PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:21 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

I

Innovative

One sponsor team, 4 deal companies · Coconut Creek, FL

Grouped because: 1 shared person, same business address (4 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

4deal companies
$0reported sold
0investors
5Form D filings
2010–2012active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Nov 27, 2012 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Innovative is a sponsor group of 4 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 5 Form D filings between May 2010 and Nov 2012.

What this means One team, 4 deal companies, about 2 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $0 (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Other Technology (2), "Other" (1), Other Energy (1). Issuers are based in FL (4).

What this means $0 raised across the group. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: David Loron Frank (4 issuers, executive officer).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Nov 27, 2012.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 13 court cases matching the name, 16 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 29 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 5 public filings for Innovative and found 4 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Executive; Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Company Executive; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Innovative has not run yet — it is joining a line of 13,647 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

13 cases: 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 7 dismissed, 1 judgment, 1 open

inMusic Brands, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC closed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 2:22-cv-02670 · Filed May 9, 2022 · Closed Sep 15, 2022
Role of inMusic Brands, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2022-09-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Holdings, LLC v. Demand Electric, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:20-cv-03273 · Filed Apr 27, 2020 · Closed Jul 16, 2020 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332oc Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Innovative Technology Holdings, LLC v. Demand Electric, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-07-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC v. DEMAND ELECTRIC, INC. closed
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:19-cv-06160 · Filed Dec 20, 2019 · Closed Apr 23, 2020 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC v. DEMAND ELECTRIC, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2020-04-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Electronics Corp. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. dismissed
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 2:13-cv-03363 · Filed Jun 12, 2013 · Closed Mar 10, 2015 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Innovative Technology Electronics Corp. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-03-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:11-mc-00433 · Filed Dec 16, 2011 · Closed Feb 28, 2012
Role of Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-02-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Juniper Strategy, LLC v. Innovative Technology Application, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 8:11-cv-02091 · Filed Jul 29, 2011 · Closed Sep 13, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Juniper Strategy, LLC v. Innovative Technology Application, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-09-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:11-cv-02135 · Filed Apr 29, 2011 · Closed Oct 12, 2012 · Nature of suit: 196 Franchise · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. closed
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:11-cv-01371 · Filed Mar 10, 2011 · Closed Apr 26, 2011 · Nature of suit: 196 Contract: Franchise · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-04-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC dismissed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:11-cv-01043 · Filed Mar 7, 2011 · Closed Oct 12, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Cobalt Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, Corp. judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:07-cv-07944 · Filed Sep 10, 2007 · Closed Mar 31, 2008 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions · Cause: 28:1332bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Cobalt Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Innovative, Inc. v. British plc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Innovative)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 8:00-cv-03635 · Filed Dec 13, 2000 · Closed Jun 29, 2001 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Innovative, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-06-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MD (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2010
AMARAY INTERNATIONAL CORP v. INNOVATIVE CORP INC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Innovative)
District Court, N.D. California · No. · Filed Nov 7, 1986 · Closed Aug 24, 1987 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of INNOVATIVE CORP INC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1987-08-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1986, issuer incorporated 2010
Brookstone Company, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC open
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:18-cv-03891 · Filed —
Role of Brookstone Company, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Innovative..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

16 cases: 16 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Kmart Holding Corporation v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 20-06930 · Filed Oct 13, 2020 · Closed Sep 2, 2021
Role of Kmart Holding Corporation v. Innovative Technology Electronics, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-09-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Business Park, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 10-91022 · Filed Mar 22, 2010 · Closed May 5, 2011
Role of Innovative Technology Business Park, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-05-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Linens Holding Co. v. Innovative Technology Electrics L/C closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 09-51239 · Filed Jul 1, 2009 · Closed May 11, 2010
Role of Linens Holding Co. v. Innovative Technology Electrics L/C: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-05-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology of Destin, Inc. v. Holley closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:07-ap-00299 · Filed Aug 3, 2007 · Closed May 13, 2010
Role of Innovative Technology of Destin, Inc. v. Holley: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-05-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (FL)
Advanced Modular Power Systems, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 07-34646 · Filed Jul 10, 2007 · Closed Jun 22, 2016
Role of Advanced Modular Power Systems, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2016-06-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Application, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 07-11324 · Filed May 24, 2007 · Closed Apr 19, 2010
Role of Innovative Technology Application, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
EDMONDSON v. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · No. 3:03-ap-00040 · Filed Jan 21, 2003 · Closed Feb 27, 2004
Role of EDMONDSON v. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-02-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TN (not the issuer's state)
Futurelink Madison Corporation v. Innovative Technology Solutions LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 02-02523 · Filed Jun 6, 2002 · Closed Sep 18, 2002
Role of Futurelink Madison Corporation v. Innovative Technology Solutions LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Business Innovative Technology Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · No. 8-00-87937 · Filed Dec 5, 2000 · Closed Jan 16, 2001
Role of Business Innovative Technology Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-01-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Frazer v. Innovative Technology Prod Llc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 2:99-ap-03290 · Filed Dec 7, 1999 · Closed Apr 24, 2001
Role of Frazer v. Innovative Technology Prod Llc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-04-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology, Ltd. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 96-16281 · Filed Aug 16, 1996 · Closed Feb 14, 1997
Role of Innovative Technology, Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-02-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 94-01861 · Filed Oct 12, 1994 · Closed Feb 15, 1996
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-02-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 94-01821 · Filed Sep 20, 1994 · Closed Jan 10, 1995
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1995-01-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 94-14326 · Filed Aug 15, 1994 · Closed Sep 15, 1999
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1999-09-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Innovative Technology Systems, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 92-15129 · Filed Sep 2, 1992 · Closed Sep 30, 1992
Role of Innovative Technology Systems, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Whitaker v. Innovative Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Innovative)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-01643 · Filed Apr 22, 1992 · Closed Mar 29, 1999
Role of Innovative Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1999-03-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (FL); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2010
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

4 differences found between the filings for Innovative — 2 worth asking about (compared 5 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Nov 27, 2012

Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Executive — IAT Radiation & Nuclear Detection Systems Inc.

Executive is listed as receiving sales compensation on 1 filing (Nov 27, 2012) with no FINRA CRD number given.

What this means People paid to sell securities normally hold a FINRA registration with a CRD number. Without one we cannot look them up on BrokerCheck. Ask who they are and whether they are registered.

Form D · Nov 27, 2012 ↗BrokerCheck search: Executive ↗IAT Radiation & Nuclear Detection Systems Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Nov 23, 2012

Paid seller listed without a CRD number: Company Executive — Nano Energy Technology LLC

Company Executive is listed as receiving sales compensation on 1 filing (Nov 23, 2012) with no FINRA CRD number given.

What this means People paid to sell securities normally hold a FINRA registration with a CRD number. Without one we cannot look them up on BrokerCheck. Ask who they are and whether they are registered.

Form D · Nov 23, 2012 ↗BrokerCheck search: Company Executive ↗Nano Energy Technology LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · May 6, 2010 – Nov 27, 2012

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Florida (3), Delaware (1) — out of 4 member issuers. The odd ones out: INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INC (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Innovative — sponsor group page ↗INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · May 3, 2010 – May 6, 2010

Issuer used a different name before — INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INC

SEC records list prior names for this filer: INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLONGY INC. The current name on file is "INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INC".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

2 of 4 offerings report sales commissions totalling $1,000,000; 4 report finder's fees totalling $2,200,000; 4 report proceeds to related persons totalling $1,400,000. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Nov 27, 2012 D
IAT Radiation & Nuclear Detection Systems Inc.
File 021-187474
$500,000 (est.)$500,000 (est.)$500,000 (est.)
This is the salary of the President for two years
Executive no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
Nov 23, 2012 D
Nano Energy Technology LLC
File 021-187406
$500,000 (est.)$500,000 (est.)$500,000 (est.)
The annual salary of the President and Executive Officer is estimated at $250,000. The estimated salary for three years is $500,000.
Company Executive no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
May 11, 2010 D
American Modular Power LLC
File 021-141854
$0$1,000,000 (est.)$200,000 (est.)
Proposed Executive Annual Salary
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 6, 2010 D/A
INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INC
File 021-141415
$0$200,000 (est.)$200,000 (est.)
Our executive officers and directors do not recieve commissions or finders fees. The $200,000 above reflects the annual salary of the President.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 4 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Innovative in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗IA INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INCshared people, same business addressCOCONUT CREEK, FLOther Technology2$00$25,0002010–2010
EDGAR ↗AM American Modular Power LLCshared people, same business addressCOCONUT CREEK, FLOther1$00$25,0002010–2010
EDGAR ↗NE Nano Energy Technology LLCshared people, same business addressCOCONUT CREEK, FLOther Energy1$00$25,0002012–2012
EDGAR ↗IR IAT Radiation & Nuclear Detection Systems Inc.shared people, same business addressCOCONUT CREEK, FLOther Technology1$00$25,0002012–2012

Market context: not shown for these offerings — fewer than 30 Form D filings in the last 5 years share the offering's industry and exemption, or the exemption claimed is not Rule 506(b)/506(c). No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Nov 27, 2012IAT Radiation & Nuclear Detection Systems Inc.DOther TechnologyIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Nov 23, 2012Nano Energy Technology LLCDOther EnergyIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗May 11, 2010American Modular Power LLCDOther$10,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗May 6, 2010INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INCD/AOther Technology$4,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗May 3, 2010INNOVATIVE AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY INCDOther Technology$4,000,000$0

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Nov 27, 2012. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other Technology (2010), Other (2010), Other Energy (2012). Latest offering: Other Technology (Nov 27, 2012).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
DF David Loron FrankExecutive Officer4May 3, 2010 → Nov 27, 2012

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Innovative.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Innovative as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Innovative's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #363,142 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: COCONUT CREEK), FL). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗Hillsborough County FL Clerk (HOVER) ↗Miami-Dade Clerk online case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

Florida Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗