PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:09 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

R

Rubicon

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)

Grouped because: 4 shared people, 1 shared management entity, same business address (2 issuers), similar issuer names (2) · 2 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$282.7Mreported sold
48investors
16Form D filings
2012–2019active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 21, 2019 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Rubicon is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 16 Form D filings between Mar 2012 and Mar 2019.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 7 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $282.7M to 48 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in Cayman Islands (as filed: E9) (2).

What this means $282.7M raised across the group, about $5.89M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: David DeRosa (2 issuers, director), H. Joseph Leitch (2 issuers, director), James G. Webb (2 issuers, director), Jim Webb (2 issuers, director), Joseph Rubicon Fund Management LLP (2 issuers, promoter, entity) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 21, 2019.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 6 court cases matching the name, 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 7 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 16 public filings for Rubicon and found 12 differences, 6 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; 4 offerings reported fewer investors on a later filing; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Rubicon has not run yet — it is joining a line of 7,962 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 27 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

6 cases: 1 open, 3 dismissed, 1 judgment, 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Stokes v. Rubicon, LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · No. 3:22-cv-00204 · Filed Mar 28, 2022
Role of Rubicon, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
S&B Engineers and Co v. Rubicon, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · No. 3:99-cv-00774 · Filed Sep 16, 1999 · Closed Sep 24, 2001 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Rubicon, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2001-09-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
Sanders v. Rubicon, Inc. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · No. 3:93-cv-00846 · Filed Oct 6, 1993 · Closed Mar 12, 1996 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Rubicon, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1996-03-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in LA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2012
Sanders v. Rubicon, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · No. 3:93-cv-00205 · Filed Apr 30, 1993 · Closed Sep 10, 1993 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Rubicon, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1993-09-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MS (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2012
Rubicon Corp v. Canadian Medical Lab dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:88-cv-02544 · Filed Oct 14, 1988 · Closed Aug 7, 1989 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Rubicon Corp: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1989-08-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TX (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, first Form D 2012
RUBICON CORP v. ALLIED MEDICAL LABORATORIES dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
District Court, S.D. Illinois · No. · Filed Apr 6, 1988 · Closed Jul 6, 1989 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of RUBICON CORP: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1989-07-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, first Form D 2012
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Rubicon..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

The Rubicon Company closed matched at sponsor-group level (Rubicon)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 86-90114 · Filed Jun 19, 1986 · Closed Jan 25, 1989
Role of The Rubicon Company: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1989-01-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MI (not the issuer's state); filed 1986, first Form D 2012
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

12 differences found between the filings for Rubicon — 6 worth asking about (compared 16 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Mar 21, 2016 – Mar 21, 2017

Amount sold went down between filings — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.

The Mar 21, 2016 filing says $38,482,680 sold; the Mar 21, 2017 Form D/A says $250,000 sold — $38,232,680 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Form D/A (earlier) · Mar 21, 2016 ↗Form D/A (later) · Mar 21, 2017 ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Mar 21, 2016 – Mar 21, 2017

Amount sold went down between filings — Rubicon Global Fund

The Mar 21, 2016 filing says $240,800,000 sold; the Mar 21, 2017 Form D/A says $104,275,342 sold — $136,524,658 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Form D/A (earlier) · Mar 21, 2016 ↗Form D/A (later) · Mar 21, 2017 ↗Rubicon Global Fund — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Mar 21, 2014 – Mar 21, 2018

4 offerings reported fewer investors on a later filing

Investor count went down between filings — Rubicon Global Fund · Investor count went down between filings — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. · Investor count went down between filings — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. · Investor count went down between filings — Rubicon Global Fund

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. Ask the sponsor what happened on each.

Form D/A (earlier) · Mar 21, 2017 ↗Form D/A (later) · Mar 21, 2018 ↗Rubicon Global Fund — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D/A (earlier) · Mar 20, 2015 ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Nov 22, 1999 – Mar 23, 2012

Form D filed 4,505 days after the first sale — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.

The filing says the first sale was Nov 22, 1999. The Form D was filed Mar 23, 2012 — 4,505 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 4,490 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Mar 23, 2012 ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Nov 22, 1999 – Mar 23, 2012

Form D filed 4,505 days after the first sale — Rubicon Global Fund

The filing says the first sale was Nov 22, 1999. The Form D was filed Mar 23, 2012 — 4,505 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 4,490 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Mar 23, 2012 ↗Rubicon Global Fund — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Mar 23, 2012 – Mar 22, 2013

4 people are no longer listed on a later amendment

David DeRosa is no longer listed on the Mar 22, 2013 amendment — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. · Jim Webb is no longer listed on the Mar 22, 2013 amendment — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. · Jim Webb is no longer listed on the Mar 22, 2013 amendment — Rubicon Global Fund · Joseph H Leitch is no longer listed on the Mar 22, 2013 amendment — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.

What this means People leave; the issuer lists only current officers, directors and promoters. Ask why and who replaced them.

Form D · Mar 23, 2012 ↗Form D/A · Mar 22, 2013 ↗David DeRosa — PartnerFacts page ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 21, 2014 – Mar 20, 2015

James G. Webb's role changed at Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.: executive officer, director → director

The Mar 21, 2014 filing lists James G. Webb as executive officer, director; the Mar 20, 2015 Form D/A lists director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Form D/A · Mar 21, 2014 ↗Form D/A · Mar 20, 2015 ↗James G. Webb — PartnerFacts page ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 22, 2013 – Mar 21, 2014

James G. Webb's role changed at Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.: director → executive officer, director

The Mar 22, 2013 filing lists James G. Webb as director; the Mar 21, 2014 Form D/A lists executive officer, director.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Form D/A · Mar 22, 2013 ↗Form D/A · Mar 21, 2014 ↗James G. Webb — PartnerFacts page ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 22, 1999 – Mar 21, 2019

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. (latest filing Mar 21, 2019)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 21, 2019 (first sale Nov 22, 1999). It reports $44,282,680 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Mar 21, 2019 ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 22, 1999 – Mar 21, 2019

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Rubicon Global Fund (latest filing Mar 21, 2019)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 21, 2019 (first sale Nov 22, 1999). It reports $238,374,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Mar 21, 2019 ↗Rubicon Global Fund — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 23, 2012 – Mar 22, 2013

Minimum investment changed between filings — Rubicon Global Fund

The Mar 23, 2012 filing lists a minimum of $50,000; the Mar 22, 2013 Form D/A lists $100,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Form D (earlier) · Mar 23, 2012 ↗Form D/A (later) · Mar 22, 2013 ↗Rubicon Global Fund — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Mar 21, 2019

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Cayman Islands (1), Delaware (1) — out of 2 member issuers. The odd ones out: Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Rubicon — sponsor group page ↗Rubicon Global Partners, L.P. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 2 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 21, 2019 D/A
Rubicon Global Fund
File 021-175453
$0$0$0
The fund charges a management fee that is described in the fund's offering documents.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 21, 2019 D/A
Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.
File 021-175455
$0$0$0
The fund charges a management fee that is described in the fund's offering documents.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Rubicon in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗RG Rubicon Global Fundshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)GRAND CAYMAN, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)Pooled Investment Fund8$240,800,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
31
similar: 4–27
$100,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2012–2019
EDGAR ↗RG Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)GRAND CAYMAN, Cayman Islands (as filed: E9)Pooled Investment Fund8$44,282,680
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
17
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2012–2019

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2019Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$44,282,680
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2019Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$238,374,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2018Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$44,282,680
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2018Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$238,374,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2017Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$250,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2017Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$104,275,342
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2016Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$38,482,680
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2016Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$240,800,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 20, 2015Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$136,630,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 20, 2015Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$38,382,680
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2014Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$130,330,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 21, 2014Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$38,382,680
EDGAR ↗Mar 22, 2013Rubicon Global FundD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$81,150,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 22, 2013Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$37,700,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 23, 2012Rubicon Global Partners, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$14,432,680
EDGAR ↗Mar 23, 2012Rubicon Global FundDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$73,661,508

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 21, 2019. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2012).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
JW James G. WebbDirector2Mar 22, 2013 → Mar 21, 2019
HL H. Joseph LeitchDirector2Mar 23, 2012 → Mar 21, 2019
DD David DeRosaDirector2Mar 23, 2012 → Mar 21, 2019
JR Joseph Rubicon Fund Management LLP entityPromoter2Mar 20, 2015 → Mar 21, 2019
JW Jim WebbDirector2Mar 23, 2012 → Mar 23, 2012
AT Anthony TraversDirector1Mar 23, 2012 → Mar 21, 2019
RF Rubicon Fund Management Limited entityExecutive Officer1Mar 21, 2014 → Mar 21, 2019
JL Joseph H LeitchDirector1Mar 23, 2012 → Mar 23, 2012

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Rubicon.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Rubicon as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Rubicon's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #238,883 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: GRAND CAYMAN), E9). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

OpenCorporates ↗