PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:49 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

SC

S Cap

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · San Diego, CA

Grouped because: 2 shared people (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$5.98Mreported sold
30investors
3Form D filings
2010–2010active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jun 21, 2010 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

S Cap is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people; automatic match from the filings), filing 3 Form D filings between Jan 2010 and Jun 2010.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $5.98M to 30 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Other Real Estate (2). Issuers are based in CA (2).

What this means $5.98M raised across the group, about $199K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: David J. Ruyle (2 issuers, executive officer and director), Keffer C. Norris (2 issuers, executive officer), Daniel John Schuetz (1 issuer, executive officer), Mark McClure (1 issuer, executive officer) and McClure Mark (1 issuer, promoter).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Jun 21, 2010.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — none found.

What this means Nothing turned up where we looked (4 sources). That does not prove there is nothing — it means none was found in those sources on that date.

We compared 3 public filings for S Cap and found 11 differences, 4 worth asking the sponsor about: 26% of the money raised went to insiders; Form D filed 68 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for S Cap has not run yet — it is joining a line of 27,871 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

None found in sources searched — federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched S Cap..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

None found in sources searched — federal bankruptcy courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

11 differences found between the filings for S Cap — 4 worth asking about (compared 3 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jun 21, 2010

26% of the money raised went to insiders — HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC

The Jun 21, 2010 Form D reports $1,400,000 sold and $370,000 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters (marked as an estimate). Issuer's note: "Fifty percent (50%) of the projected profits, or $239,000 and $132,000 of projected preferred return for equity co-invest, will be distributed to the Principal Partners based on their prorata share of".

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Sources
Worth asking · Jun 21, 2010

26% of the money raised went to insiders — HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC

The Jun 21, 2010 Form D reports $1,400,000 sold and $370,000 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters (marked as an estimate). Issuer's note: "Fifty percent (50%) of the projected profits, or $239,000 and $132,000 of projected preferred return for equity co-invest, will be distributed to the Principal Partners based on their prorata share of".

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Sources
Note · Jan 28, 2010

23% of the money raised went to insiders — S-CAP 09-5080, LLC

The Jan 28, 2010 Form D reports $4,577,000 sold and $1,057,980 of the proceeds used for payments to officers, directors or promoters (marked as an estimate). Issuer's note: "Fee of three percentage points (3%) of acquisition price paid to Manager and thirty percent (30%) of projected profits.".

What this means The filing reports how much of the money raised was paid to insiders. Over 10% is high for most deals. Ask what it paid for.

Sources
Worth asking · Apr 14, 2010 – Jun 21, 2010

Form D filed 68 days after the first sale — HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Apr 14, 2010. The Form D was filed Jun 21, 2010 — 68 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 53 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · Apr 14, 2010 – Jun 21, 2010

Form D filed 68 days after the first sale — HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Apr 14, 2010. The Form D was filed Jun 21, 2010 — 68 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 53 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Dec 29, 2009 – Jan 28, 2010

Form D filed 30 days after the first sale — S-CAP 09-5080, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Dec 29, 2009. The Form D was filed Jan 28, 2010 — 30 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 15 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Apr 14, 2010 – Jun 21, 2010

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC (latest filing Jun 21, 2010)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jun 21, 2010 (first sale Apr 14, 2010). It reports $1,400,000 sold of $1,931,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Apr 14, 2010 – Jun 21, 2010

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC (latest filing Jun 21, 2010)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jun 21, 2010 (first sale Apr 14, 2010). It reports $1,400,000 sold of $1,931,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Dec 29, 2009 – Jan 28, 2010

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — S-CAP 09-5080, LLC (latest filing Jan 28, 2010)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jan 28, 2010 (first sale Dec 29, 2009). It reports $4,577,000 sold of $4,727,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jan 28, 2010 – Jun 21, 2010

David J. Ruyle is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "David Ruyle" on the Jan 28, 2010 filing, and "David J. Ruyle" on 2 filings (from Jun 21, 2010).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Jan 28, 2010 – Jun 21, 2010

Keffer C. Norris is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Keffer Cornelius Norris" on the Jan 28, 2010 filing, and "Keffer C. Norris" on 2 filings (from Jun 21, 2010).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 3 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 3 report proceeds to related persons totalling $1,797,980. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jun 21, 2010 D
HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC
File 021-143786
$0$0$370,000 (est.)
Fifty percent (50%) of the projected profits, or $239,000 and $132,000 of projected preferred return for equity co-invest, will be distributed to the Principal Partners based on their prorata share of Company ownership, and equity investment, respectively
NA no CRD number reported
via NA
EDGAR ↗
Jun 21, 2010 D
HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLC
File 021-143785
$0$0$370,000 (est.)
Fifty percent (50%) of the projected profits, or $239,000 and $132,000 of projected preferred return for equity co-invest, will be distributed to the Principal Partners based on their prorata share of Company ownership, and equity investment, respectively
NA no CRD number reported
via NA
EDGAR ↗
Jan 28, 2010 D
S-CAP 09-5080, LLC
File 021-138251
$0$0$1,057,980 (est.)
Fee of three percentage points (3%) of acquisition price paid to Manager and thirty percent (30%) of projected profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to S Cap in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026) — 914,276 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗SC S-CAP 09-5080, LLCshared peopleSAN DIEGO, CAOther Real Estate1$4,577,00025$20,0002010–2010
EDGAR ↗H1 HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLCshared peopleSAN DIEGO, CAOther Real Estate2$1,400,0005$25,0002010–2010

Market context: not shown for these offerings — fewer than 30 Form D filings in the last 5 years share the offering's industry and exemption, or the exemption claimed is not Rule 506(b)/506(c). No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jun 21, 2010HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLCDOther Real Estate$1,931,000$1,400,000
EDGAR ↗Jun 21, 2010HLS 10-1075 Series 1, LLCDOther Real Estate$1,931,000$1,400,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 28, 2010S-CAP 09-5080, LLCDOther Real Estate$4,727,000$4,577,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jun 21, 2010. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 3 offerings reported: Other Real Estate (2010).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
DR David J. RuyleExecutive Officer, Director2Jan 28, 2010 → Jun 21, 2010
KN Keffer C. NorrisExecutive Officer2Jan 28, 2010 → Jun 21, 2010
MM Mark McClureExecutive Officer1Jun 21, 2010 → Jun 21, 2010
MM McClure MarkPromoter1Jan 28, 2010 → Jan 28, 2010
DS Daniel John SchuetzExecutive Officer1Jan 28, 2010 → Jan 28, 2010

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched S Cap.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for S Cap as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in S Cap's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #364,788 of 374,652 in line (1,345 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: SAN DIEGO), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.