PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 4:59 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

GB

Gold Bull

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (as filed: A1)

Grouped because: 2 shared people, same business address (2 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$635Kreported sold
31investors
4Form D filings
2017–2024active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 15, 2024 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Gold Bull is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 4 Form D filings between Dec 2017 and Mar 2024.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 7 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $635K to 31 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: "Other" (2). Issuers are based in British Columbia, Canada (as filed: A1) (2).

What this means $635K raised across the group, about $20K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Gavin Cooper (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Vince Sorace (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Cherie Ledeen (1 issuer, executive officer and director), Craig Parry (1 issuer, director), James E. Yates (1 issuer, director) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 15, 2024.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 4 court cases matching the name, 4 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 8 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 4 public filings for Gold Bull and found 4 differences: Form D filed 23 days after the first sale; Form D filed 18 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Gold Bull has not run yet — it is joining a line of 3,479 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 27 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

4 cases: 1 open, 2 judgment, 1 dismissed

AudienceView Ticketing Corporation v. Desert Star Theatrics Inc. open
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:26-cv-05677 · Filed Jul 3, 2026 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of AudienceView Ticketing Corporation v. Desert Star Theatrics Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Fresh Direct Inc v. Desert Star Produce LLC judgment
District Court, C.D. California · No. 5:09-cv-02217 · Filed Dec 3, 2009 · Closed May 24, 2010 · Nature of suit: Agriculture Acts · Cause: 28:1441 Notice of Removal
Role of Fresh Direct Inc v. Desert Star Produce LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2010-05-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER v. ESI BH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dismissed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. · Filed Oct 20, 1993 · Closed May 11, 1995 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER v. ESI BH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1995-05-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
Desert Star Sales Co v. Delta Faucet Co Inc judgment
District Court, D. New Mexico · No. 1:92-cv-00358 · Filed Apr 7, 1992 · Closed May 13, 1993 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Desert Star Sales Co v. Delta Faucet Co Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1993-05-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NM (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Gold Bull..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

4 cases: 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

WILSON v. Desert Star Homeowners Association closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:14-ap-00920 · Filed Nov 7, 2014 · Closed Jul 27, 2015
Role of WILSON v. Desert Star Homeowners Association: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-07-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
Desert Star Communities II LP closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:07-bk-11209 · Filed Apr 26, 2007 · Closed Dec 27, 2007
Role of Desert Star Communities II LP: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-12-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
PCT v. Desert Star Transportation L.C. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 05-75588 · Filed Mar 7, 2005 · Closed May 9, 2005
Role of PCT v. Desert Star Transportation L.C.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-05-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Kmart Corporation v. Hi Desert Star closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 04-02181 · Filed Jan 26, 2004 · Closed Mar 30, 2005
Role of Kmart Corporation v. Hi Desert Star: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-03-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

4 differences found between the filings for Gold Bull (compared 4 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Nov 22, 2021 – Dec 15, 2021

Form D filed 23 days after the first sale — Gold Bull Resources Corp.

The filing says the first sale was Nov 22, 2021. The Form D was filed Dec 15, 2021 — 23 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 8 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Nov 19, 2020 – Dec 7, 2020

Form D filed 18 days after the first sale — Gold Bull Resources Corp.

The filing says the first sale was Nov 19, 2020. The Form D was filed Dec 7, 2020 — 18 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 3 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Dec 8, 2017 – Mar 15, 2024

4 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Gold Bull Resources Corp. (latest filing Mar 15, 2024) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Gold Bull Resources Corp. (latest filing Dec 15, 2021) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Gold Bull Resources Corp. (latest filing Dec 7, 2020) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Desert Star Holdings Corp. (latest filing Dec 14, 2017)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Note · Dec 7, 2020 – Mar 15, 2024

Issuer used a different name before — Gold Bull Resources Corp.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Alternative Earth Resources Inc.; Black Sea Copper & Gold Corp.; QX Metals Corp.; Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. The current name on file is "Gold Bull Resources Corp.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

1 of 4 offerings reports sales commissions totalling $4,586; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 15, 2024 D
Gold Bull Resources Corp.
File 021-507712
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 15, 2021 D
Gold Bull Resources Corp.
File 021-425183
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 7, 2020 D
Gold Bull Resources Corp.
File 021-382411
$4,586 (est.)$0$0Canaccord Genuity Corp. no CRD number reported
via Canaccord Genuity LLC (CRD 1020 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
Dec 14, 2017 D
Desert Star Holdings Corp.
File 021-300685
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Gold Bull in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗DS Desert Star Holdings Corp.shared people, same business addressVANCOUVER, British Columbia, Canada (as filed: A1)Other1$540,170
offering $955,684 · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
26
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2017–2017
EDGAR ↗GB Gold Bull Resources Corp.shared people, same business addressVANCOUVER, British Columbia, Canada (as filed: A1)Other3$449,527
offering $235,825 · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
5
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2020–2024

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other / 506(b) (18,678 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 15, 2024Gold Bull Resources Corp.DOther$235,825$95,034
EDGAR ↗Dec 15, 2021Gold Bull Resources Corp.DOther$786,672$449,527
EDGAR ↗Dec 7, 2020Gold Bull Resources Corp.DOther$133,761$76,435
EDGAR ↗Dec 14, 2017Desert Star Holdings Corp.DOther$955,684$540,170

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 15, 2024. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 4 offerings reported: Other (2017–2024).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
GC Gavin CooperExecutive Officer, Director2Dec 14, 2017 → Mar 15, 2024
VS Vince SoraceExecutive Officer, Director2Dec 14, 2017 → Dec 15, 2021
JH Jennifer HansonExecutive Officer1Mar 15, 2024 → Mar 15, 2024
CP Craig ParryDirector1Dec 7, 2020 → Mar 15, 2024
WC Walter ColesDirector1Dec 7, 2020 → Mar 15, 2024
CL Cherie LedeenExecutive Officer, Director1Dec 7, 2020 → Mar 15, 2024
MC Michael CowinDirector1Dec 15, 2021 → Mar 15, 2024
JY James E. YatesDirector1Dec 7, 2020 → Dec 7, 2020

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Gold Bull.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Gold Bull as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Gold Bull's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #263,036 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: VANCOUVER), A1). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Business registries