PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:20 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

S

Squamtech

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · San Francisco, CA

Grouped because: 1 shared person, same business address (3 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$1.61Mreported sold
22investors
7Form D filings
2015–2018active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Nov 20, 2018 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Squamtech is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 7 Form D filings between Mar 2015 and Nov 2018.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 3 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.61M to 22 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Other Technology (3). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $1.61M raised across the group, about $73K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Marco Buhlmann (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Aaron Ober (1 issuer, executive officer and director), Ali Jelveh (1 issuer, executive officer and director), Arno Dirlam (1 issuer, director), Charles Temple (1 issuer, executive officer and director) and 1 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Nov 20, 2018.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — none found.

What this means Nothing turned up where we looked (4 sources). That does not prove there is nothing — it means none was found in those sources on that date.

We compared 7 public filings for Squamtech and found 5 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 516 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Squamtech has not run yet — it is joining a line of 13,393 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

None found in sources searched — federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Squamtech..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

None found in sources searched — federal bankruptcy courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:17 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

5 differences found between the filings for Squamtech — 1 worth asking about (compared 7 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Apr 27, 2017 – Sep 25, 2018

Form D filed 516 days after the first sale — M37 Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Apr 27, 2017. The Form D was filed Sep 25, 2018 — 516 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 501 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Jun 12, 2018 – Jun 29, 2018

Form D filed 17 days after the first sale — M37 Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Jun 12, 2018. The Form D was filed Jun 29, 2018 — 17 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Feb 21, 2017 – Mar 14, 2017

Form D filed 21 days after the first sale — V Labs Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Feb 21, 2017. The Form D was filed Mar 14, 2017 — 21 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 6 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Jun 12, 2017 – Sep 25, 2018

Offering amount changed between filings — M37 Inc.

The Jun 12, 2017 filing says $300,000 offered; the Sep 25, 2018 Form D/A says $400,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Jun 12, 2017 – Sep 25, 2018

Industry group changed between filings — M37 Inc.

"Other Technology" (Jun 12, 2017); then "Other" (Jun 29, 2018); then "Other Technology" (Sep 25, 2018 to Nov 20, 2018).

What this means The issuer described its business differently on different forms. Often it is just a different box ticked; sometimes the deal itself changed. Ask which business your money is in.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 6 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 2 report proceeds to related persons totalling $467,500. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Nov 20, 2018 D
M37 Inc.
File 021-326274
$0$0$400,000 (est.)None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 25, 2018 D/A
M37 Inc.
File 021-288531
$0$0$67,500None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 25, 2018 D
M37 Inc.
File 021-322122
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 29, 2018 D
M37 Inc.
File 021-315741
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 14, 2017 D
V Labs Inc.
File 021-282529
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 31, 2015 D
Squamtech, Inc.
File 021-236971
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 12:17 AM ET

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Squamtech in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 12:17 AM ET: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) — last checked Oct 24, 2026, 12:17 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) — last checked Oct 24, 2026, 12:17 AM ET; NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) — last checked Oct 24, 2026, 12:17 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗S Squamtech, Inc.shared people, same business addressSAN FRANCISCO, CAOther Technology1$8,0009No minimum reported2015–2015
EDGAR ↗VL V Labs Inc.shared people, same business addressSAN FRANCISCO, CAOther Technology1$80
offering $80 · similar: $1,100,015–$10,001,163
3
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2017–2017
EDGAR ↗M M37 Inc.shared people, same business addressSAN FRANCISCO, CAOther Technology5$1,600,000
offering $1,600,000 · similar: $1,100,015–$10,001,163
10
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2017–2018

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other Technology / 506(b) (17,390 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Nov 20, 2018M37 Inc.DOther Technology$1,600,000$1,600,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 25, 2018M37 Inc.D/AOther Technology$400,000$400,000
EDGAR ↗Sep 25, 2018M37 Inc.DOther Technology$80$80
EDGAR ↗Jun 29, 2018M37 Inc.DOther$5$5
EDGAR ↗Jun 12, 2017M37 Inc.DOther Technology$300,000$300,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 14, 2017V Labs Inc.DOther Technology$80$80
EDGAR ↗Mar 31, 2015Squamtech, Inc.DOther Technology$8,000$8,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Nov 20, 2018. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other Technology (2015–2017), Other (2018). Latest offering: Other Technology (2018; most recent Nov 20, 2018).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
MB Marco BuhlmannExecutive Officer, Director3Mar 31, 2015 → Nov 20, 2018
AJ Ali JelvehExecutive Officer, Director1Jun 12, 2017 → Nov 20, 2018
TA THIES ARNTZENExecutive Officer1Jun 29, 2018 → Nov 20, 2018
CT Charles TempleExecutive Officer, Director1Mar 14, 2017 → Mar 14, 2017
AD Arno DirlamDirector1Mar 14, 2017 → Mar 14, 2017
AO Aaron OberExecutive Officer, Director1Mar 31, 2015 → Mar 31, 2015

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Squamtech.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Squamtech as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Squamtech's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #245,441 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: SAN FRANCISCO), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.