16 Form D filings between Nov 2022 and Oct 2026.

What this means One team, 7 deal companies, about 4 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $4.37B to 43 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (7). Issuers are based in PA (7).

What this means $4.37B raised across the group, about $101.7M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Thomas Tull (7 issuers, executive officer), US Innovative Technology GP II, LLC (3 issuers, executive officer, entity), US Innovative Technology GP, LLC (3 issuers, executive officer, entity) and US Innovative Technology GP X, LLC (1 issuer, executive officer, entity).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 3 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Oct 15, 2026.

What this means Busy — still raising money this year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 11 court cases matching the name, 14 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below. Not yet searched: SEC enforcement releases.

What this means 25 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

What the community is saying

Nothing found on Reddit, BiggerPockets or community forums for high-net-worth investors (searched Oct 24, 2026) — search queued; this line updates when it has run.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

11 cases: 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 5 dismissed, 1 judgment, 1 open

inMusic Brands, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 2:22-cv-02670 · Filed May 9, 2022 · Closed Sep 15, 2022
Role of inMusic Brands, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2022-09-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Holdings, LLC v. Demand Electric, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:20-cv-03273 · Filed Apr 27, 2020 · Closed Jul 16, 2020 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332oc Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Innovative Technology Holdings, LLC v. Demand Electric, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-07-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC v. DEMAND ELECTRIC, INC. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:19-cv-06160 · Filed Dec 20, 2019 · Closed Apr 23, 2020 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC v. DEMAND ELECTRIC, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-04-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the group's state (PA)
Innovative Technology Electronics Corp. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 2:13-cv-03363 · Filed Jun 12, 2013 · Closed Mar 10, 2015 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Innovative Technology Electronics Corp. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-03-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:11-mc-00433 · Filed Dec 16, 2011 · Closed Feb 28, 2012
Role of Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-02-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Juniper Strategy, LLC v. Innovative Technology Application, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 8:11-cv-02091 · Filed Jul 29, 2011 · Closed Sep 13, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Juniper Strategy, LLC v. Innovative Technology Application, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-09-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:11-cv-02135 · Filed Apr 29, 2011 · Closed Oct 12, 2012 · Nature of suit: 196 Franchise · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:11-cv-01371 · Filed Mar 10, 2011 · Closed Apr 26, 2011 · Nature of suit: 196 Contract: Franchise · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-04-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:11-cv-01043 · Filed Mar 7, 2011 · Closed Oct 12, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Cobalt Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, Corp. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:07-cv-07944 · Filed Sep 10, 2007 · Closed Mar 31, 2008 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions · Cause: 28:1332bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Cobalt Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Brookstone Company, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:18-cv-03891 · Filed —
Role of Brookstone Company, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC: Party · Outcome: Pending — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts; live RECAP re-check pending. State courts: not yet searched. PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not yet searched. No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

Not yet searched

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — not yet searched.

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states: not yet searched.

No SEC search has run yet for this sponsor group.

3. Bankruptcies

14 cases: 14 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Kmart Holding Corporation v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 20-06930 · Filed Oct 13, 2020 · Closed Sep 2, 2021
Role of Kmart Holding Corporation v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-09-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Business Park, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 10-91022 · Filed Mar 22, 2010 · Closed May 5, 2011
Role of Innovative Technology Business Park, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-05-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Linens Holding Co. v. Innovative Technology Electrics L/C closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 09-51239 · Filed Jul 1, 2009 · Closed May 11, 2010
Role of Linens Holding Co. v. Innovative Technology Electrics L/C: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-05-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology of Destin, Inc. v. Holley closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:07-ap-00299 · Filed Aug 3, 2007 · Closed May 13, 2010
Role of Innovative Technology of Destin, Inc. v. Holley: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-05-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Application, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 07-11324 · Filed May 24, 2007 · Closed Apr 19, 2010
Role of Innovative Technology Application, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
EDMONDSON v. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. 3:03-ap-00040 · Filed Jan 21, 2003 · Closed Feb 27, 2004
Role of EDMONDSON v. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-02-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
Futurelink Madison Corporation v. Innovative Technology Solutions LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 02-02523 · Filed Jun 6, 2002 · Closed Sep 18, 2002
Role of Futurelink Madison Corporation v. Innovative Technology Solutions LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Business Innovative Technology Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · No. 8-00-87937 · Filed Dec 5, 2000 · Closed Jan 16, 2001
Role of Business Innovative Technology Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-01-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Frazer v. Innovative Technology Prod Llc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 2:99-ap-03290 · Filed Dec 7, 1999 · Closed Apr 24, 2001
Role of Frazer v. Innovative Technology Prod Llc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-04-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology, Ltd. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 96-16281 · Filed Aug 16, 1996 · Closed Feb 14, 1997
Role of Innovative Technology, Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-02-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 94-01861 · Filed Oct 12, 1994 · Closed Feb 15, 1996
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-02-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 94-01821 · Filed Sep 20, 1994 · Closed Jan 10, 1995
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1995-01-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 94-14326 · Filed Aug 15, 1994 · Closed Sep 15, 1999
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1999-09-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Us Innovative Technology)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 92-15129 · Filed Sep 2, 1992 · Closed Sep 30, 1992
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not yet searched. PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not yet searched. No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 7 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Oct 15, 2026 D
USIT HPC, LP
File 021-601359
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 24, 2026 D
USIT AC I, LP
File 021-595150
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 19, 2026 D/A
US Innovative Technology Fund, LP
File 021-464818
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 19, 2026 D/A
US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund, LP
File 021-492415
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 19, 2026 D/A
US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund II, LP
File 021-551455
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 19, 2026 D/A
US Innovative Technology Fund II, LP
File 021-557153
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 19, 2026 D/A
USIT II LC I, LP
File 021-566042
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 7 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookups queued

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Us Innovative Technology in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Not yet searched for this group (queued): NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not yet searched). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not yet searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗UI US Innovative Technology Fund, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund4$1,537,875,000
offering $1,537,875,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
23
similar: 4–27
$10,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2022–2026
EDGAR ↗UI US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund2$750,000,000
offering $750,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
1
similar: 4–27
$10,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2023–2026
EDGAR ↗UI US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund II, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund3$1,395,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
1
similar: 4–27
$10,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2025–2026
EDGAR ↗UI US Innovative Technology Fund II, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund3$476,506,250
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
6
similar: 4–27
$10,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2025–2026
EDGAR ↗UL USIT II LC I, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund2$11,590,236
offering $11,590,236 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
4
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2025–2026
EDGAR ↗UA USIT AC I, LPshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund1$2,567,807
offering $2,567,807 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
6
similar: 4–27
$30,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2026–2026
EDGAR ↗UH USIT HPC, LPshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesCORAOPOLIS, PAPooled Investment Fund1$200,500,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
2
similar: 4–27
$200,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2026–2026

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Oct 15, 2026USIT HPC, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$200,500,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 24, 2026USIT AC I, LPDPooled Investment Fund$2,567,807$2,567,807
EDGAR ↗Aug 19, 2026USIT II LC I, LPD/APooled Investment Fund$11,590,236$11,590,236
EDGAR ↗Aug 19, 2026US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund II, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,395,000,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 19, 2026US Innovative Technology Fund II, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$476,506,250
EDGAR ↗Aug 19, 2026US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund, LPD/APooled Investment Fund$750,000,000$750,000,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 19, 2026US Innovative Technology Fund, LPD/APooled Investment Fund$1,537,875,000$1,537,875,000
EDGAR ↗Apr 13, 2026US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund II, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,110,000,000
EDGAR ↗Apr 13, 2026US Innovative Technology Fund II, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$47,000,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 8, 2025USIT II LC I, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$11,590,236
EDGAR ↗Sep 10, 2025US Innovative Technology Fund II, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$37,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 11, 2025US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund II, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,000,000,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 9, 2023US Innovative Technology Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,527,650,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 19, 2023US Innovative Technology Parallel Fund, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$250,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 23, 2023US Innovative Technology Fund, LPD/APooled Investment Fund$5,000,000,000$1,423,650,000
EDGAR ↗Nov 15, 2022US Innovative Technology Fund, LPDPooled Investment Fund$5,000,000,000$1,347,000,000

Activity: 3 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Oct 15, 2026. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 7 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2022–2026).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
TT Thomas TullExecutive Officer7Nov 15, 2022 → Oct 15, 2026
UI US Innovative Technology GP, LLC entityExecutive Officer3Nov 15, 2022 → Aug 24, 2026
UI US Innovative Technology GP II, LLC entityExecutive Officer3Jul 11, 2025 → Aug 19, 2026
UI US Innovative Technology GP X, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 15, 2026

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Not yet searched. Sources to be searched: SEC Investment Adviser Information Reports — Form ADV data for SEC-registered advisers and exempt reporting advisers (file dated 2026-10-02); SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) firm search — registered and exempt reporting advisers · Search queued. Results are added automatically; check back later.

Meta advertising

Meta advertising Meta Pixel and page links found on the sponsor's own site; ads from Meta's Ad Library where the API returns them

Not yet searched.

Sources to be searched: the sponsor's website (none on record yet; a sponsor's website is known only from the issuer's own filings (Form C issuer website; EDGAR company profile), an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser — we never look it up elsewhere) for Meta Pixel ids and Facebook / Instagram page links; Meta Ad Library API: not yet searched (API access pending). We never read facebook.com or instagram.com; readers get a link to Meta's public Ad Library instead.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

None found in sources searched.

Sources searched: SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 · Last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET.

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: CORAOPOLIS), PA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗Pennsylvania UJS portal case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

Pennsylvania Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗