PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:41 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

T

Teca

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · George Town, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)

Grouped because: 2 shared people, 2 shared management entities, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$133.3Mreported sold
103investors
16Form D filings
2019–2026active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 6, 2026 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Teca is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 16 Form D filings between Mar 2019 and Mar 2026.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 7 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $133.3M to 103 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in Cayman Islands (as filed: E9) (1), TX (1).

What this means $133.3M raised across the group, about $1.29M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Fernando Vigil (2 issuers, executive officer), Teca Partners, LP (2 issuers, promoter, entity), Thomas James Cagna (2 issuers, executive officer) and Teca Partners, LP (2 issuers, promoter, entity).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 6, 2026.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Adviser registration (Form ADV) on record: TECA PARTNERS, LP.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 1 court case matching the name, 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 2 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 16 public filings for Teca and found 10 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; 4 people are no longer listed on a later amendment; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Teca has not run yet — it is joining a line of 25,815 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

1 case: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Teca Corp v. United Exposition closed matched at sponsor-group level (Teca)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:89-cv-02351 · Filed Apr 7, 1989 · Closed Jul 16, 1991
Role of Teca Corp: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1991-07-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); filed 1989, first Form D 2019
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Teca..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Brandt v. Teca Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Teca)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · No. 97-06076 · Filed May 28, 1997 · Closed Sep 23, 1997
Role of Teca Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1997-09-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IN (not the issuer's state); filed 1997, first Form D 2019
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

10 differences found between the filings for Teca — 2 worth asking about (compared 16 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Mar 9, 2023 – Mar 8, 2024

Amount sold went down between filings — Teca Partners Domestic, LP

The Mar 9, 2023 filing says $99,563,000 sold; the Mar 8, 2024 Form D/A says $99,422,000 sold — $141,000 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 8, 2019 – Mar 8, 2024

4 people are no longer listed on a later amendment

TECA PARTNERS, LP is no longer listed on the Mar 8, 2024 amendment — Teca Partners Domestic, LP · TECA PARTNERS, LP is no longer listed on the Mar 8, 2024 amendment — Teca Partners Offshore, LP · THOMAS JAMES CAGNA is no longer listed on the Mar 9, 2020 amendment — Teca Partners Domestic, LP · THOMAS JAMES CAGNA is no longer listed on the Mar 9, 2020 amendment — Teca Partners Offshore, LP

What this means People leave; the issuer lists only current officers, directors and promoters. Ask why and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Mar 7, 2025 – Mar 6, 2026

Fernando Vigil's role changed at Teca Partners Offshore, LP: executive officer, promoter → executive officer

The Mar 7, 2025 filing lists Fernando Vigil as executive officer, promoter; the Mar 6, 2026 Form D/A lists executive officer.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Mar 8, 2024 – Mar 7, 2025

Fernando Vigil's role changed at Teca Partners Offshore, LP: executive officer → executive officer, promoter

The Mar 8, 2024 filing lists Fernando Vigil as executive officer; the Mar 7, 2025 Form D/A lists executive officer, promoter.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Mar 9, 2023 – Mar 8, 2024

Address moved from New York, NY to Austin, TX — Teca Partners Domestic, LP

The people listed on the Mar 9, 2023 filing give New York, NY; on the Mar 8, 2024 filing they give Austin, TX.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Mar 9, 2023 – Mar 8, 2024

Address moved from New York, NY to Austin, TX — Teca Partners Offshore, LP

The people listed on the Mar 9, 2023 filing give New York, NY; on the Mar 8, 2024 filing they give Austin, TX. The address now on file (27 Hospital Road, George Town, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)) is a registered-agent or shared-office address used by 227 issuers.

What this means A registered agent's address is a mailbox, not where the team works. Ask where the business actually operates.

Sources
Note · Mar 6, 2026

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Teca Partners Offshore, LP

The latest filing lists 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9). That address is used by 227 issuers in our index (registered agent / corporate services / fund administrator).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Sources
Note · Mar 6, 2026

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Cayman Islands (1), Delaware (1) — out of 2 member issuers. The odd ones out: Teca Partners Domestic, LP (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
Note · Mar 6, 2026

Member companies list addresses in 2 different states

Cayman Islands (as filed: E9) (1), TX (1). 1 member uses a registered-agent or shared-office address: Teca Partners Offshore, LP (27 Hospital Road, George Town, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)).

What this means A registered agent's address is a mailbox, not where the team works. The other address is more likely the real office — ask which one is.

Sources
Note · Mar 8, 2019 – Mar 6, 2026

Issuer used a different name before — Teca Partners Domestic, LP

SEC records list prior names for this filer: TECA PARTNERS DOMESTIC, LP. The current name on file is "Teca Partners Domestic, LP".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 2 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 6, 2026 D/A
Teca Partners Domestic, LP
File 021-334422
$0$0$0
Certain persons named in Item 3 or affiliate(s) thereof may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including management fees. The amount of such payments cannot be estimated at this time.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 6, 2026 D/A
Teca Partners Offshore, LP
File 021-334442
$0$0$0
Certain persons named in Item 3 or affiliate(s) thereof may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering, including management fees. The amount of such payments cannot be estimated at this time.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:40 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Teca in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:40 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2011–2026) — 824,793 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:40 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2011–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:40 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗TP Teca Partners Offshore, LPshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesGEORGE TOWN, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)Pooled Investment Fund8$27,980,013
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
12
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2019–2026
EDGAR ↗TP Teca Partners Domestic, LPshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesAUSTIN, TXPooled Investment Fund8$105,272,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
91
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2019–2026

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 6, 2026Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$105,272,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 6, 2026Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$27,980,013
EDGAR ↗Mar 7, 2025Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$105,022,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 7, 2025Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$27,980,013
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2024Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$99,422,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2024Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$27,980,013
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2023Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$27,980,013
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2023Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$99,563,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2022Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$27,980,013
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2022Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$98,563,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2021Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$73,163,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2021Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$10,880,013
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2020Teca Partners Offshore, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$4,700,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 9, 2020Teca Partners Domestic, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$60,073,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2019Teca Partners Offshore, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$3,200,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2019Teca Partners Domestic, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$59,973,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 6, 2026. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2019).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
FV Fernando VigilExecutive Officer2Mar 8, 2019 → Mar 6, 2026
TP Teca Partners, LP entityPromoter2Mar 9, 2020 → Mar 6, 2026
TP TECA PARTNERS, LP entityPromoter2Mar 8, 2019 → Mar 8, 2019
TC THOMAS JAMES CAGNAExecutive Officer2Mar 8, 2019 → Mar 8, 2019

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

TECA PARTNERS, LP — SEC-registered investment adviser · SEC registration status as reported: “Approved” since Jul 25, 2024 · SEC file 801-130766 · Main office: AUSTIN, TX · IAPD record ↗ · Form ADV filing (PDF) ↗

Regulatory assets under management: $174,785,964 as reported on Form ADV filed Mar 30, 2026 (Item 5.F(2)(c)) · 3 accounts (Item 5.F(2)(f))

Websites listed on Form ADV (Item 1.I): WWW.LINKEDIN.COM/COMPANY/TECA-PARTNERS-LP ↗

Item 11 disclosure questions as answered on Form ADV filed Mar 30, 2026: 0 of 24 answered “Yes”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11 asks: “Do any of the events below involve you or any of your supervised persons?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(1) asks: “A. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(2) asks: “A. (2) been charged with any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(1) asks: “B. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to a misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related business, or any fraud, false statements, or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(2) asks: “B. (2) been charged with a misdemeanor listed in Item 11.B(1)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(1) asks: “C. Has the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(2) asks: “C. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(3) asks: “C. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(4) asks: “C. (4) entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(5) asks: “C. (5) imposed a civil money penalty on you or any advisory affiliate, or ordered you or any advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(1) asks: “D. Has any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority: (1) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission, or been dishonest, unfair, or unethical?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(2) asks: “D. (2) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(3) asks: “D. (3) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(4) asks: “D. (4) in the past ten years, entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(5) asks: “D. (5) ever denied, suspended, or revoked your or any advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented you or any advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted your or any advisory affiliate's activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(1) asks: “E. Has any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(2) asks: “E. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(3) asks: “E. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been the cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(4) asks: “E. (4) disciplined you or any advisory affiliate by expelling or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from membership, barring or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from association with other members, or otherwise restricting your or the advisory affiliate's activities?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11F asks: “F. Has an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or any advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11G asks: “G. Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any regulatory proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.C., 11.D., or 11.E.?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(a) asks: “H. (1) Has any domestic or foreign court: (a) in the past ten years, enjoined you or any advisory affiliate in connection with any investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(b) asks: “H. (1)(b) ever found that you or any advisory affiliate were involved in a violation of investment-related statutes or regulations?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(c) asks: “H. (1)(c) ever dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or any advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(2) asks: “H. (2) Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H(1)?”

Answers as filed by the adviser on Form ADV Part 1A, Item 11; question text quoted from the form. Details of each “Yes” are in the Disclosure Reporting Pages of the Form ADV (PDF) ↗.

Matched on management entity listed on Form D = adviser name, same state (TX), issuer filed in E9 · Form ADV data: SEC Investment Adviser Information Report (SEC-registered advisers), file dated 2026-10-02, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:39 PM ET · IAPD record last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:36 PM ET

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Teca as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Teca's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #37,713 of 374,652 in line (1,299 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: GEORGE TOWN), E9). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.